Advertisement

Processes in Nano-Length-Scale Copper Crystal Under Dynamic Loads: A Molecular Dynamics Study

  • I F Golovnev
  • E I Golovneva
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to the research of rotary field formation in a nano-length-scale metal crystal under acting of different kinds of mechanical loads by molecular dynamics method. It was considered two sorts of loads: compressive dynamic load and stretching at a constant deformation velocity. The simulation technique of such vortex structures in solid was developed. It is shown that there exists a critical energy flux at which the system experiences an avalanche change both in the time and load dependence of energy absorption and in the type of wave processes in its structure. It was revealed that this process is a type of nanostructure self-organization in response to an external energy flux with subsequent development of a strong rotational field. The critical role of a rotary wave in the process of material fracture was defined, as the rotary wave energy exceeds 30% of the total internal energy of the structure at the strain rate greater than 200 m/s. The interpretation of vortex structure formation and spread in solids is proposed from the point of view of structure self-organization. The authors studied the structure size influence on rotary field formation, and it was revealed their appearance is not a result of nanoscale smallness of the sample. At the same time, the influence of a nanostructure’s cross size on the rotary field energy is being researched.

Keywords

Molecular dynamics method Metal nanostructures Dynamic load Rotary field Size influence Mesoanalysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Panin VE, Egorushkin VE. Phys Mesomech. 2013;16(3):5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eidel B, Hartmaier A, Gumbsch P. Multiscale Model Plast Fract Means Dislocat Mech CISM Int Centre Mech Sci. 2010;522:1–57.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang L-Y, Li Y, Cao Y-P, Feng X-Q, Gao H. J Appl Mech. 2013;80(6).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023977061018.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    D. Huang, M. Wang, G. Lu, J. Nanomater. 2014;7.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/732434732434.
  6. 6.
    Ravi-Chandar K. Dynamic fracture. Oxford: Elsevier; 2004. p. 219. ISBN: 0–08–044352-4Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Egorushkin VE, Panin VE, Savushkin EV, Khon YA. Russ Phys J. 1987;30(1):5–16.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Korteveg DJ, de Vries G. Phil Mag. 1895;39(5):422–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Egorushkin VE. Russ Phys J. 1992;35(4):316–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panin VE, Egorushkin VE, Panin AV. Physics-Uspekhi. 2012;55(12):1260–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Golovnev IF, Golovneva EI, Merzhievsky LA, Fomin VM. Phys Mesomech. 2013;16(4):294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Golovnev IF, Golovneva EI, Merzhievsky LA. News Altai State Univ. 2014;1(81):40–2.  https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2014)1.1-08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Golovnev IF, Golovneva EI, Merzhievsky LA, Fomin VM, Panin VE. Phys Mesomech. 2015;18(3):179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.F. Voter. Embedded atom method potentials for seven FCC metals: Ni, Pd, Pt, Cu, Ag, Au, and Al, Los Alamos unclassified technical report # LA-UR 93-3901. 1993.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Golovnev IF, Golovneva EI, Fomin VM. Phys Mesomech. 2003;6(5–6):41–5.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Golovneva EI, Golovnev IF, Fomin VM. Comput Mater Sci. 2015;97:109–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P, editors. Nanotechnology research directions: IWGN workshop report. Vision for nanotechnology R&D in the next decade. Dordrecht/ Boston/London: Kluwer Academic; 2000.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhuo XR, Beom HG. Materials science and engineering A-structural materials properties microstructure and processing. 2015;636:470–75.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sadeghian H, Goosen JFL, Bossche A, Thijsse BJ, van Keulen F. Effects of size and surface on the elasticity of silicon nanoplates: molecular dynamics and semi-continuum approaches. Thin Solid Films. 2011;520(I.1):391–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang D, Qiao P. Mechanical behavior and size sensitivity of Nanocrystalline nickel wires using molecular dynamics simulation. J Aerosp Eng. 2011;24(I.2):147–53.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tang T, Kim S, Horstemeyer MF, Wang P. Atomistic modeling of crack growth in magnesium single crystal. Eng Fract Mech. 2011;78(I.1):191–2011.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tang T, Kim S, Horstemeyer M F, Wang P. A molecular dynamics study of fracture behavior in magnesium single crystal. In: Magnesium technology. Book Series: Magnesium Technology Series. Conference: Conference on Magnesium Technology held during TMS 140th Annual Meeting and Exhibition; 2011. p. 349–55.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tang T, Kim S, Horstemeyer MF. Molecular dynamics simulations of void growth and coalescence in single crystal magnesium. Acta Mater. 2010;58(I.14):4742–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sadeghian H, Yang Chung-Kai, Goosen, JFL, Bossche A, Staufer U, French PJ, van Keulen F. Effects of size and defects on the elasticity of silicon nanocantilevers. J Micromech Microeng. Conference: 20th Micromechanics Europe Workshop (MME 09). 2010;20 I.6:064012.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/20/6/064012.
  25. 25.
    Sadeghian H, Goosen JFL, Bossche A, Thijsse BJ, van Keulen F. Size-dependent elastic behavior of silicon nanofilms: molecular dynamics study. In: IMECE 2009: Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 2010;12 parts A and B:151–6.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    I-Ling C, Yu-Chiao C. Is the molecular statics method suitable for the study of nanomaterials? A study case of nanowires. Nanotechnology. 18(I.31):315701.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/31/315701.
  27. 27.
    Golovnev IF, Golovneva EI, Fomin VM. The influence of a nanocrystal size on the results of molecular-dynamics modeling. Comput Mater Sci. 2006;36:176–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.12.082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Potirniche GP, Horstemeyer MF, Wagner GJ, Gullett PM. A molecular dynamics study of void growth and coalescence in single crystal nickel. Int J Plast. 2006;22(I.2):257–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wu HA, Soh AK, Wang XX, Sun ZH. Strength and fracture of single crystal metal nanowire. In: Kishimoto K et al., editor. Advances in fracture and failure prevention. Conference. Book Series: Key engineering materials. 2004;p. 261–263. Part 1&2:33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Golovnev IF, Golovneva EI, Fomin VM. Comput Mater Sci. 2015;110:302–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Golovnev IF, Golovneva EI, Merzhievsky LA. Phys Mesomech. 2016;19(5):66–72. (in Russian).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics SB RASNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations