Advertisement

Child-Friendly and Sustainable Cities: Exploring Global Studies on Children’s Freedom, Mobility, and Risk

  • Karen MaloneEmail author
  • Julie Rudner
Reference work entry
Part of the Geographies of Children and Young People book series (GCYP, volume 12)

Abstract

This chapter explores the role of child-friendly cities in supporting sustainable development of cities. It does this by ascertaining how to devise an approach to analyzing children’s independent mobility (CIM) by reviewing global studies on freedom, mobility, and risk and then applying a sociocultural-ecological analysis to consider some of the challenges. By applying this approach, the authors seek to better understand the sociocultural-ecological factors that are unique to specific countries, cities, or communities and expose how these could be influential in understanding the diversity of children’s experiences. A diversity and range of experiences are presented that are not just country focused using generalized country level data but delve into the individual nuances of communities and cities to understand the similarities and differences within and across cities and communities at a local and global level. The chapter starts with an introduction and a critical review of the range of studies in CIM globally and their limitations. It then seeks to explore how important acknowledging the complexity of sociocultural-ecological differences within cities and countries and across countries will be to planning child-friendly and sustainable cities over the next two decades, in light of the introduction of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

Keywords

Child-friendly cities initiative (CFCI) Children’s independent mobility (CIM) Age and gender Multiculturalism Negotiating and decision-making Risk conception School access Settlement types Socioeconomic status United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 

References

  1. Adams, J. (2006). Risk (5th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmadi, E. (2007). Influential factors on children’s spatial knowledge and mobility in home-school travel: A case study in the city of Tehran. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 6(2), 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barron, C. M. (2014). ‘I had no credit to ring you back’: Children’s strategies of negotiation and resistance to parental surveillance via mobile phones. Surveillance & Society, 12(3), 401–413.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benwell, M. (2009). Challenging minority world privilege: Children’s outdoor mobilities in post-apartheid South Africa. Mobilities, 4(1), 77–101. doi:10.1080/17450100802657970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blerk, L. V. (2005). Negotiating spatial identities: mobile perspectives on street life in Uganda. Children’s Geographies, 3(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bwire, H. (2011). Children’s independent mobility and perceptions of outdoor environments in Dar Es Salaam City. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(3), 184–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dean, M. (1994). “A social structure of many souls”: Moral regulation, government, and self-formulation. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 19(2), 145–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Driandra, R. P., & Kinoshita, I. (2011). Danger from traffic to fear of monkeys: Children’s independent mobility in four diverse sites in Japan. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(3), 224–240.Google Scholar
  10. Elias, W., & Katoshevski-Cavari, R. (2014). The role of socio-economic and environmental characteristics in school-commuting behavior: A comparative study of Jewish and Arab children in Israel. Transport Policy, 32(0), 79–87. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ermagun, A., & Samimi, A. (2015). Promoting active transportation modes in school trips. Transport Policy, 37((0), 203–211. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.10.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finkelhor, D., & Ormrod, R. (2000). Characteristics of crimes against juveniles. Retrieved from Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Fox, N. J. (1999). Postmodern reflections on ‘risk’, hazards’ and life choices. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives (pp. 12–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman, C., & Quigg, R. (2009). Commuting lives: Children’s mobility and energy use. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(3), 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, C. (2010). Children’s neighbourhoods, social centres to ‘terra incognita’. Children’s Geographies, 8(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haveman, M., Tillmann, V., Stöppler, R., Kvas, Š., & Monninger, D. (2013). Mobility and public transport use abilities of children and young adults with intellectual disabilities: Results from the 3-year nordhorn public transportation intervention study. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 10(4), 289–299. 10.1111/jppi.12059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. He, G., Cerin, E., Huang, W. Y., & Wong, S. H. (2014). Understanding neighborhood environment related to Hong Kong children’s physical activity: A qualitative study using nominal group technique. PLoS ONE, 9(9), e106578. 10.1371/journal.pone.0106578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hillman, M., Adams, J., & Whitelegg, J. (1990). One false move…a study of children’s independent mobility. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Horton, J., Christensen, P., Kraftl, P., & Hadfield-Hill, S. (2013). ‘Walking … just walking’: How children and young people’s everyday pedestrian practices matter. Social & Cultural Geography, 15(1), 94–115. 10.1080/14649365.2013.864782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. International Secretariat for Child Friendly Cities. (2004). Building child friendly cities: A framework for action. Florence: Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  21. Jaeger, C. C., Renn, O., Rosa, E. A., & Webler, T. (2001). Risk, uncertainty, and rational action. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Jensen, O. B., Sheller, M., & Wind, S. (2014). Together and apart: Affective ambiences and negotiation in families’ everyday life and mobility. Mobilities, 10(3): 1–20. 10.1080/17450101.2013.868158.Google Scholar
  23. Kullman, K. (2010). Transitional geographies: making mobile children. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(8), 829–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kullman, K., & Palludan, C. (2011). Rhythmanalytical sketches: agencies, school journeys, temporalities. Children’s Geographies, 9(3–4), 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kyttä, M., Hirvonen, J., Rudner, J., Pirjola, I., & Laatikainen, T. (2015). The last free-range children? Children’s independent mobility in Finland in the 1990s and 2010s. Journal of Transport Geography, 47, 1–12. 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Larouche, R., Oyeyemi, A. L., Prista, A., Onywera, K. K., & Tremblay, M. S. (2014). A systematic review of active transportation research in Africa and the psychometric properties of measurement tools for children and youth. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(29), 1–18.Google Scholar
  27. Loo, B. P. Y., & Lam, W. W. Y. (2013). Does neighbourhood count in affecting children’s journeys to schools? Children’s Geographies, 13(1), 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malone, K. (2002). Streetlife: Youth, culture and competing uses of public space. Environment and Urbanisation, 14(2), 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malone, K. (2007). The bubble-wrap generation: Children growing up in walled gardens. Environmental Education Researcher, 13(4), 513–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malone, K. (2015). Children’s rights and the crisis of rapid urbanization: Exploring the United Nations Post 2015 Sustainable Development Agenda and the potential role for UNICEF’s Child Friendly Cities Initiative. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 23, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mammen, G., Faulkner, G., Buliung, R., & Lay, J. (2012). Understanding the drive to escort: A cross-sectional analysis examining parental attitudes towards children’s school travel and independent mobility. BMC Public Health, 12, 862. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mikkelsen, M. R., & Christensen, P. (2009). Is children’s independent mobility really independent? A study of children’s mobility combining ethnography and GPS/mobile phone technologies1. Mobilities, 4(1), 37–58. 10.1080/17450100802657954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murray, L., & Mand, K. (2013). Travelling near and far: Placing children’s mobile emotions. Emotion, Space and Society, 9(0), 72–79. 10.1016/j.emospa.2013.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nasrudin, N. a., & Nor, A. R. M. (2013). Travelling to school: Transportation selection by parents and awareness towards sustainable transportation. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17(0), 392–400. 10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Park, H., Noland, R. B., & Lachapelle, U. (2013). Active school trips: Associations with caregiver walking frequency. Transport Policy, 29(0), 23–28. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Porter, G., Hampshire, K., Abane, A., Munthali, A., Robson, E., Mashiri, M., & Maponya, G. (2010). Where dogs, ghosts and lions roam: Learning from mobile ethnographies on the journey from school. Children’s Geographies, 8(2), 91–105. 10.1080/14733281003691343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pyer, M., & Tucker, F. (2014). ‘With us, we, like, physically can’t’: Transport, mobility and the leisure experiences of teenage wheelchair users. Mobilities, 1–17. 10.1080/17450101.2014.970390.Google Scholar
  38. Schoeppe, S., Tranter, P., Duncan, M. J., Curtis, C., Carver, A., & Malone, K. (2015). Australian children’s independent mobility levels: Secondary analyses of cross-sectional data between 1991–2012. Children’s Geographies. doi: 10.1080/14733285.2015.1082083.Google Scholar
  39. Shaw, B., Watson, B., Frauendienst, B., Redecker, A., Jones, T., & Hillman, M. (2013). Children’s independent mobility: A comparative study in England and Germany (1971–2010). Retrieved from London.Google Scholar
  40. Shokoohi, R., Hanif, N. R., & Dali, M. M. (2011). Children walking to and from school in Tehran: Associations with neighborhood safety, parental concerns and children’s perceptions. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 2(4), 13–25.Google Scholar
  41. UNICEF. (1992). Convention on the rights of the child. New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  42. UNICEF. (1997). Children’s rights and habitat: Working towards child-friendly cities. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  43. UNICEF. (2013). A post-2015 world fit for children: Sustainable development starts and ends with safe, healthy and well-educated children. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  44. United Nations. (2013). A new global partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. United Nations report released April 2013. New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  45. Valentine, G. (1996). Angels and devils: Moral landscapes of childhood. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14, 581–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wann, J. P., Poulter, D. R., & Purcell, C. (2011). Reduced sensitivity to visual looming inflates the risk posed by speeding vehicles when children try to cross the road. Psychological Science, 22(4), 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weir, L. A., Etelson, D., & Brand, D. A. s. (2006). Parents’ perceptions of neighborhood safety and children’s physical activity. Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 212. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WPG-4K0FFPR-2/2/04aa86b7f3890f5f72fb462eb00eeac6.
  48. Worth, N. (2013). Visual impairment in the city: Young people’s social strategies for independent mobility. Urban Studies, 50(3), 574–586. 10.1177/0042098012468898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yatiman, N. A., Aziz, N. F., & Said, I. (2012). Affordances of homeschool journey in rural environment for children’s performances. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68(0), 395–405. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Australia, as represented by University of Western Sydney 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Educational ResearchUniversity of Western SydneyPenrithAustralia
  2. 2.School of Humanities, Community Planning and DevelopmentLa Trobe UniversityBendigoAustralia

Personalised recommendations