Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Human Rights Institutions, Tribunals, and Courts pp 169–197Cite as

Gender in the UN: CEDAW and the Commission on the Status of Women

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Human Rights ((IHR))

Abstract

This chapter introduces the development and competence of the Commission on the Status of Women, the main UN intergovernmental body, responsible for the advancement of women. Among its major achievements is the elaboration of the draft Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and its Optional Protocol. The Convention is overseen by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, whose competence and work are also described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agenda for Sustainable Development (2015), UN Doc. A/RES/70/1

    Google Scholar 

  • Banda F (2013a) The UN Working Group on discrimination against women. In: Hellum A, Sindig Aasen H (eds) Women’s human rights: CEDAW in international, regional and national law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 62–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Banda F (2013b) Article 14: rural women. In: Freeman M, Chinkin C, Rudolf B (eds) The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 358–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Begtrup B (1946) Statement of the chair of the Subcommission on the Status of Women. Bodil Begtrup to ECOSOC, UN Doc E/PV4 (28 May 1946)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boerefijn I (2013a) Article 17. In: Freeman M, Chinkin C, Rudolf B (eds) The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 475–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Boerefijn I (2013b) Article 21. In: Freeman M, Chinkin C, Rudolf B (eds) The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 522–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding E (1975) Female alternatives to hierarchical systems, past and present: a critique of women’s NGO’s in the light of history. International Associations 6-7:340–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler-Dines K (2017) Saudi Arabia’s election to the UN Commission on the Status of Women: UN blunder or new opportunity? Georgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security (GIWPS) Available at: http://giwps.georgetown.edu/saudi-arabias-election-to-the-un-commission-on-the-status-of-women-un-blunder-or-new-opportunity-2. Accessed 13 February 2018

  • Byrnes A (2013) The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. In: Hellum A, Sinding Aasen H (eds) Women’s human rights: CEDAW in international, regional and national law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 27–61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2004) Follow-up report on Argentina, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/ARG/5/Add.1, 29 January 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2005) Communication 2/2003 AT v Hungary, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/36/D/2/2003

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2006) Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women on its 34th, 35th and 36th sessions, UN Doc. A/61/38

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2007a) Communication No. 5/2005 Şahide Goekce v Austria, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2007b) Communication No. 6/2005 Yildirim v Austria, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2007c) Communication No. 7/2005 Munoz-Varas y Sainz de Vicuna v Spain, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/39/7/2005

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2009a) Communication No. 12/2007 Group d’Intérêt pour le Matronyme v France, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2009b) Communication No. 13/2007 SOS Sexisme v France, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/44/D/13/2007

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2010) Communication No. 18/2008 Vertido v the Philippines, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2011a) Communication No. 17/2008 Alyne da Silva Pimentel Teixera v Brazil, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/49/D/17/2008

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2011b), Communication No. 22/2009 LC v Peru, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2012a) Communication No. 19/2008 Kell v Canada, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/51/D/19/2008

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2012b) Communication No. 23/2010 RKB v Turkey, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/51/D/28/2010

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2012c) Communication No. 31/2011 SPP v Bulgaria, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/53/D/31/2011

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2012d) Communication No. 32/2011 Isatou Jallow v Bulgaria, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/52/D/32/2011

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2012e) Communication No. No. 20/2008 VK v Bulgaria, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/49/D/20/2008

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2013) Communication No. 44/2012 M.KD-AA v Denmark, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/56/D/44/2012

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2014a) Communication No. 34/2011 RPB v the Philippines, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2014b) Communication No. 7/2012 González Carreňo v Spain, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/48/D/47/2012

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2014c) Concluding observations on the combined 7th and 8th periodic reports of China, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/CHIN/CO/7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2015a) Communication No. 29/2009 X and Y v Georgia, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/61/D/29/2009

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2015b) Summary of the Philippines inquiry, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/OP.8/PHL/1/2015

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2017a) General recommendation No. 35 on gender-based violence against women, updating general recommendation No. 19, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GC/35, 26 July 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2017b) Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women on its 67th session, Informal Document, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/2017/II/CRP

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDAW Committee (2018a) Statement by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women on its relationship with non-governmental organizations, http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CEDAW/Statements/NGO.pdf. Accessed 13 January 2018

  • CEDAW Committee (2018b) Statement of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women on its relationship with national human rights institutions 2008, http://www.ohvhr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CEDAW/StatementOnNHRIs.pdf. Accessed 13 January 2018

  • CEDAW Committee and CRC Committee (2014) Joint general recommendation No. 31 of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women/General comment No. 18 of the Committee on the Rights of the Child on harmful practices, UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GR/31-CRC/C/GC/18, 4 November 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth H, Chinkin C (2013) The new United Nations “gender architecture”: the creation of UN women, RegNet research paper series, 2013/7, regulatory institutions network (RegNet). Australian National University, Centre for International Governance and Justice, pp 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinkin C Freeman M (2012) introduction. In: Freeman M, Chinkin C. Rudolf B (eds) the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinkin C, Freeman M (2012) Violence against women. In: Freeman M, Chinkin C, Rudolf B (eds) The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 443–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Human Rights (1988) resolution 188/33 (April 1988) UN Doc E/CN4/Res/1998/33:17

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Status of Women (1947) Report of the Commission on the Status of Women on its first session (1947) UN Doc (February 1947) E/281/Rev 1:25

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Status of Women (1972) resolution 10 (XXIV) (February 1972) UN Doc E/CN 6(/568):29

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Status of Women (1974) Report of the twenty-fifth session, UN doc. In: E/5451

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Status of Women (1978) Resolution XXVII adopted at its twenty-seventh session, UN doc. E/1978/322/rev.1-E/CN.6/620/rev.1, ECOSOC official records 1978. Supplement No:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Status of Women (1982) draft resolution UN Doc. IV E/1982/14-E/CN.6/1982/14

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Status of Women (2016) Report of the Commission on the Status of Women on its sixtieth session for the types of trends identified, UN doc. In: E/CN.6/2016/22

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Status of Women (2017) Report of the Commission on the Status of Women on its sixty-first session, UN doc. In: E/2017/27-E/CN.6/2017/21

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Status of Women. resolution 7(XXI), UN Doc. E/4472

    Google Scholar 

  • Connors J (1996) NGOs and the human rights of women at the UN. In: Willets P (ed) The conscience of the world: the influence of non-governmental organisations in the UN system. Hurst, London, pp 147–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Connors J (2012) Optional Protocol. In: Freeman M, Chinkin C, Rudolf B (eds) The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 607–679

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC (2016) List of non-governmental organizations in consultative status with the Economic and Social Council as of 1 September 2016, UN Doc. E/2016/INF/5, 29 December 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC. decision 2002/234, 24 July 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC. decision 2002/235, 24 July 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC. decision 86/5683, UN Doc. E/5683 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC. draft resolution IV presented to the ECOSOC by the twenty-ninth session of the CSW, UN Doc. E/1982/14-E/CN.6/1982/14

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 1235, UN Doc. E/4935 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 1326 (XLIV), 31 May 1968, UN Doc. A/7203

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 1503, UN Doc. E/4832, Add.1 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 1987/21, UN Doc. E/RES/1987/21, 26 May 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 1987/24, UN Doc. E/RES/1987/24, 26 May 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 1992/19, UN Doc. E/RES/1992/19, 30 July 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 1993/11, UN Doc. E/RES/1993/11, 27 July 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 1999/257, UN Doc. E/RES/1999/257, 28 July 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 2009/16, UN Doc. E/RES/2009/16, 28 July 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 2015/6, UN Doc. E/RES/2015/6, 31 July 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 2016/3, Multi-year programme of work of the Commission on the Status of Women, UN Doc. E/RES/2016/3, 22 July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 304 I (XI), UN Doc. E/1849, 14 and 17 July 1950

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution. 76 (V) 1947, UN Doc. E/573, 5 August 1947

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution E/RES/196 (VIII) (1949) calling for cooperation between the International Labour Organization and the Commission on the Status of Women, UN Doc. E/RES/196 (VIII), 18 February 1949

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC resolution E/RES/2/11 (1946) establishing the Commission on the Status of Women, UN Doc. E/RES/2/11, 21 June 1946

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Human Rights., Opuz v Turkey, 33401/02, 9 June 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, L (2014) Having Iran as its standard-bearer for women’s rights discredits UN. The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/having-iran-as-its-standard-bearer-for-womens-rights-discredits-un-26437. Accessed 13 February 2018

  • Human Rights Council resolution 15/23 (2010) UN doc. HRC/RES/15/23, 23 October 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 (2007) on the institution building of the Human Rights Council, UN Doc. A/RES/HRC/5/1, 18 June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JP (1983) The memoires of John P. Humphrey: the first director of the United Nations division for human rights. Human Rights Quarterly 5:387–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2009) Gonzàlez et al (‘Cotton Field’) v Mexico, Series c, No 205, 16 November 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • International Women’s Health Coalition (n.d.) Statement on the political declaration on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the Fourth World Conference on Women, https://iwhc.org/resources/womens-statement-20th-anniversary-fourth-world-conference-women. Accessed 15 February 2018

  • Jain D (2005) Women, development and the United Nations: a sixty-year quest for equality and justice. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • OHCHR (2008) CEDAW now in Geneva. Available at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/Cedaw.aspx. Accessed 15 February 2018

  • OHCHR/CEDAW (2014) General recommendations, Available at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CEDAW/Pages/Recommendations.aspx. Accessed 15 February 2018

  • OHCHR/CEDAW (2015) Simplified reporting procedure, Available at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CEDAW/Pages/ReportingProcedures.aspx. Accessed 15 February 2018

  • OHCHR/CEDAW (2017) Chairperson’s and other statements. Available at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CEDAW/Pages/Statements.aspx. Accessed 15 February 2018

  • OHCHR/CESCR (2013) Inquiry procedure, Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CESCR/Pages/InquiryProcedure.aspx. Accessed 15 February 2018

  • Peitilä, H (2007) The unfinished story of women and the United Nations, NGLS Development Dossier, Geneva, UNCTAD/NGLS/2007/1, p 38–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri, L (2017) Report on CSW61 and analysis of the agreed conclusions, UN Women. Available at http://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2017/5/report-of-csw61-and-analysis-of-the-agreed-conclusions. Accessed 15 February 2018

  • Reanda L (1992) The Commission on the Status of Women. In: Alston P (ed) The United Nations and human rights: a critical appraisal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 265–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Skard T (2008) Getting our history right: how were the equal rights of women and men included in the charter of the United Nations? Forum for Development (1):37–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Statute of the Inter-American Commission of Women (2016). Available at http://www.oas.org/en/cim/docs/CIMStatute-2016-EN.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2018

  • Supreme Court of India., Vishaka v The State of Rajasthan (AIR 1977 Supreme Court 3011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaine A, O’Rourke C (2015) Guidebook on CEDAW general recommendation no 30 and the UN security Council’s resolutions on women, peace and security. Women, UN

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly resolution 3010 (XXVII) (1972) UN Doc A/RES/3010 (XXVII), 18 December:1972

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly resolution 35/136 (1980) UN Doc. A/RES/35/136, 11 December 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly resolution 48/134 (1993) Principles relating to the status of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights (Paris Principles), UN Doc. A/RES/48/134, annex, 20 December 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly resolution 50/203 (1995) UN Doc. A/RES/50/203, 22 December 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly resolution 55/71 (2001) UN Doc. A/RES/55/71, 8 February 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly resolution 60/251 (2006) UN Doc. A/RES/60/251, 3 April 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Watch (2017) No Joke: UN elects Saudi Arabia to Women’s Rights Commission for 2018–2022 Term. Available at https://www.unwatch.org/no-joke-u-n-elects-saudi-arabia-womens-rights-commission. Accessed 13 January 2018

  • UN Women (2017) Communications Procedure, Available at: http://www.unwomen.org/en/csw/communications-procedure. Accessed 13 February 2018

  • United Nations (1948), UN Doc. E/RES/120 (VI), 3 March 1948

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1950) Report of the Secretary-General to the CSW on the UNESCO study of educational opportunities for women, UN Doc. E/CN.6/146, 9 May 1950

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1980) Programme of Action for the Second Half of the UN Decade for Women, UN Doc. A/CONF.94/35 (80.IV.3)

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1983) Report of the special rapporteur on the exploitation and prostitution of others to the ECOSOC, UN Doc. E/1983/7, 17 March 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1991) Report of the Secretary-General: Monitoring the Implementation of the Nairobi Forward-looking Strategies for the Advancement of Women: examining existing communications mechanisms of the advancement of women, UN Doc. E/CN.6/1991/10

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1996) United Nations and advancement of women, UN publications series, vol VI. United Nations Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1997) Report of the Economic and Social Council, UN Doc. A/52/3, 18 September 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2001) Report of the Secretary-General assessing the implications of the reforms of the mechanisms in the human rights area (1503 procedure) for communications concerning the status of women, UN Doc. E/CN.6/2001/12, 16 January 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2002) Report of the Secretary-General assessing the implications of the reforms of mechanisms in the human rights area (1503 procedure) for communications concerning the status of women, UN Doc. E/CN.6/2002/12, 18 January 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2004) Report of the Secretary-General on future work of the Working Group on Communications on the Status of Women, UN Doc. E/CN.6/2004/11, 22 December 2003, Add I, 16 January 2004, and Add II, 11 February 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2009a) Report of the Secretary General, UN Doc. HRI/GEN/2/Rev.6, 3 June 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2009b) Report of the Secretary-General on future work of the Working Group on Communications on the Status of Women, UN Doc. E/CN.6/2009/8, 1 December 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2012) Report of the Chairs of human rights treaty bodies on their 24th meeting, Annex I, UN Doc. A/67/222

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2013) Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women on its 52nd session, UN Doc. A/68/38

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015a) Guidelines on Intimidation or Reprisals (San José Guidelines), UN Doc. HRI/MC/2015/6, 30 July 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015b) Report of the Chairs of the human rights treaty bodies on their 27th meeting, UN Doc. A/70/302

    Google Scholar 

  • Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (1993), UN Doc. A/CONF.157/23

    Google Scholar 

  • World Plan of Action for the Implementation of the Objectives of the International Women’s Year (1975), UN Doc. E/CONF.66/34 (76.IV.1)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Advocacy, Amnesty International, Geneva, Switzerland

    Jane Connors

Authors
  1. Jane Connors
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Connors .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Law, University of Graz, Graz, Austria

    Gerd Oberleitner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Connors, J. (2018). Gender in the UN: CEDAW and the Commission on the Status of Women. In: Oberleitner, G. (eds) International Human Rights Institutions, Tribunals, and Courts. International Human Rights. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5206-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation