School Choice and Social Class: Urban Geographies and Educational Opportunities

  • Deborah WilsonEmail author
Reference work entry
Part of the Geographies of Children and Young People book series (GCYP, volume 12)


The schools students attend and the education they receive matters for their further education and employment opportunities and future life chances. The mechanisms by which students are allocated to schools therefore play a fundamental part in determining access to such educational opportunities. Choice-based mechanisms are now established, and politically popular, methods of allocating students to schools, and advocates argue that school choice both improves performance and ensures equity of access to good quality schools. The evidence to support such arguments is, however, much less conclusive: across a diversity of institutional contexts a common finding is that school choice reproduces social class advantage in the education context. In this chapter I focus on the outcomes of school choice policies and their implications for the educational opportunities created for young people from different social class backgrounds. I first discuss the theoretical benefits of school choice and show how it is in urban areas that there may be the greatest potential for realising those benefits. I then consider the extent to which the evidence supports the rhetoric and why, in practice, the theoretical benefits may not be realised. Reviewing the literature from different national and institutional contexts, I argue that the evidence suggests that class-based inequalities of educational opportunity have not been reduced through policies of school choice. The reasons behind these observed outcomes are, however, complex and inter-connected, and potential policy solutions are not straightforward, particularly given the entrenched advantages of the middle-classes in the education ‘market’.


School choice Social class Educational opportunities Education market School performance Equity of access Educational outcomes Preferences Constraints 


  1. Allen, R., & Burgess, S. (2010). The future of competition and accountability in education. . Accessed 16 Jun 2011.
  2. Allen, R., & Vignoles, A. (2009). Can school competition improve standards? The case of faith schools in England. DoQSS Working Paper 09/04.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, R., Burgess, S., & McKenna, L. (2013). The short-run impact of using lotteries for school admissions: Early results from Brighton and Hove’s reforms. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1), 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, A., Gregg, P., & McConnell, B. (2006). The result of 11-plus selection: An investigation into opportunities and outcomes for pupils in selective LEAs. CMPO Discussion Paper 06/150, Bristol: CMPO.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, A., Burgess, S., Gregg, P., Propper, C., & Proud, S. (2008). The impact of classroom peer groups on pupil GCSE results. CMPO Discussion Paper 08/187. Bristol: CMPO.Google Scholar
  6. Ball, S., & Vincent, C. (1998). ‘I heard it on the grapevine’: ‘Hot’ knowledge and school choice. British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 19(3), 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benson, M., Bridge, G., & Wilson, D. (2014). School choice in London and Paris – A comparison of middle-class strategies. Social Policy and Administration, available online from 19 May 2014. doi: 10.1111/spol.12079.Google Scholar
  8. Böhlmark, A., & Lindahl, M. (2008). Does school privatization improve educational achievement? Evidence from Sweden’s voucher reform. IZA Discussion Paper 3691.Google Scholar
  9. Bradley, S., & Taylor, J. (2002). The effect of the quasi-market on the efficiency-equity trade-off in the secondary school sector. Bulletin of Economic Research, 54(3), 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bridge, G., & Wilson, D. (2014). Towards an interactive sociological rational choice approach to theorising class dimensions of school choice. Policy and Politics, available online from 14 Feb 2014.Google Scholar
  11. Burgess, S., & Slater, H. (2006). Using boundary changes to estimate the impact of school competition on test scores. CMPO Discussion Paper 06/158, Bristol: CMPO.Google Scholar
  12. Burgess, S., Propper, C., Slater, H., & Wilson, D. (2005). Who wins and who loses from school accountability? The distribution of educational gain in English secondary schools. CMPO Discussion Paper 05/128, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  13. Burgess, S., Propper, C., & Wilson, D. (2007a). The impact of school choice in England: Implications from the economic evidence. Policy Studies, 28(2), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burgess, S., McConnell, B., Propper, C., & Wilson, D. (2007b). The impact of school choice on sorting by ability and socio-economic factors in English secondary education. In L. Woessmann & P. Peterson (Eds.), Schools and the equal opportunity problem (pp. 273–291). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Burgess, S., Greaves, E., Vignoles, A., & Wilson, D. (2011). Parental choice of primary school in England: What types of school do different types of family really have available to them? Policy Studies, 32(5), 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burgess, S., Greaves, E., Vignoles, A., & Wilson, D. (2014). What parents want: School preferences and school choice, Economic Journal, available online from 21 Aug 2014. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12153.Google Scholar
  17. Burgess, S., Dickson, M., & Macmillan, L. (2014). Selective schooling systems increase inequality, CMPO Discussion Paper 14/323, Bristol: CMPO.Google Scholar
  18. Butler, T., & Hamnett, C. (2010). ‘You take what you are given’: The limits of parental choice in education in east London. Environment and Planning A, 42, 2431–2450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Butler, T., & van Zanten, A. (2007). School choice: A European perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 22(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coldron, J., Crips, C., & Shipton, L. (2010). Why are English secondary schools socially segregated. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dearden, L., Ryan, C., & Sibieta, L. (2010). What determines private school choice? A comparison between the United Kingdom and Australia. IFS Working Paper No. 10,22, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
  22. DfE (Department for Education). (2012). GCSE and equivalent attainment by pupil characteristics in England 2010/11, . Accessed 16 Oct 2014.
  23. Fack, G., & Grenet, J. (2010). When do better schools raise housing prices? Evidence from Paris public and private schools. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibbons, S., Machin, S., & Silva, O. (2008). Choice, competition and pupil achievement. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(4), 912–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greener, I., & Powell, M. (2008). The evolution of choice policies in UK housing, education and health policy. Journal of Social Policy, 38(1), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harris, R. (2010). Segregation by choice? The debate so far. CMPO Discussion Paper 10/251, Bristol: CMPO.Google Scholar
  27. Harris, R., Johnston, J., Jones, K., & Owen, D. (2013). Are indices still useful for measuring socioeconomic segregation in UK schools? A response to Watts. Environment and Planning A, 45, 2281–2289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hastings, J., & Weinstein, J. (2008). Information, school choice and academic achievement: Evidence from two experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1373–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to declines in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hood, C. (2006). Gaming in target world: The targets approach to managing British public services. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 515–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoxby, C. (2000). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review, 90(5), 1209–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karsten, S., Visscher, A., & De Jong, T. (2001). Another side to the coin: The unintended effects of the publication of school performance data in England and France. Comparative Education, 37(2), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ladd, H. (2003). Comment on Caroline Hoxby: School choice and competition: Evidence from the United States. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 10, 67–76.Google Scholar
  34. Lauen, D. (2007). Contextual explanations of school choice. Sociology of Education, 80, 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Le Grand, J. (2007). The other invisible hand: Delivering public services through choice and competition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Levaĉić, R. (2004). Competition and the performance of English secondary schools: Further evidence. Education Economics, 12, 179–194.Google Scholar
  37. Open Public Services White Paper. (2011). Available from, Published 1 Jul 2011. Accessed 1 Dec 2014.
  38. Pennell, H., West, A., & Hind, A. (2007). Religious composition and admission processes of faith secondary schools in London. London: Comprehensive Future.Google Scholar
  39. Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit. (2006). The UK Government’s approach to public service reform – A discussion paper. Available at: Accessed 15 Jun 2006.
  40. Reay, D., & Lucey, H. (2003). The limits of choice: Children and inner city schooling. Sociology, 37(1), 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rothstein, J. (2006). Good principals or good peers? Parental valuation of school characteristics, Tiebout equilibrium, and the incentive effects of competition among jurisdictions. American Economic Review, 96(4), 1333–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rothstein, J. (2007). Does competition among public schools benefit students and tax-payers? A comment on Hoxby (2000). American Economic Review, 97(5), 2026–2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watts, M. (2013). Socioeconomic segregation in UK (secondary) schools: Are index measures still useful? Environment and Planning A, 45, 1528–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. West, A., & Pennell, H. (2000). Publishing school examination results in England: Incentives and consequences. Educational Studies, 26(4), 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. West, A., Barhan, E., & Hind, A. (2009). School choice in London, England: Characteristics of students in different types of secondary schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(2–3), 498–529.Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, D. (2009). Exit, voice and quality in the English education sector. Social Policy and Administration, 43(6), 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson, D. (2013). Targets, choice and voice: Accountability in public services? In S. Griffiths, H. Kippin, & G. Stoker (Eds.), Public services: A new reform agenda. London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, D., & Piebalga, A. (2008). Performance measures, ranking and parental choice: An analysis of the English school league tables. International Public Management Journal, 11(3), 344–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson, D., Croxson, B., & Atkinson, A. (2006). “What gets measured gets done”: Headteachers’ responses to the English secondary school performance management system. Policy Studies, 27(2), 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School for Policy StudiesUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations