Skip to main content

The Political Economy of Teachers in South Asia

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Education Systems in South Asia

Part of the book series: Global Education Systems ((GES))

  • 238 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on teachers in South Asia recognizing the crucial role that they play not only in delivering a quality education but also in implementing educational reform. Teachers in the South Asia Region constitute the largest financial component of the education budget. They are also the key, and more organized, stakeholders (as compared to parents and students who are the ultimate beneficiaries of education) and can actively shape the education environment through their associations and even through their direct participation in politics. Teacher unions and organizations provide an important forum for matters relating to the betterment of the profession but also the advancement of the education environment and ultimately the quality of learning. Using examples from Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan, the chapter highlights how teacher unions and associations in these contexts have championed or hindered the education reform process. The chapter concludes that a collaborative and inclusive policy dialogue ensures that key stakeholders are engaged in the reform process from the inception stage and that they are motivated, rally around, and appropriately implement agendas that improve the quality of learning for students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2014/06/30/poor-quality-education-holding-back-south-asia

  2. 2.

    These findings are based on a sample of over 250,000 children across all rural districts on Pakistan.

  3. 3.

    While previous literature from Pakistan has found that teacher qualifications do not necessarily predict pupil learning or gains in learning, this new piece of evidence is nevertheless important from a policy perspective (see Aslam et al. 2018).

  4. 4.

    These calculations are based mainly on Labour Force Survey data. The sample was restricted to wage workers aged 18 or more and with at least 10 years education in order to capture young teachers with at least 10 years of schooling (especially in poorly resourced rural areas).

  5. 5.

    The multiple varies much across states because although teacher salaries across the Indian states are similar (being based on the recommendations of a Central Pay Commission), per capita income varies enormously across states. For example, Bihar has by far the lowest per capita income among all the states of India.

  6. 6.

    Beteille et al. (2016)

  7. 7.

    On their website (http://www.punjabteachersunion.pk/index.php as on 29 October 2018).

References

  • Activity Based Learning Teachers’ Survey. (2015). IOE Institute of Education. University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alif Ailaan. (2015). Rashid, Ammar, and Mosharraf Zaidi. Reclaiming dignity: The state of teachers’ unions and their future. Rep. Islamabad: Alif Ailaan. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/alifailaan/pages/928/attachments/original/1430285201/TUR-WEB.pdf?1430285201

  • Aslam, M., & Kingdon, G. (2011). What can teachers do to raise student achievement? Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 559–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam, M., & Rawal, S. (2016). Synthesis report on activity based learning, funded by Department For International Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslam, M., Rawal, S., Kingdon, G., Moon, B., Banerji, R., Das, S., Banerji, M., & Sharman S. K. (2016a), Reforms to increase teacher effectiveness in developing countries. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London or The Campbell Collaboration, ix, 122p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslam, M., Rawal, S., Asadullah, N., Bari, F., Kingdon, G., Malik, R., & Rose, P. (2016b). Teacher politics: meeting educational quality challenges with teachers, Report prepared for the Education Commission, September 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslam, M., Malik, R., Rawal, S., Rose, P., & Vignoles, A. (2018). Do government schools improve learning for poor students? Evidence from rural Pakistan. Teaching effectively all children TEACh, REAL Centre (Mimeo), University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atherton, P., & Kingdon, G. (2010). The relative effectiveness and costs of contract and regular teachers in India. CSAE WPS 2010-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atherton, P., & Kingdon, G. (2014). Financing education in South Asia. Mimeo and background paper for H. Dundar, T. Béteille, M. Riboud, & A. Deolalikar (Eds.), Student learning in South Asia: Challenges, opportunities and policy priorities. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annual Status of Education Report Pakistan (2015). Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azam, M., & Kingdon, G. (2015), Assessing teacher quality in India. Journal of Development Economics, 117 , 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bari, F., Raza, R., Aslam, M., Khan, B., & Maqsood, N. (2013). An investigation into teacher recruitment and retention in Punjab. Rep. Lahore: IDEAS. Web. http://ideaspak.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Teacher-Recruitment-and-Retention_Final.pdf

  • Bau, N., & Das, J. (2017). The misallocation of pay and productivity in the public sector: Evidence from the labor market for teachers, RISE WP-17/017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedi, J., & G. Kingdon (2016) The political economy of the scale-up of the ABL programme in Tamil Nadu, A DFID Funded report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béteille, T. (2009). Absenteeism, Transfers and Patronage: The Political Economy of Teacher Labor Markets in India. Dissertation. Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beteille, T., Kingdon, G. G., & Muzammil, M. (2016). Teachers unions in India: Diverse, powerful and coercive. In T. Moe & S. Wiborg (Eds.), The comparative politics of education: Teacher unions and education systems around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Talancé, M. (2017). Better teachers, better results? Evidence from Rural Pakistan. The Journal of Development Studies, 53(10), 1697–1713. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1265944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T. (2007). Teachers and gender gaps in student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 42(3), 528–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dundar, H., Beteille, T., Riboud, M., & Deolalikar, A. (2014). Student learning in South Asia: Challenges, opportunities, and policy priorities (Directions in development; human development). Washington, DC: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/05/19556820/student-learning-south-asia-challenges-opportunities-policy-priorities

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • EdCil. (2008). Teachers’ absence in primary and upper primary schools in Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh: Abridged report. New Delhi: Educational Consultants India Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (2013). Perspective of teachers’ unions on challenges to education in India. Centre for Civil Society working paper no. 304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30, 466–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, Lakshmi and Anandi Mani (2008). Traveling Agents: Political Change and Bureaucratic Turnover in India. Draft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G. (2009). Politics in India. Institute of Education, UCL, Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G. (2010). The impact of the sixth pay commission on teacher salaries: Assessing equity and efficiency effects, RECOUP working paper no. 29, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G. (2017). The private schooling phenomenon in India: A review. Working paper no. 1706, Department of Quantitative Social Science, Institute of Education, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G., & Banerji, R. (2009). School functioning in rural North India: Evidence from school TELLS Survey. Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G., & Muzammil, M. (2009). A political economy of education in India: The case of Uttar Pradesh. Oxford Development Studies, 37(2), 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G. G., & Muzammil, M. (2010). The school governance environment in Uttar Pradesh, India: Implications for teacher accountability and effort. Institute of Education, University of London Mohd. Muzammil Department of Economics, University of Lucknow, RECOUP working paper 31/10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G., & Muzammil, M. (2013). The school governance environment in Uttar Pradesh: Implications for teacher accountability and effort. Journal of Development Studies, 49(2), 251–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G., & Teal, F. (2010). Teacher unions, teacher pay and student performance in India: A pupil fixed effects approach. Journal of Development Economics, 91(2), 278–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G. G., Little, A., Aslam, M., Rawal, S., Moe, T., Patrinos, H., Beteille, T., Banerji, R., Parton, B., & Sharma, S. K. (2014). A rigorous review of the political economy of education systems in developing countries. Final report. Education Rigorous Literature Review. Department for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Languille, S., & Dolan, J. (2012). Political Economy Analysis of the Education Sector in Tanzania, for DFID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkeen, A. (2010). Teachers in Anglophone Africa: Issues in Teacher Supply, Training, and Management. Development Practice in Education. Washington, DC: World Bank. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/13545 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.

  • Muralidharan, K., & Kremer, M. (2008). Public and Private Schools in Rural India. In School Choice International, edited by P. Peterson and R. Chakrabarti. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muralidharan, K., & Sundararaman, V. (2013). Contract teachers: Experimental evidence from India. UC San Diego and NBER, BREAD and JPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muralidharan, K., Das, J., Holla, A., & Mohpal, A. (2017). The fiscal cost of weak governance: Evidence from teacher absence in India. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 116–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCAER. (2008). Deployment and professional competence of para-teachers: Executive summary. New Delhi: National Council of Applied Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Somanathan, R. (2004). Patronage in public administration: Presidential connections, position assignments and the performance of Korean public prosecutors, 1992–2000. Indian Statistical Institute, Planning Unit, New Delhi discussion papers 04-03, Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju, D. (2016). Public school teacher management in Sri Lank: Issues and options, Policy Research working paper no. 7651, World Bank Group, South Asia Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V., Chatterjee, P. G., Ravi, A., Linden, T., Beteille, T., Dey, S., Goyal, S., & Mehta, C. (2015). Teachers in the Indian education system: Synthesis of a nine-state study. New Delhi: National U for Educational Planning and Administration (NUEPA). Rep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, M., & Ritu, S. (2013). Teachers’ professional preparation, income, job satisfaction and performance: An exploratory study. Bangladesh Education Journal, 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawal, S., & Kingdon, G. (2010). Akin to my teacher: does caste, religious or gender distance between student and teacher matter? Some evidence from India. DoQSS working paper 10-18. London: Department of Quantitative Social Science Institute of Education, University of London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawal, S, Aslam, M., & Jamil, B. (2013). Teacher characteristics, actions and perceptions: What matters for student achievement in Pakistan? WPS/2013-19, Centre for the Study of African Economies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankar, D. (2009). Teachers’ time on task and nature of tasks: Evidence from three Indian States. Washington, DC: Human Development Unit, South Asia Region, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. (2009). The internal dynamic. In R. Sharma & V. Ramachandran (Eds.), The elementary education system in India: Exploring institutional structures, processes and dynamics. New Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singal, N., Pedder, D., Malathy, D., Shanmugam, M., Manickavasagam, S., & Govindarasan, M. (2018). Insights from within activity based learning (ABL) classrooms in Tamil Nadu, India: Teachers perspectives and practices. International Journal of Educational Development, 60, 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1985). The market for public office. Why the Indian State is not better at development. World Development, 13, 467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monazza Aslam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Aslam, M., Rawal, S., Kingdon, G. (2020). The Political Economy of Teachers in South Asia. In: Sarangapani, P., Pappu, R. (eds) Handbook of Education Systems in South Asia. Global Education Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3309-5_20-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3309-5_20-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3309-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3309-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics