Traditional Survey and Questionnaire Platforms

Living reference work entry

Abstract

Platforms for administering surveys have evolved in the past 20 years, and increasingly electronic platforms are utilized by many research programs. Historically, paper-and-pencil interviewing was the norm, and in recent years computer-assisted interviewing has been adopted by many. This chapter considers the questionnaire as a mode of data collection, the use of survey methods that employed paper and pencil, their merits, and limitations. It also compares traditional and online surveys, reasons for their wider adoption, and potential into the future. The discussion also considers ethics liabilities and strengths of data management in which either data collection platforms are used. Researchers should choose the most appropriate method depending on the topic, goals of the study, geographic region, timeframe, and budget. The issues highlighted above may need exploring through methodological research.

Keywords

Traditional surveys Questionnaires Online surveys Representativeness Social desirability Interviewers 

References

  1. Aransiola JO, Akinyemi AI, Akinlo A, Togonu-Bickesteeth F. Grandparenting in selected West African countries: implications for health and hygiene behaviours in the household. GrandFamilies: Contemp J Res Pract Pol. 2017;4(1):195. http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/grandfamilies/vol4/iss1/11.Google Scholar
  2. Blasius J, Brandt M. Representativeness in online surveys through stratified samples. Bull Méthodologie Sociol. 2010;107:5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Publ Health (Oxf). 2005;27(3):281–91.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdi031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowling A, Windsor J. The effects of question order and response-choice on self-rated health status in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62(1):81–5.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.058214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandt R. Website vs. traditional survey ratings. Do they tell the same story? Mark Res. 2012. http://www.thevoicecrafter.com/files/107673625.pdf.
  6. Brigham J, Lessov-Schlaggar NC, Javitz SH, Krasnow ER, McElroy M, Swan EG. Test-retest reliability of web-based retrospective self-report of tobacco exposure and risk. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(3):e35.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callegaro M, Manfreda KL, Vehovar V. Mario callegaro discusses web survey methodology. Slovenia, University of Ljubljana: SAGE Research Methods; 2017.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper MP. The future of modes of data collection. Publ Opin Q. 2011;75(5):889–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devine P, Lloyd K. Internet use and psychological well-being among 10-year-old and 11-year-old children. Child Care Pract. 2012;18(1):5–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2011.621888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egan J. Why online surveys top traditional surveys. 2016. https://icitizen.com/blog/why-online-surveys-top-traditional-surveys/.
  11. Fricker S, Galesic M, Tourangeau R, Yan T. An experimental comparison of web and telephone surveys. Publ Opin Q. 2005;69(3):370–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Bock BC, Cobb NK, Baskin-Sommers A, Niaura R, Abrams DB. Internet- vs. telephone-administered questionnaires in a randomized trial of smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res: Off J Soc Res Nicotine Tob. 2006;8(Suppl 1):S49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenlaw C, Brown-Welty S. A comparison of web-based and paper-based survey methods: testing assumptions of survey mode and response cost. Eval Rev. 2009;33(5):464–80.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x09340214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hohwü L, Lyshol H, Gissler M, Jonsson SH, Petzold M, Obel C. Web-based versus traditional paper questionnaires: a mixed-mode survey with a nordic perspective. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e173.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoogendorn AW, Daalmans J. Nonresponse in the requirement of an Internet panel based on probability sampling. Surv Res Methods. 2009;3:59–72.Google Scholar
  16. Kellner P. Can online polls produce accurate findings. Int J Mark Res. 2004;46(1):3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kongsved MS, Basnov M, Holm-Christensen K, Hjollund HN. Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(3):e25.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kramer ADI, Guillory JE, Hancock JT. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(24):8788–90.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liljeberg H, Krambeer S. Bevölkerungs-repräsentative Onlinebefragungen. Die Entdeckung des Scharzen Schimmel? Planung und Analyse, Sonderdruck: online, social, mobile: what’s next? 2012.Google Scholar
  20. Marleen MHJ, van Gelder MM, Reini W, Roeleveld N. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(11):1292–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N,…, Bond J. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(31):1–256.Google Scholar
  22. McKoy Davis JG, Willie-Tyndale D, Mitchell-Fearon K, Holder-Nevins D, James K, Eldemire-Shearer D. Caregiving among community-dwelling grandparents in Jamaica. GrandFamilies: Contemp J Res Pract Policy. 2017;4(1):7–40 Google Scholar
  23. Mhaka-Mutepfa M, Cumming R, Mpofu E. Grandparents fostering orphans: influences of protective factors on their health and well-being. Health Care Women Int. 2014;35(7–9):1022–39.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2014.916294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morales-Vives F, Vigil-Colet A, Lorenzo-Seva U, Ruiz-Pamies M. How social desirability and acquiescence affects the age–personality relationship. Personal Individ Differ. 2014;60(Supplement):S16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newman JC, Des Jarlais DC, Turner CF, Gribble J, Cooley P, Paone D. The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:294–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nosek B, Hawkins C, Frazier R. Implicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(4):152–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pew Research Centre.The demographics of social media users. 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/2008/2019/the-demographics-of-social-media-users/.
  28. Ponto J. Understanding and evaluating survey research. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2015;6(2):168–71.Google Scholar
  29. Poushter J. Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Pew research center. 2017. Pewglobal.org. http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/2002/2022/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-economies/.
  30. Rankin KM, Rauscher GH, McCarthy B, Erdal S, Lada P, Il’yasova D, Davis F. Comparing the reliability of responses to telephone-administered vs. self-administered web-based surveys in a case-control study of adult malignant brain cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17(10):2639–46.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schoen KL, Crilly N. Implicit methods for testing product preference exploratory studies with the affective simon task. 2012. http://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/~nc266/WebFiles/Schoen_&_Crilly_(2012)_Implicit_methods_(Design_&_Emotion).pdf.
  32. Spek V, Nyklícek I, Cuijpers P. Internet administration of the Edinburgh Depression Scale. J Affect Disord. 2008;106(3):301–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Szolnoki G, Hoffmann D. Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys – comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research. Wine Econ Policy. 2013;2(2):57–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2013.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor PA, Nelson NM, Grandjean BD, Anatchkova B, Aadland D. Mode effects and other potential biases in panel-based internet surveys final report. 2009. Retrieved from Wyoming Survey & Analysis Centre.Google Scholar
  35. Tourangeau R, Yan T. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(5):859–83.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Touvier M, Méjean C, Kesse-Guyot E. Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(5):287–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. UN News Centre. Billions of people in developing world still without Internet access, new UN report finds. 2015. www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=51924.
  38. van den Berg MH, Overbeek A, van der Pal HJ, Versluys AB, Bresters D, van Leeuwen FE, … van Dulmen-den Broeder E. Using web-based and paper-based questionnaires for collecting data on fertility issues among female childhood cancer survivors: differences in response characteristics. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e76.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1707.
  39. van Gelder MMHJ, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(11):1292–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Varkevisser CM, Pathmanathan I, Brownlee A. Designing and conducting health systems research projects. Proposal Dev Fieldwork. 2003;1:1–357Google Scholar
  41. Walker T. State of the internet 1st quarter 2012. 2012. comScore.Google Scholar
  42. Wyatt JC. When to use web-based surveys. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7(5):426–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang X, Kuchinke L, Woud ML, Velten J, Margraf J. Survey method matters: online/offline questionnaires and face-to-face or telephone interviews differ. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;71:172–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zuidgeest M, Hendriks M, Koopman L, Spreeuwenberg P, Rademakers J. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients’ experiences with breast care. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e68.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of BotswanaGaboroneBotswana
  2. 2.Department of Environmental HealthUniversity of BotswanaGaboroneBotswana

Personalised recommendations