Skip to main content

Institutional Ethnography

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences
  • 505 Accesses

Abstract

Institutional ethnography (IE), a form of critical ethnography introduced to the social sciences in the late 1990s by Canadian sociologist Dorothy J. Smith, poises researchers to uncover how “work” (a concept defined generously) is co-constituted within institutional environments. The IE approach reframes institutional sites as dynamic shape shifters that use texts to mediate, organize, and lend value to the social practices of diverse and knowing individuals. Workplaces and practices can be said to reproduce the broader spheres of influence, prestige, and value that structure society at large. As such, IE seeks out the (often implicit and/or erased) connections between work processes and institutional discourses, revealing how work is coordinated across time and space. More plainly, the methodology uncovers how things happen – how institutional discourse compels and shapes practice(s) and/or how norms of practice speak to, for, and over individuals. IE research offers opportunities for more situated and finely grained understandings of the sites where we work, the people we work most closely with, the generative power of institutional texts and discourse, and the ways that our participation in work then gives material face to the institutions that govern the social world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brodkey L. Academic writing as social practice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotman SL. An institutional ethnography of elder care: understanding access from the standpoint of ethnic and “racial” minority women. PhD diss, University of Toronto; 2000. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp03/NQ50005.pdf.

  • Campbell M. Dorothy Smith and knowing the world we live in. J Sociol Soc Welf. 2003;30(1): 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell M, Gregor F. Mapping social relations: a primer in doing institutional ethnography. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devault ML. What is institutional ethnography? Soc Probl. 2006;53(3):294–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devault ML. People at work: life, power, and social inclusion in the new economy. New York: New York University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault ML, Gross G. Feminist qualitative interviewing: experience, talk, and knowledge. In: Hesse-Biber SN, editor. Handbook of feminist research: theory and praxis. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2012. p. 206–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault ML, McCoy L. Institutional ethnography: using interviews to investigate ruling relations. In: Smith DE, editor. Institutional ethnography as practice. London: Rowman & Littlefield; 2006. p. 15–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C. Deep hanging out. The New York review of books. October 22, 1998. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1998/10/22/deep-hanging-out/.

  • Griffith AI, Smith DE. Under new public management: institutional ethnographies of changing front-line work. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersly M. Ethnography: problems and prospects. Ethnogr Educ. 2006;1(1):3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway D. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem Stud. 1988;14(3):575–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding S. Introduction: standpoint theory as a site of political, philosophic, and scientific debate. In: Harding S, editor. Feminist standpoint theory reader: intellectual and political controversies. New York: Routledge; 2004. p. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawulich BB. Participant observation as a data collection method. FORUM Qual Soc Res. 2005;6(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance M, Nicolas M. Institutional ethnography as materialist framework for writing program research and the faculty-staff work standpoints project. Coll Compos Commun. 2012;64(1): 130–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte MD, Goetz JP. Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Rev Educ Res. 1982;52(1):31–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubet S. Interrogating ethnography: why evidence matters. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luken PC, Vaughan S. ‘… Be a genuine homemaker in your own home’: gender and familial relations in state housing practices, 1917–1922. Soc Forces. 2005;83(4):1603–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International publishers; 1852; 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader L. Up the anthropologist: perspectives gained from ‘studying up’. In: Hymes D, editor. Reinventing anthropology. New York: Random House; 1969. p. 284–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader L. Ethnography as theory. HAU J Ethnogr Theory. 2011;1(1):211–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DE. Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociol Inq. 1974;44(1):7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DE. Texts and the ontology of organizations and institutions. Stud Cult Organ Soc. 2001;7(2):159–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DE. Institutional ethnography: a sociology for people. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DE. Institutional ethnography as practice. New York: Rowman & Littlefield; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall S. Focused ethnography: a methodological adaptation for social research in emerging contexts. FORUM Qual Social Res. 2015;16(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright UT, Rocco TS. Institutional ethnography: a holistic approach to understanding systems. Int J Adult Vocat Educ Technol. 2016;7(3):27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle LaFrance .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

LaFrance, M. (2019). Institutional Ethnography. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_82

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics