Skip to main content

Organizational Change as Emergence: A Living Systems Perspective

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Systems Sciences
  • 311 Accesses

Abstract

Contemporary organizational change models and processes have been shaped by the prevailing Newtonian paradigm and have resulted in change itself being treated as an object that can be delivered – change is something done to an organization. While this approach has the merit of clarity and a sense of certainty, it has manifestly failed to deliver, consistently, the intended outcomes.

Living systems offer an alternative lens through which to view both the nature of organizational change and the implications of that for the management of change. Living systems are characterized by uncertainty, nonlinear causation, self-organization, and emergence. These qualities demand that management be aware of wholes rather than employing a reductionist approach focused on parts. Seen through this lens, change can be understood as a quality of the living system itself; an expression of life.

This chapter explores how to cultivate the conditions for, and engage with, emergent change within an organizational setting. Using a gardening metaphor, it explores how those interested in organizational change can work with natural forces to till and fertilize the soil, sow seeds, and nurture the growth of plants, enabling them to flourish. We identify the Gardener leader’s ways of being, thinking, and doing.

Our practice has engaged with the dynamics of emergent change, reflecting the practical application of the underlying principles we identify here. We relate some of these stories to present the concepts and principles in an accessible way to the student or practitioner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beer M, Nohria N (2000) Cracking the code of change. Harv Bus Rev 78:133–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Draper NR (1987) Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Greuter SR, Soulen J (2007) The developmental perspective in integral counseling. Couns Values 51(3):180–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy D, Griffiths A, Benn S (2003) Organizational change for corporate sustainability: a guide for leaders and change agents of the future. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesis 1-26, Holy Bible: King James Version. Accessed online 24 Sept 2016. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-Chapter-1/

  • Heifetz R (1994) Leadership without easy answers. The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz R, Laurie D (1997) The work of leadership. Harv Bus Rev 75:124–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz R, Linsky M (2002) Leadership on the line: staying alive through the dangers of leading. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz R, Grashow A, Linsky M (2009) The pratice of adpative leadership: tools and tactics for changing your organisation and the world. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs M, Rowland D (2005) All changes great and small: Exploring approaches to change and its leadership. J Chang Manag 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010500082902. [Online]

  • Hilborn RC (2004) Seagulls, butterflies, and grasshoppers: a brief history of the butterfly effect in non-linear dynamics. Am J Phys 72:425

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan R (1982) The evolving self: problem and process in human development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn A (1993) Why incentive plans cannot work. Harv Bus Rev 71(5):54–63. 09//Sep/Oct93

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter JP (2007) Leading change. Harv Bus Rev 85:96–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. Univeristy of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y (2009) The wisdom of Laotse. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR, Varela FG, Uribe R (1974) Autopiese: the characterization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems 5:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mclean J (2017) Embedding sustainability into organisational DNA: a story of complexity, Faculty of the Professions, Adelaide Business School, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (1999) Leverage points: places to intervene in a system. Viewed 21 Nov 2018. http://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/

  • Meadows D (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon T (2010) Developmental experiments in individual and collective movement to second tier. J Integral Theory Pract 5(2):149–160. //Summer2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang L, Wells S (2017) A possible journey from inside out?: drawing complex living systems awareness from traditional Chinese knowledge in pursuit of sustainability for China. Int J Sustain Econ Soc Cult Context 13(3):25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks SD (2005) Leadership can be taught: a bold approach for a complex world. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooke D, Torbert W (2005) Seven transformations of leadership. Harv Bus Rev 83:66

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharmer CO (2009) Theory U: leading from the future as it emerges. Berret_Koehler Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharmer CO (2011) The future of change management: 13 propositions. Paper presented at Zeitschrift für Organisationsentwicklung

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (1990) Organizational culture. Am Psychol 45:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (1994) The fifth discipline. Double Day, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith T, Willetts J, Mitchell C (2007) Implications of the synergies between systems theory and permaculture for learning about and acting towards sustainability, ANZSEE conference. Re-inventing sustainability: a climate for change, 3–6 July 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Snorf K, Baye J (2010) Personal change, climate change and human development. J Integral Theory Pract 5(1):61–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells S, Mclean J (2013) One way forward to beat the Newtonian habit with a complexity perspective on organisational change. System 1(4):66–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Wells .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Wells, S., McLean, J. (2020). Organizational Change as Emergence: A Living Systems Perspective. In: Metcalf, G., Kijima, K., Deguchi, H. (eds) Handbook of Systems Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0370-8_16-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0370-8_16-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0370-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0370-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics