Skip to main content

Affirmative Action: Its Nature and Dynamics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 268 Accesses

Abstract

The incidence of affirmative action policies has occurred most frequently in internally heterogeneous states marked by deep ethno-cultural divisions and in which one of the ethno-cultural communities tended to dominate the rest. The response has led to the adoption of affirmative action programs to rectify old wrongs and eradicate injustices and extend benefits and provide special preferences toward establishing a new, just, and equal society. Alternative views of equality and justice undergird much of the controversy over affirmative action. Justice and equality are commonly shared calls evoked by both proponents and opponents of affirmative action. However, there are no universal and generally accepted set of values which define justice and equality. Lacking commensurability, rival meanings are almost always caught up in contentious struggles over power and resources in affirmative action programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Anderson TH (2004) The pursuit of fairness: a history of affirmative action. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell T (2000) Justice. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen C (1998) The corruption that is group preference. Acad Quest 11(summer):14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen C, Sterba J (2003) Affirmative action and racial preferences: a debate. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullinwider RK (1975) Preferential hiring and compensation. Soc Theory Pract 3(spring):307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullinwider RK (1980) The reverse discrimination controversy: a moral and legal analysis. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer N (1975) Affirmative discrimination: ethnic inequality and public policy. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer N (1983) Individual rights and group rights. In: Glazer N (ed) Ethnic dilemmas. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A (1976) Affirmative action. Philos Public Aff 5(winter):178–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A (1979) Justice and reverse discrimination. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez T (2012) In: Premdas R (ed) Affirmative action, ethnicity, and conflict. Routledge, London

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez T, Premdas R (eds) (2012) Introduction: affirmative action, horizontal inequality and equitable development, in Gomez and Premdas, op.cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinier L, Sturm S (2001) Who’s qualified? Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta D (1998) Recasting reservations in the language of rights. In: Mahajan G (ed) Democracy, difference, and social justice. Oxford, Mumbai,Ibid.p.509

    Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson I (2005) When affirmative action was white: an untold history of racial inequality in the twentieth century America. W.W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellough JE (2006) Understanding affirmative action: politics, discrimination, and the search for justice. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Loury G (1987) Why should we care about group inequality. In: Miller P, Ahrens J (eds) Equal opportunity. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1973) Equal treatment and compensatory discrimination. Philos Public Aff 2(summer):348–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R (1972) Anarchy, state, and utopia. Blackwell Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh S (2012) Poverty, equality, and affirmative action in India, in Gomez and Premdas, op.cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson O (1998) The ordeal of integration: progress and resentment in America. Basic Civitas books, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips A (1996) Which equalities matter? Polity Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pojman L (1992) The moral status of affirmative action. Public Aff Q 6(April):181–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Pojman L (1998) The case against affirmative action. Int J Appl Philos 12(spring):97–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premdas R (2010) Ethnic conflict. In: Collins PH, Solomos J (eds) The Sage handbook of race and ethnic studies. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Premdas R (2016) Social justice and affirmative action, review. Ethn Racial Stud 39(3):449–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratuva S (2013) Politics of preferential development: trans-global study of affirmative action and ethnic conflict in Fiji, Malaysia and South Africa. Australian University Press, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld M (1991) Affirmative action and justice: a philosophical and constitutional inquiry. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan A (1993) Justice. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1992) Inequality examined. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher G (1979) Reverse discrimination, the future, and the past. Ethics 90(October):81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth DL (1997) Reservations Policy Revisited in Democracy, Difference and Social Justice edited by Gurpreet Manhajan. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 489–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrentny JD (1996) The ironies of affirmative action: politics, culture, and justice in America. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skrentny JD (ed) (2001) Color lines: affirmative action, immigration, and civil rights options for America. university of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell T (2004) Affirmative action around the world. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterba JP (2003) Defending affirmative action, defending preferences. J Soc Philos 34(June):285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1994) The politics of recognition. In: Guttman A (ed) Multiculturalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waltzer M (1983) Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Westen P (1985) The concept of equality. Ethics 95:830–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young IM (1990) Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Premdas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Premdas, R. (2019). Affirmative Action: Its Nature and Dynamics. In: Ratuva, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Ethnicity. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0242-8_141-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0242-8_141-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0242-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0242-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics