Abstract
Institutional ethnography (IE), a form of critical ethnography introduced to the social sciences in the late 1990s by Canadian sociologist Dorothy J. Smith, poises researchers to uncover how “work” (a concept defined generously) is co-constituted within institutional environments. The IE approach reframes institutional sites as dynamic shape shifters that use texts to mediate, organize, and lend value to the social practices of diverse and knowing individuals. Workplaces and practices can be said to reproduce the broader spheres of influence, prestige, and value that structure society at large. As such, IE seeks out the (often implicit and/or erased) connections between work processes and institutional discourses, revealing how work is coordinated across time and space. More plainly, the methodology uncovers how things happen – how institutional discourse compels and shapes practice(s) and/or how norms of practice speak to, for, and over individuals. IE research offers opportunities for more situated and finely grained understandings of the sites where we work, the people we work most closely with, the generative power of institutional texts and discourse, and the ways that our participation in work then gives material face to the institutions that govern the social world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brodkey L. Academic writing as social practice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1987.
Brotman SL. An institutional ethnography of elder care: understanding access from the standpoint of ethnic and “racial” minority women. PhD diss, University of Toronto; 2000. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp03/NQ50005.pdf.
Campbell M. Dorothy Smith and knowing the world we live in. J Sociol Soc Welf. 2003;30(1): 3–22.
Campbell M, Gregor F. Mapping social relations: a primer in doing institutional ethnography. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 2002.
Devault ML. What is institutional ethnography? Soc Probl. 2006;53(3):294–8.
Devault ML. People at work: life, power, and social inclusion in the new economy. New York: New York University Press; 2008.
DeVault ML, Gross G. Feminist qualitative interviewing: experience, talk, and knowledge. In: Hesse-Biber SN, editor. Handbook of feminist research: theory and praxis. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2012. p. 206–36.
DeVault ML, McCoy L. Institutional ethnography: using interviews to investigate ruling relations. In: Smith DE, editor. Institutional ethnography as practice. London: Rowman & Littlefield; 2006. p. 15–43.
Geertz C. Deep hanging out. The New York review of books. October 22, 1998. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1998/10/22/deep-hanging-out/.
Griffith AI, Smith DE. Under new public management: institutional ethnographies of changing front-line work. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2014.
Hammersly M. Ethnography: problems and prospects. Ethnogr Educ. 2006;1(1):3–14.
Haraway D. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem Stud. 1988;14(3):575–99.
Harding S. Introduction: standpoint theory as a site of political, philosophic, and scientific debate. In: Harding S, editor. Feminist standpoint theory reader: intellectual and political controversies. New York: Routledge; 2004. p. 1–15.
Kawulich BB. Participant observation as a data collection method. FORUM Qual Soc Res. 2005;6(2).
LaFrance M, Nicolas M. Institutional ethnography as materialist framework for writing program research and the faculty-staff work standpoints project. Coll Compos Commun. 2012;64(1): 130–50.
LeCompte MD, Goetz JP. Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Rev Educ Res. 1982;52(1):31–60.
Lubet S. Interrogating ethnography: why evidence matters. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018.
Luken PC, Vaughan S. ‘… Be a genuine homemaker in your own home’: gender and familial relations in state housing practices, 1917–1922. Soc Forces. 2005;83(4):1603–25.
Marx, K. The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International publishers; 1852; 1913.
Nader L. Up the anthropologist: perspectives gained from ‘studying up’. In: Hymes D, editor. Reinventing anthropology. New York: Random House; 1969. p. 284–31.
Nader L. Ethnography as theory. HAU J Ethnogr Theory. 2011;1(1):211–9.
Smith DE. Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociol Inq. 1974;44(1):7–13.
Smith DE. Texts and the ontology of organizations and institutions. Stud Cult Organ Soc. 2001;7(2):159–98.
Smith DE. Institutional ethnography: a sociology for people. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 2005.
Smith DE. Institutional ethnography as practice. New York: Rowman & Littlefield; 2006.
Wall S. Focused ethnography: a methodological adaptation for social research in emerging contexts. FORUM Qual Social Res. 2015;16(1).
Wright UT, Rocco TS. Institutional ethnography: a holistic approach to understanding systems. Int J Adult Vocat Educ Technol. 2016;7(3):27–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
LaFrance, M. (2019). Institutional Ethnography. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_82
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_82
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5250-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5251-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences