Abstract
This chapter begins by establishing an historical trajectory of face-to-face research with prisoners. It goes on to identify fundamental features of prisons and prisoners’ lives that make them sensitive settings and populations for researchers to study, and it then presents ethical considerations that researchers must be mindful of when carrying out this kind of research. Ethical concerns both within and beyond the scope of formal Institutional Review Boards are outlined and explored, as are researcher strategies for managing boundaries and emotions when doing prison research. To the extent that ethics, emotions, researcher presentation of self, and similar themes have been written about within the context of prison research, they have primarily been framed as considerations for qualitative field researchers. By way of contrast, an underlying assumption of this chapter is that those who do other forms of face-to-face research with prisoners, including quantitative self-report surveys, mixed-method approaches, and focus groups, should similarly engage with these themes. This chapter ultimately endorses being reflectively engaged with the setting, the research process, and oneself when doing face-to-face research in prisons, regardless of the substantive goals of one’s study or the particular research methods one employs. Accordingly, the issues raised in this chapter will be relevant to a range of health and social science researchers who enter prisons to study prisoners.
References
Beyens K, Kennes P, Snacken S, Tournel H. The craft of doing qualitative research in prisons. Int J Crime, Justice Social Democr. 2015;4(1):66–78.
Bick JA. Infection control in jails and prisons. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(8):1047–55.
Bosworth M, Kellezi B. Doing research in immigration removal centres: ethics, emotions and impact. Criminol Crim Justice. 2016:1–17. doi:10.1177/1748895816646151.
Brewer-Smyth K. Ethical, regulatory, and investigator considerations in prison research. Adv Nurs Sci. 2008;31(2):119–27.
Cislo AM, Trestman R. Challenges and solutions for conducting research in correctional settings: the U.S. experience. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013;36:304–10.
Clemmer D. The prison community. Boston: Christopher; 1940.
Comfort M. Doing time together: love and family in the shadow of the prison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2008.
Coninx R, Maher D, Reyes H, Grzemska M. Tuberculosis in prisons in countries with high prevalence. Br Med J. 2000;320(7232):440–2.
Cunha M. The ethnography of prisons and penal confinement. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2014;43:217–33.
Downing S, Polzer K, Levan K. Space, time, and reflexive interviewing: implications for qualitative research with active, incarcerated, and former criminal offenders. Int J Qual Methods. 2013;12:478–97.
Drake DH, Earle R, Sloan J. General introduction: what ethnography tells us about prisons and what prisons tell us about ethnography. In: Drake DH, Earle R, Sloan J, editors. The Palgrave handbook of prison ethnography. New York: Palgrave MacMillan; 2015. p. 1–16.
Easterling BA, Johnson EI. Conducting qualitative research on parental incarceration: personal reflections on challenges and contributions. Qual Rep. 2015;20(10):1550–67.
Fazel S, Seewald K. Severe mental illness in 33,588 prisoners worldwide: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200(5):364–73.
Fazel S, Bains P, Doll H. Substance abuse and dependence in prisoners: a systematic review. Addiction. 2006;101:181–91.
Fishman JF. Sex in prison: revealing sex conditions in American prisons. New York: National Library Press; 1934.
Goffman E. Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City: Anchor Books; 1961.
Hart CB. A primer in prison research. J Contemp Crim Just. 1995;11:165–75.
Harvey J. An embedded multimethod approach to prison research. In: King RD, Wincup E, editors. Doing research on crime and justice. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 487–99.
Hoge CW, Reichler MR, Dominguez EA, Bremer JC, Mastro TD, Hendricks KA, Breiman RF. An epidemic of pneumococcal disease in an overcrowded, inadequately ventilated jail. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(10):643–8.
Howard J. The state of prisons in England and Wales. Warrington: William Eyres; 1780.
Hser Y, Longshore D, Anglin MD. The life course perspective on drug use: a conceptual framework for understanding drug use trajectories. Eval Rev. 2007;31(6):515–47.
Jacobs JB. Stateville: the penitentiary in mass society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1977.
Jenness V. From policy to prisoners to people: a “soft-mixed methods” approach to studying transgender prisoners. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2010;39(5):517–53.
Jewkes Y. Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources doing prison research differently. Qual Inq. 2012;18(1):63–75.
Johnson R. Hard time: understanding and reforming the prison. 3rd ed. Belmont: Wadsworth; 2002.
Johnson J. Researching in prison: first hand encounters of a first-time prison researcher. Te Awatea Rev. 2015;12(1):15–20.
Johnson ME, Kondo KK, Brems C, Eldridge GD. HIV/AIDS research in correctional settings: a difficult task made even harder? J Correct Health Care. 2015;21(2):101–11.
Kaeble D, Glaze L, Tsoutis A, Minton T. Correctional populations in the United States, 2014. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), US Department of Justice, & Office of Justice Programs; 2015.
King RD. Doing research in prisons. In: King R, Wincup E, editors. Doing research on crime and justice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 285–312.
King RD, Liebling A. Doing research in prisons. In: King R, Wincup E, editors. Doing research on crime and justice. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 431–51.
Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: a guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage; 2007.
Liebling A. Whose side are we on?: theory, practice and allegiances in prisons research. Br J Criminol. 2001;41:472–84.
Liebling A. Postscript integrity and emotion in prisons research. Qual Inq. 2014;20(4):481–6.
Martin C. Doing research in a prison setting. In: Jupp V, Davies P, Francis P, editors. Doing criminological research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 215–33.
Naylor B. Researching human rights in prisons. Int J Crime Justice Soc Democr. 2015;4(1):79–95.
Newman DJ. Research interviewing in prison. J Crim Law Criminol Police Sci. 1958;49(2):127–32.
Nielsen MM. Pains and possibilities in prison: on the use of emotions and positioning in ethnographic research. Acta Sociol. 2010;53(4):307–21.
Petersilia J. When prisoners come home: parole and prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
Reiter K. Making windows in walls: strategies for prison research. Qual Inq. 2014;20(4):417–28.
Rhodes R. Why they kill: the discoveries of a maverick criminologist. New York: Vintage Books; 1999.
Ross JI, Richards SC. Introduction: what is the new school of convict criminology? In: Ross JI, Richards SC, editors. Convict criminology. Belmont: Wadsworth; 2003. p. 1–14.
Sloan J, Wright S. Going in green: reflections on the challenges of “getting in, getting on, and getting out” for doctoral prisons researchers. In: Drake DH, Earle R, Sloan J, editors. The Palgrave handbook of prison ethnography. New York: Palgrave MacMillan; 2015. p. 143–63.
Sutton J. An ethnographic account of doing survey research in prison: descriptions, reflections, and suggestions from the field. Qual Sociol Rev. 2011;7(2):45–63.
Sykes G. The society of captives. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1958.
US Department of Health and Human Services. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1979.
Wacquant L. The curious eclipse of prison ethnography in the age of mass incarceration. Ethnography. 2002;3(4):371–97.
Wakai S, Shelton D, Tretman RL, Kesten K. Conducting research in corrections: challenges and solutions. Behav Sci Law. 2009;27:743–52.
Waldram JB. Challenges of prison ethnography. Anthropol Newsl. 2009;50(1):4–5.
Walmsley R. World prison population list. 10th ed. London: King’s College London International Centre for Prison Studies; 2013.
Western B, Pettit B. Incarceration & social inequality. Daedalus. 2010;139(3):8–19.
Wolf LE, Zandecki J, Bernard L. The certificate of confidentiality application: a view from the NIH institutes. IRB Ethics Hum Res. 2004;36(1):14–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Sutton, J.E. (2017). Doing Reflectively Engaged, Face-To-Face Research in Prisons: Contexts and Sensitivities. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_137-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_137-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences