Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Symbolic Interactionism as a Methodological Framework

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

Abstract

Symbolic interactionism is theoretical perspective in sociology that addresses the manner in which society is generated and maintained through face-to-face, repeated, meaningful interactions among individuals. In this chapter, we discuss symbolic interactionism as a methodological framework. We first provide a brief summary of interactionist thought, describing the general tenets and propositions that have defined the perspective over time. Next, we discuss methods commonly employed by symbolic interactionists, noting how the interactionist perspective informs and guides sociologists in empirical research. We discuss how symbolic interactionists employ a wide variety of methods to understand both intra- and interpersonal processes, and how methodological approaches in symbolic interactionism vary in terms of their inductive or deductive style, idiographic or nomothetic causal explanation, and quantitative or qualitative research design. We address five main methods that are commonly used in symbolic interactionist studies: interviews, surveys, ethnographies, content analysis, and experiments. Future directions of the perspective are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asencio EK, Burke PJ. Does incarceration change the criminal identity? A synthesis of labeling and identity theory perspectives on identity change. Sociol Perspect. 2011;54:163–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie E. The practice of social research. 14th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning Publishers; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton B, Hardesty CL. Spirituality and stripping: exotic dancers narrate the body Ekstasis. Symb Interact. 2010;33(2):280–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker HS. Becoming a marijuana user. Am J Sociol. 1953;59:235–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker HS, Geer B, Hughes EC, Strauss AL. Boys in white: student culture in medical school. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers; 2009 [1961].

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzies KM, Allen MN. Symbolic interactionism as a theoretical perspective for multiple method research. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33(4):541–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg BL, Lune H. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 8th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger P, Luckmann T. The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor Books; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke PJ. Interaction in small groups. In: DeLamater JD, editor. Handbook of social psychology. New York: Kluwer-Plenum; 2003. p. 363–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke PJ, Cast AD. Stability and change in the gender identities of newly married couples. Soc Psychol Q. 1997;60(4):277–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke PJ, Harrod MM. Too much of a good thing? Soc Psychol Q. 2005;68:359–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke PJ, Stets JE. Trust and commitment through self-verification. Soc Psychol Q. 1999;62(4): 347–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke PJ, Stets JE. Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burke PJ, Tully JC. The measurement of role identity. Soc Forces. 1977;55(4):881–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MJ. Advancing identity theory: examining the relationship between activated identities and behavior in different social contexts. Soc Psychol Q. 2013;76:203–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272513493095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MJ. An autoethnographic analysis of sports identity change. Sport Soc. 2016;19(10): 1667–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2016.1179733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MJ, Fuller C. Symbols, meaning, and action: the past, present, and future of symbolic interactionism. Curr Sociol Rev. 2016;64(6):931–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116638396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MJ, Mireles DC. Deaf identity and depression. In: Stets JE, Serpe RT, editors. New directions in identity theory and research. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016a. p. 509–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MJ, Mireles DC. Examining the relationship between deaf identity verification processes and self-esteem. Identity. 2016b;16(2):102–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cast AD, Stets JE, Burke PJ. Does the self conform to the views of others? Soc Psychol Q. 1999;62(1):68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay-Warner J, Robinson DT. Infrared thermography as a measure of emotion response. Emot Rev. 2015;7(2):157–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914554783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley CH. Human nature and social order. New York: Scribner; 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley CH. Social organization. New York: Scribner; 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley CH. Life and the student. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1927. p. 200–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch CJ. Symbolic interaction and generic sociological principles. Symb Interact. 1984;7(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1984.7.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couch C. Researching social processes in the laboratory. Greenwich: JAI Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch CJ, Saxton SL, Katovich MA. The Iowa School. In: Couch CJ, Saxton SL, Katovich MA, editors. Studies in symbolic interaction, supplement 2. Greenwich: JAI Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross JE. Processes of place attachment: an interactional framework. Symb Interact. 2015;38(4): 493–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry TJ. A little pain never hurt anyone: athletic career socialization and the normalization of sports injury. Symb Interact. 1993;16:273–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley JM, Batson CD. From Jerusalem to Jericho: a study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behaviors. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976;27:100–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day PR. An interview: constructing reality. Bri J Soc Work. 1985;15(5):487–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis A, Martin PJ. Symbolic interactionism and the concept of power. Br J Sociol. 2005;56(2): 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00055.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK. On semiotics and symbolic interaction. Symb Interact. 1987;10(1):1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekema DA, Couch CJ, Powell JO. The third party standpoint, postmodernism, and the study of social transactions. Sociol Perspect. 1996;39(1):111–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E. The rules of sociological method. New York: The Free Press; 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen RF. Ethnographic research. New York: Academic; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis C, Bochner AP. Autoethnography, personal narrative, and reflexivity: researcher as subject. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 733–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2007;62:107–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine GA. Kitchens: the culture of restaurant work. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine GA. Morel Tales: the culture of mushrooming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine GA. Giften tongues: high school debate and adolescent culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine GA. Players and pawns: how chess builds community and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin BJ, Kohout FJ. Subject-coded versus researcher-coded TST protocols: some methodological implications. Sociol Q. 1971;12:82–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans H. The urban villagers. New York: Free Press; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Awareness contexts and social interaction. Am Sociol Rev. 1964;29:669–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein JH, Arms RL. Effects of observing athletic contests on hostility. Sociometry. 1971;34:83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk S. The presentation of avatars in second life: self and interaction in social virtual spaces. Symb Interact. 2010;33(4):501–25. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2010.33.4.501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace SL, Kramer KL. Sense of self in the new millennium: male and female student responses to TST. Soc Behav Personal. 2002;30(3):271–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney C, Banks WC, Zimbardo PG. Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. Int J Criminol Penology. 1973;1:69–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey DC. ‘Gimme a Pigfoot and a Bottle of Beer’: food as cultural performance in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina. Symb Interact. 2017;40:498–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heise DR. Understanding social interaction with affect control theory. In: Berger J, Zelditch Jr M, editors. New directions in contemporary sociological theory. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2002. p. 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise DR, Calhan C. Emotion norms in interpersonal events. Soc Psychol Q. 1995;58(4):223–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hektner JM, Schmidt JA, Csikszentmihalyi M. Experience sampling method: measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herman-Kinney NJ, Vershaeve JM. Methods of symbolic interactionism. In: Reynolds LT, Herman-Kinney NJ, editors. Handbook of symbolic interactionism. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 2003. p. 213–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild AR. The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2003 [1983].

    Google Scholar 

  • House JS. The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry. 1977;40:161–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J. A phenomenological study of suicide notes. Soc Probl. 1967;15:60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katovich MA. Identity, time, and situated activity: an interactions analysis of dyadic transactions. Symb Interact. 1987;10(2):187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katovich MA. Couch the Bricoleur: using ethnographic and laboratory traditions to establish data careers. Symb Interact. 1995;18(3):283–301. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1995.18.3.283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katovich MA, Miller DE, Stewart RL. The Iowa School. In: Reynolds LT, Herman-Kinney NJ, editors. Handbook of symbolic interactionism. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 2003. p. 119–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JR, McCarty MK, Iannone NE. Interaction in small groups. In: DeLamater JD, Ward A, editors. Handbook of social psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 413–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn MH. Major trends in symbolic interaction theory in the past twenty-five years. Sociol Q. 1964;5:61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn MH, McPartland TS. An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. Am Sociol Rev. 1954;19:68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa R, Reitzes DC. Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In: Boss P, Doherty WJ, LaRossa R, Schumm WR, Steinmetz SK, editors. Sourcebook of family theories and methods. Boston: Springer; 2009. p. 135–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebow E. Tally’s corner. Boston: Little Brown and Co.; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon NJ. Symbolic interactionism as affect control. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe J, Tanner AE, Heiman JR. The impact of gender expectations on meanings of sex and sexuality: results from a cognitive interview study. Sex Roles. 2010;62(3–4):252–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall GJ. Interactionist perspectives in social psychology. In: DeLamater JD, Ward A, editors. Handbook of social psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 3–29.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCall GJ, Simmons JL. Identities and interactions: an examination of human associations in everyday life. Revised ed. New York: The Free Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail C. Experimental research is convergent with symbolic interaction. Symb Interact. 1979;2(1):89–94. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1979.2.1.89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Brashears ME. Social isolation in America: changes in core discussion networks over two decades. Am Sociol Rev. 2006;71(3):353–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead GH. Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch HL, Boden D. Talking social structure: discourse, domination and the Watergate hearings. Am Sociol Rev. 1985;50(3):273–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musolf GR. The Chicago school. In: Reynolds LT, Herman-Kinney NJ, editors. Handbook of symbolic interactionism. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 2003. p. 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musolf GR. The symbolic interactionism of Bernard N. Meltzer. Mich Sociol Rev. 2008;22:112–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugus P. The interactionist self and grounded research: reflexivity in a study of emergency department clinicians. Qual Sociol Rev. 2008;4(1):189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T. The social system. Abingdon: Routledge; 2005 [1951].

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechmann C, Pirouz D, Pezzuti T. Symbolic interactionism and adolescent reactions to cigarette advertisements. In: Campbell MC, Inman J, Pieters R, editors. Advances in consumer research, vol. 37. Doluth: Association for Consumer Research; 2010. p. 138–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennartz PJJ. Semiotic theory and environmental evaluation: a proposal for a new approach and a new method. Symb Interact. 1989;12(2):231–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quin CO, Robinson IE, Balkwell JW. A synthesis of two social psychologies. Symb Interact. 1980;3(1):59–88. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1980.3.1.59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafalow MH, Adams BL. Navigating the tavern: digitally mediated connections and relationship persistence in bar settings. Symb Interact. 2016;40(1):25–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid JA, Webber GR, Elliott S. ‘It’s like being in church and being on a field trip:’ the date versus party situation in college students’ accounts of hooking up. Symb Interact. 2015;38(2):175–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/SYMB.153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds LT, Meltzer BN. The origins of divergent methodological stances in symbolic interactionism. Sociol Q. 1973;14(2):189–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1973.tb00853.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DT, Smith-Lovin L. Affect control theory. In: Burke PJ, editor. Contemporary social psychological theories. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2006. p. 137–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvini A. Symbolic interactionism and social network analysis: an uncertain encounter. Symb Interact. 2010;33(3):364–88. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2010.33.3.364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom KL, Fine GA. Triumphs, emerging voices, and the future. In: Reynolds LT, Herman-Kinney NJ, editors. Handbook of symbolic interactionism. Lanham: AltaMira Press; 2003. p. 1041–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawicka M. Searching for a narrative of loss: interactional ordering of ambiguous grief. Symb Interact. 2016;40(2):229–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnittker J. Social structure and personality. In: DeLamater JD, Ward A, editors. Handbook of social psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott G, Garner R. Doing qualitative research: designs, methods, and techniques. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpe RT, Stryker S. The symbolic interactionist perspective and identity theory. In: Schwartz SJ, Luyckx K, Vignoles VL, editors. Handbook of identity theory and research. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 225–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Serry T, Liamputtong P. The in-depth interviewing method in health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva EO. Neutralizing problematic frames in the culture wars: anti-evolutionists grapple with religion. Symb Interact. 2014;37(2):226–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg G, Gill EA, Tan JE. Social organization. In: Reynolds LT, Herman-Kinney NJ, editors. Handbook of symbolic interactionism. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 2003. p. 411–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnova M. ‘I am a cheerleader, but secretly I deal drugs’: authenticity through concealment and disclosure. Symb Interact. 2016;39(1):26–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin L. Social psychology. In: Blau JR, editor. The Blackwell companion to sociology. Malden: Blackwell; 2001. p. 407–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin L, Douglass W. An affect control analysis of two religious subcultures. In: Gecas V, Franks D, editors. Social perspective in emotions. Greenwich: JAI Press; 1992. p. 217–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets JE, Carter MJ. The moral identity: a principle level identity. In: McClelland K, Fararo TJ, editors. Purpose, meaning, and action: control systems theories in sociology. New York: Palgrave MacMillan; 2006. p. 293–316.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stets JE, Carter MJ. The moral self: applying identity theory. Soc Psychol Q. 2011;74:192–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets JE, Carter MJ. A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. Am Sociol Rev. 2012;77:120–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets JE, Serpe RT. Identity theory. In: DeLamater JD, Ward A, editors. Handbook of social psychology. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 31–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart K. The presentation of everyday life: some textual strategies for adequate ethnography. Urban Life. 1986;15(1):103–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker S. Symbolic interactionism: a social structural version. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker S. Traditional symbolic interactionism, role theory, and structural symbolic interactionism: the road to identity theory. In: Turner JH, editor. Handbook of sociological theory. New York: Kluwer/Plenum Publishers; 2001. p. 211–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker S, Burke PJ. The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Soc Psychol Q. 2000;63:284–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker S, Vryan KD. The symbolic interactionist frame. In: DeLamater JD, editor. Handbook of social psychology. New York: Kluwer-Plenum; 2003. p. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedlock B. The observation of participation and the emergence of public ethnography. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005. p. 467–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas WI. The unadjusted girl. Montclair: Patterson Smith Publishing Corporation; 1969 [1923].

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas WI, Thomas DS. The child in America: behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf; 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas WI, Znaniecki F. The polish peasant in Europe and America. Chicago: University of Illinois Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne B. Gender play: girls and boys in school. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RH. The role and the person. Am J Sociol. 1978;84(1):1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren CAB, Karner TX. Discovering qualitative methods: field research, interviews, and analysis. Los Angeles: Roxbury; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigert AJ. Identity: its emergence within sociological psychology. Symb Interact. 1983;6:183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins B, Heise DR. Expectations, intentions, and behavior: some tests of affect control theory. Math Sociol. 1987;13:153–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sociology Department, California State University, Northridge, Northridge, CA, USA

    Michael J. Carter & Andrea Montes Alvarado

Authors
  1. Michael J. Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Montes Alvarado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Carter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Carter, M.J., Montes Alvarado, A. (2019). Symbolic Interactionism as a Methodological Framework. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_62

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation