Abstract
Academic development has been described as a fragmented enterprise (Rowland 2002; Webb 1992; Lee et al. 2008) as a means of recognizing the messy discursive terrain navigated by its subjects. These subjects are those persons commonly referred to as academic or educational developers, and they work under a banner which is conceived institutionally in response to the change agendas which have been assigned to the role(s) (Gibbs 2013). Given that academic development roles are typically associated with change, its fragmented status is a reflection of the multitude of discursive sites that academic development subjects must navigate in their everyday practice. I will be using Rowland’s (2002) metaphor “fault lines” to describe common discursive binaries where academic development subjects are positioned through interaction with other members of the institution (e.g., teachers, management, students, educational development colleagues). I will be arguing that academic development pedagogy can be reconceptualized as subject’s (individual academic developer’s) tactical responses to their discursive positioning(s).
The chapter will explore the concept of fragmentation in the form of a composite literature review and auto-ethnographic narrative. The literature review will be interrupted by a series of auto-ethnographic vignettes (Richardson and St. Pierre 2005) written from the perspective of an academic development subject who has worked in a variety of academic development positions at three Australian higher education institutions. These vignettes will recount instances of everyday practice performed under the banner of academic development; performed at various binary fault lines. For the intended readership of academic managers, academic teaching staff and persons employed as academic/educational developers; this chapter seeks to provide a perspective of academic development pedagogy as an identity performed navigating discursive fault lines.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amundsen, C., and M. Wilson. 2012. Are we asking the right questions?: A conceptual review of the educational development literature in higher education. Review of Educational Research 82 (1): 90–126. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312438409.
Bath, D., and C. Smith. 2004. Academic developers: An academic tribe claiming their territory in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development 9 (1): 9–27.
Bleiker, R. 2003. Discourse and human agency. Contemporary Political Thought 2 (1): 25–47.
Britzman, D. P. 2003. Practice makes practice a critical study of learning to teach. From http://site.ebrary.com/id/10594717.
Butler, J. 1999. Gender trouble feminism and the subversion of identity. From http://site.ebrary.com/id/10054731.
Caldwell, R. 2007. Agency and change: Re-evaluating Foucault’s legacy. Organization 14 (6): 769–791.
Cherryholmes, C.H. 1988. Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Davies, B. 2000. A body of writing, 1990–1999. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Davies, B., and R. Harre. 1990. Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63.
Derrida, J. 1976. Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ellsworth, E.A. 2005. Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Foucault, M. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications.
Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. 1991. The Foucault reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Gillespie, K. J., D. L. Robertson, and W. H. Bergquist. 2010. A guide to faculty development. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Gordon Institute of TAFE. 2009. Teacher handbook. http://medusa.ballarat.edu.au/wordpress/taa2010group1/files/2010/04/tl-rd-8-teachers-handbook-2009.pdf.
Gosling, D. 2003. Philosophical approaches to academic development. In The scholarship of academic development, ed. H. Eggins and R. Macdonald, 70–79. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Harland, T., and D. Staniforth. 2008. A family of strangers: The fragmented nature of academic development. Teaching in Higher Education 13 (6): 669–678.
Holt, D., S. Palmer, and D. Challis. 2011. Changing perspectives: Teaching and learning centres’ strategic contributions to academic development in Australian higher education. International Journal for Academic Development 16 (1): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.546211.
Jobslift Australia. 2011. AO9 – Learning designer – Box Hill Institute of TAFE. From http://au.jobslift.com/job_ao9-learning-designer-box-hill-institute-of-tafe-melbourne-vic-1000492221.html.
Land, R. 2001. Agency, context and change in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development 6 (1): 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440110033715.
Lather, P. 2003. Applied Derrida: (Mis)Reading the work of mourning in educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory 35 (3): 257–270.
Lee, A., C. Manathunga, and P. Kandlbinder. 2008. Making a place: An oral history of academic development in Australia. Milperra: HERDSA.
Leibowitz, B. 2014. Reflections on academic development: What is in a name? International Journal for Academic Development 19 (4): 357–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2014.969978.
Ling, P., and Council of Australian Directors of Academic Development. 2009. Development of academics and higher education futures. Hawthorn: Swinburne University of Technology.
Manathunga, C. 2006. Doing educational development ambivalently: Applying post-colonial metaphors to educational development? International Journal for Academic Development 11 (1): 19–29.
Manathunga, C. 2007. “Unhomely” academic developer identities: More post-colonial explorations. International Journal for Academic Development 12 (1): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440701217287.
Manathunga, C. 2011. The field of educational development: Histories and critical questions. Studies in Continuing Education 33 (3): 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037x.2011.613375.
Moses, I. 1985. Academic development units and the improvement of teaching. Higher Education 14 (1): 75–100.
Ouellett, M.L. 2010. Overview of faculty development: History and choices. In A guide to faculty development, ed. K.J. Gillespie and D.L. Robertson, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Parkes, R.J., J. Gore, and W. Elsworth. 2010. After poststructuralism: Rethinking the discourse of social justice pedagogy. In Social justice pedagogy across the curriculum: The practice of freedom, ed. T.K. Chapman and N. Hobbel. New York: Routledge.
Richardson, L., and E.A. St. Pierre. 2005. Writing: A method of inquiry. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, eds. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 3rd ed. pp. 959–978. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Rowland, S. 2002. Overcoming fragmentation in professional life: The challenge for academic development. Higher Education Quarterly 56 (1): 52–64.
Rowland, S. 2003. Academic development: A practical or theoretical business? In The scholarship of academic development, ed. H.M.R. Eggins, 13–22. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Sorcinelli, M., A. Austin, P. Eddy, and A. Beach. 2006. Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Victoria University. 2012. Learning & teaching portal – Staff contacts. Retrieved 30 Aug 2012, from http://tls.vu.edu.au/portal/staffindex.aspx.
Webb, G. 1992. On pretexts for higher education development activities. Higher Education 24 (3): 351–361.
Webb, G. 1996. Theories of staff development: Progress and power. International Journal for Academic Development 1 (2): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144960010208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Linquist, S. (2018). Academic Development: A Space, But Is It an Identity?. In: Bossu, C., Brown, N. (eds) Professional and Support Staff in Higher Education. University Development and Administration. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6858-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6858-4_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6856-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6858-4
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education