Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Young People in the Digital Age: Metrics of Friendship

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Families, Intergenerationality, and Peer Group Relations

Part of the book series: Geographies of Children and Young People ((GCYP,volume 5))

Abstract

This chapter provides a critical overview of the debates on how new developments in the digital age, such as forms of social media, specifically social networking sites, are influencing the social, cultural, and geographical dimensions of young people’s friendships. As a distinctive aspect of young people’s lives, friendships are regarded as sites of companionship, support, and at times intimacy but can also be fraught with anxieties or difficulties. Social networking sites are new technological platforms that exist explicitly to facilitate the practice of friendship. However, there are diverse opinions in both the scholarly and popular literature on the extent to which these sites and other forms of social media are transforming the nature and meaning of contemporary friendship. A range of commentators also debate in sometimes quite polarizing terms whether the net effects of these new social media are positive and negative. This chapter explores how social media practices shape friendship for young people and argues that it is unproductive to take a binaristic view of the effects of social media as young people in the digital age are diverse in the ways they “do” friendship and in the ways they mobilize newer social resources that have opened up to them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, P. C. (2005). The boundless self: Communication in physical and virtual spaces. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1987). Nicomachean ethics (trans: Martin Oswald). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2013). to have Linkedin profiles. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23766251. Accessed 7 Sept 15.

  • Beer, D. (2008). Social network(ing) sites…revisiting the story so far: A response to Danah Boyd & Nicole Ellison. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(2), 516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatterer, H. (2014). Everyday friendships: Intimacy as freedom in complex World. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatterer, H. (2010). Social networking, privacy and the pursuit of visibility. In H. Blatterer, P. Johnson, & M. R. Markus (Eds.), Modern privacy: Shifting boundaries, new forms. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bobkowski, P., & Smith, J. (2013). Social media divide: Characteristics of emerging adults who do not use social network websites. Media Culture Society, 35(6), 771–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. (2013). White flight in networked publics? How race and class shaped American teen engagement with MySpace and Facebook. In L. Nakamura & P. Chow-White (Eds.), Race after the Internet. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), MacArthur foundation series on digital learning: Youth, identity, and digital media Volume. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Meditation, 13, 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, S., & Kehily, M. J. (2013). Children and young people’s cultural worlds. Bristol: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell, T., Yea, S., Peake, L., Skelton, T., & Smith, M. (2012). Geographies of friendships progress in Human Geography, No 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D. (2013). Social media and personal relationships: Online intimacies and networked friendship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cosslett, R. L. (2013). LinkedIn’s career path for teenagers may get the one direction treatment. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/20/linkedin-career-teenagers-one-direction. Accessed 7 Sept 15.

  • Coulthard, C. (2013). Self-portraits and the social media: The rise of the “selfie.” BBC News Magazine 7 June. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-22511650. Accessed 7 Sept 15.

  • Crampton, J., & Elden, S. (2003). The political mapping of cyberspace. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, J. (2009). Cyber racism: White supremacy online and the new attack on civil right. Plymouth: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debatin, B. (2011). Ethics, privacy and self-restraint in social networking. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C. (2007). Digital relationships in the ‘MySpace’ generation: Results from a qualitative study. http://csis.pace.edu/~dwyer/research/DwyerHICSS2007.pdf

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison N., Lampe C., Steinfield C., & Vitak J. (2010a). With a little help from my friends: How social network sites affect social capital processes. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), The networked self: identity, community, and culture on social network sites. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2010b). With a little help from my friends: How social network sites affect social capital processes. In Z Papacharissi (Ed.) The networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eve, M. (2002). Is friendship a sociological topic? Archives Européenes de Sociologie, XLIII(3), 386–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, A. (2009). Digital diaspora: A race for cyberspace. New York: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, J. (2012). UK riots ‘made worse’ by rolling news, BBM, twitter and facebook. The Guardian. http://goo.gl/ROvjVz. Accessed 15 Feb 15.

  • Hampton, K., Goulet, L. S., Marlow, C., & Rainie, L. (2012). Part 3 the structure of friendship Pew Research Center Internet, Science & Technology. http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/02/03/part-3-the-structure-of-friendship/. Accessed 5 Feb 15.

  • Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2001). Long distance community in the network society contact and support beyond Netville, American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, B. (2008). Analyzing social networks via the internet. In N. Fielding, R. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), Sage handbook of social research methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. (2011). Cyberkids or divided generations? Characterising young people’s internet use in the UK with generic, continuum or typological models. New Media and Society, 13(7), 1104–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P., & Hussain, M. (2013). Democracy’s fourth wave?: Digital media and the Arab Spring. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittani, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., et al. (2010). Hanging out, messing around and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapnek, E (Producer). (2014). Selfie [Television Series]. Hollywood: American Broadcasting Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Online Harassment HBO. https://youtu.be/PuNIwYsz7PI. 21 June 2015.

  • Leib, E. J. (2010). Friend v. friend: The transformation of friendship – and what the law has to do with it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., & West, A. (2009). “Friending”: London-based undergraduates’ experience of facebook. New Media and Society, 11(7), 1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilley, C., Ball, R., & Vernon, H. (2014). The experiences of 11–16 year olds on social networking sites. NSPCC. http://www.nspcc.org.uk/globalassets/documents/research-reports/experiences-11-16-year-olds-social-networking-sites-report.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 15.

  • Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social network sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media and Society, 10(3), 393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Brake, D. R. (2010). On the rapid rise of social networking sites: New findings and policy implications. Children & Society, 24(1), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, M. (2012). Privacy management on social media sites. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/02/24/privacy-management-on-social-media-sites/. Accessed 6 Feb 15.

  • Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malika, H., & Malik, A. S. (2011). Towards identifying the challenges associated with large scale social networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on ambient systems, networks and technologies. Niagara Falls: Procedia Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2011). Tales from facebook. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran-Ellis, J. (2012). Sexting, intimacy and criminal acts: Translating teenage sextualities. In P. Johnson & D. Dalton (Eds.), Policing sex. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, L., & Chow-White, P. (2013). Race after the Internet. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, A. (2013). Children’s friendships. In S. Bragg & M. J. Kehily (Eds.), Children and young people’s cultural worlds. Bristol: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, A., & Kehily, M. J. (2013). Gender, youth and culture: Young masculinities and femininities. NSPCC. http://www.nspcc.org.uk/globalassets/documents/research-reports/experiences-11-16-year-olds-social-networking-sites-report.pdf

  • Neal, S., & Vincent, C. (2013). Multiculture, middle class competencies and friendship practices in super-diverse geographies. Social and Cultural Geography, 14(8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, R. (1998). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Cambridge: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, T. (2012). Project X [Film]. Hollywood: Silver Pictures and Green Hat Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualman, E. (2015). Social media revolution 2015 #Socialnomics [Youtube]. https://www.Youtube.com/watch?v=jottDMuLesU

  • Qualman, E. (2012). Socialnomics: How Social Media transforms the way we live and do business (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskaukas, J., & Stoltz, A. D. (2009). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 564–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, L. (2015). Revenge porn is finally illegal: Who are the victims and perpetrators of this growing phenomenon? The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/04/12/revenge-porn-law_n_6630730.html. Accessed 6 Feb 15.

  • Schor, J. B. (2014). Born to buy: The commercialized child and the new consumer culture. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellgren, K. (2014). Cyberbullying ‘on rise’ – ChildLine BBC [WWW]. http://www.bbc.com/news/education-25639839. Accessed 6 Feb 15.

  • Shin, W. (2013). Parental socialization of children’s Internet use: A qualitative approach. New Media and Society, 17(5), 649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, M. (2014). Rich kids of instagram. New York: Gallery Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stassen Berger, K. (2007). Update on bullying at school: A science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27(1), 90–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (2000). Millennials rising the next great generation. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian. (2014). The top 30 young people in digital media: Nos 10-1. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/mar/17/top-30-young-people-digital-media-nos-10-1. Accessed 6 Feb 15.

  • The Guardian/LSE. (2011). Reading the riots. Investigating England’s summer of disorder. London: Guardian/LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (2009). “Childhood”: Changing and dissonant meanings. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(1), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Safer Internet Centre. (2015). http://www.saferinternet.org.uk/. Accessed 6 Feb 15.

  • Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbeck, R. M., & Johnson, J. H., Jr. (2000). “That’s the only place where you can hang out”: Urban young people and the space of the mall. Urban Geography, 21(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warf, B. (2014). Spaces of telemediated sociability. In J. Craine, P. C. Adams, & J. Dittmer (Eds.), The ashgate research companion to media geography. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. (2015). “Someday you’ll have children just like you”: What tomorrow’s parents can teach us about parental mediation research. Journal of Children and Media, 10(2), 173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Commonwealth Studies, London, UK

    Kavyta Raghunandan

Authors
  1. Kavyta Raghunandan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kavyta Raghunandan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom

    Samantha Punch

  2. The School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

    Robert M. Vanderbeck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of United Kingdom

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Raghunandan, K. (2018). Young People in the Digital Age: Metrics of Friendship. In: Punch, S., Vanderbeck, R. (eds) Families, Intergenerationality, and Peer Group Relations. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 5. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-026-1_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation