Advertisement

Nanoindentation and Indentation Size Effects: Continuum Model and Atomistic Simulation

  • Chi-Hua Yu
  • Kuan-Po Lin
  • Chuin-Shan Chen
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Nanoindentation is one of the most widely used methods to measure the mechanical properties of materials at the nanoscale. For spherical indenters, when radius decreases, the hardness increases. The phenomenon is known as the indentation size effect (ISE). Nix and Gao developed a continuum model to explain the ISE in microindentation. However, the model overestimates the hardness at the nanoscale. The objective of this study is to develop proper methods to probe key quantities such as hardness and geometric necessary dislocation (GND) density from the quasi-static version of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and to develop a mechanism-based model to elucidate the ISE phenomenon at the nanoscale. A reliable method is presented to extract the GND directly from dislocation length and the volume of plastic zone in the MD simulations. We conclude that the hardness determined directly from MD simulations matches well with the hardness determined from the Oliver–Pharr method. The ISE can be observed directly from the MD simulations without any free parameters. The model by Swadener et al. rooted from the Nix and Gao model underestimates the GND density at the nanoscale. However, this model can accurately predict the hardness size effects in nanoindentation if it uses the GND density directly calculated from the MD simulations.

Keywords

Nanoindentation size effect Molecular dynamics simulations Geometrically necessary dislocation density Hardness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan. We are also grateful to the National Center for High-Performance Computing for providing the computational resources required for this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Feng G, Nix WD. Indentation size effect in MgO. Scr Mater. 2004;51(6):599–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li X, Bhushan B. A review of nanoindentation continuous stiffness measurement technique and its applications. Mater Charact. 2002;48(1):11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mook WM, et al. Compression of freestanding gold nanostructures: from stochastic yield to predictable flow. Nanotechnology. 2010;21(5):055701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fischer-Cripps AC, SpringerLink (Online service). Nanoindentation. 3rd ed. Mechanical engineering series 1. New York: Springer; 2011. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pharr GM. Measurement of mechanical properties by ultra-low load indentation. Mater Sci Eng A. 1998;253(1–2):151–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pethicai J, Hutchings R, Oliver W. Hardness measurement at penetration depths as small as 20 nm. Philos Mag A. 1983;48(4):593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oliver WC, Pharr GM. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res. 1992;7(06):1564–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oliver WC, Pharr GM. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J Mater Res. 2004;19(1): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee C, et al. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science. 2008;321(5887):385–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li X, et al. Nanoindentation of silver nanowires. Nano Lett. 2003;3(11):1495–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Turner CH, et al. The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar: results from two microscopic measurement techniques. J Biomech. 1999;32(4):437–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu T, Li J. Ultra-strength materials. Prog Mater Sci. 2010;55(7):710–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shan ZW, et al. Mechanical annealing and source-limited deformation in submicrometre-diameter Ni crystals. Nat Mater. 2008;7(2):115–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greer JR. Bridging the gap between computational and experimental length scales: a review on nanoscale plasticity. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2006;13(1):59–70.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ashby MF. Deformation of plastically non-homogeneous materials. Philos Mag. 1970;21(170): 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nye JF. Some geometrical relations in dislocated crystals. Acta Metall. 1953;1(2):153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nix WD, Gao H. Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids. 1998;46(3):411–25.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tymiak NI, et al. Plastic strain and strain gradients at very small indentation depths. Acta Mater. 2001;49(6):1021–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baker SP, Vinci RP, Arias T. Elastic and anelastic behavior of materials in small dimensions. MRS Bull. 2002;27(1):26–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elmustafa AA, Stone DS. Indentation size effect in polycrystalline F.C.C. metals. Acta Mater. 2002;50(14):3641–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gerberich WW, et al. Interpretations of indentation size effects. J Appl Mech-Trans ASME. 2002;69(4):433–42.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Choi Y, et al. Size effects on the onset of plastic deformation during nanoindentation of thin films and patterned lines. J Appl Phys. 2003;94(9):6050–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Elmustafa AA, Stone DS. Nanoindentation and the indentation size effect: kinetics of deformation and strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids. 2003;51(2):357–81.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peng Z, Gong J, Miao H. On the description of indentation size effect in hardness testing for ceramics: analysis of the nanoindentation data. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2004;24(8):2193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Durst K, Backes B, Göken M. Indentation size effect in metallic materials: correcting for the size of the plastic zone. Scr Mater. 2005;52(11):1093–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Soer WA, Aifantis KE, De Hosson JTM. Incipient plasticity during nanoindentation at grain boundaries in body-centered cubic metals. Acta Mater. 2005;53(17):4665–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang B, Vehoff H. Grain size effects on the mechanical properties of nanonickel examined by nanoindentation. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;400–401(Suppl 1–2):467–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lilleodden ET, Nix WD. Microstructural length-scale effects in the nanoindentation behavior of thin gold films. Acta Mater. 2006;54(6):1583–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang JL, et al. Size effect in contact compression of nano- and microscale pyramid structures. Acta Mater. 2006;54(15):3973–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Abu Al-Rub RK. Prediction of micro and nanoindentation size effect from conical or pyramidal indentation. Mech Mater. 2007;39(8):787–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Durst K, Goken M, Pharr GM. Indentation size effect in spherical and pyramidal indentations. J Phys D-Appl Phys. 2008;41(7):074005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Demir E, et al. Investigation of the indentation size effect through the measurement of the geometrically necessary dislocations beneath small indents of different depths using EBSD tomography. Acta Mater. 2009;57(2):559–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Qiao XG, Starink MJ, Gao N. The influence of indenter tip rounding on the indentation size effect. Acta Mater. 2010;58(10):3690–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Swadener JG, George EP, Pharr GM. The correlation of the indentation size effect measured with indenters of various shapes. J Mech Phys Solids. 2002;50(4):681–94.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stelmashenko NA, et al. Microindentations on W and Mo oriented single crystals: an STM study. Acta Metall Mater. 1993;41(10):2855–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    McElhaney KW, Vlassak JJ, Nix WD. Determination of indenter tip geometry and indentation contact area for depth-sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res. 1998;13(05):1300–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Durst K, et al. Indentation size effect in metallic materials: modeling strength from pop-in to macroscopic hardness using geometrically necessary dislocations. Acta Mater. 2006;54(9): 2547–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Huang Y, et al. A nano-indentation model for spherical indenters. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2007;15(1):S255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li X, et al. Dislocation nucleation governed softening and maximum strength in nano-twinned metals. Nature. 2010;464(7290):877–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kallman JS, et al. Molecular dynamics of silicon indentation. Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1993;47(13):7705–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Horstemeyer MF, Baskes MI, Plimpton SJ. Length scale and time scale effects on the plastic flow of fcc metals. Acta Mater. 2001;49(20):4363–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Liang HY, et al. Crystalline plasticity on copper (001), (110), and (111) surfaces during nanoindentation. CMES-Comput Model Eng Sci. 2004;6(1):105–14.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lee Y, et al. Atomistic simulations of incipient plasticity under Al(1 1 1) nanoindentation. Mech Mater. 2005;37(10):1035–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yamakov V, et al. Length-scale effects in the nucleation of extended dislocations in nanocrystalline Al by molecular-dynamics simulation. Acta Mater. 2001;49(14):2713–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gannepalli A, Mallapragada SK. Atomistic studies of defect nucleation during nanoindentation of Au(001). Phys Rev B. 2002;66(10):1041031–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lilleodden ET, et al. Atomistic simulations of elastic deformation and dislocation nucleation during nanoindentation. J Mech Phys Solids. 2003;51(5):901–20.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nair AK, et al. Size effects in indentation response of thin films at the nanoscale: a molecular dynamics study. Int J Plast. 2008;24(11):2016–31.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gao Y, et al. Comparative simulation study of the structure of the plastic zone produced by nanoindentation. J Mech Phys Solids. 2015;75(0):58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Honeycutt JD, Andersen HC. Molecular-dynamics study of melting and freezing of small Lennard-Jones clusters. J Phys Chem. 1987;91(19):4950–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kelchner CL, Plimpton SJ, Hamilton JC. Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation. Phys Rev B. 1998;58(17):11085–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ackland GJ, Jones AP. Applications of local crystal structure measures in experiment and simulation. PhRvB. 2006;73(5). Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Stukowski A, Albe K. Extracting dislocations and non-dislocation crystal defects from atomistic simulation data. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2010;18(8):085001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shewchuk JR. Triangle: Engineering a 2D quality mesh generator and Delaunay triangulator. 1996;1148:203–22. Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Taylor GI. Plastic strain in metals. J Inst Met. 1938;62:307–24.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dieter GE, Bacon DJ. Mechanical metallurgy. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Plimpton S. Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics. JCoPh. 1995;117(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039.
  57. 57.
    Baskes MI. Modified embedded-atom potentials for cubic materials and impurities. Phys Rev B. 1992;46(5):2727–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS. Embedded-atom-method functions for the fcc metals cu, ag, au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. Phys Rev B. 1986;33(12):7983–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.R&D divisionCoreTech. (Moldex3D)HsinchuTaiwan
  2. 2.Structural EngineeringUniveristy of CaliforiniaSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations