Abstract
Research with children is a vast and complex field, as it is influenced by the conceptions of childhood prevalent in each historical period, each particular culture, and each research team conception. In addition, research with children encompasses different points of view: social, political, cultural, and psychological. This chapter provides a review of the current state and the recent developments in each of these fields. Research with children presents researchers with the challenge of finding methods that are well-suited to children and that recognize the importance of children’s experience and agency. Such methods should promote a respectful approach based on ethics. We conceive children as the real protagonists, and thus believe they need to be addressed directly. In the same way, children’s self-expression, understanding, and empowerment should be promoted through the use of different techniques. For the purposes stated above, this chapter explores the possibility of using quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods and the emerging of new proposals such as the inclusion of technologies and arts-based methods that present significant future perspectives.
References
Aber LJ, Jones S. Indicators of positive development in early childhood: Improving concepts and measures. In: Hauser RM, Brown BV, Prosser WR, editors. Indicators of children’s wellbeing, pp. 395–408. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Ager A. Annual research review: resilience and child well-being–public policy implications. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54(4):488–500.
Appadurai A. La modernidad desbordada: dimensiones culturales de la globalización. Montevideo: Ediciones Trilce; 2001.
Aries P. Centuries of childhood: a social history of family life. New York: Vintage Books; 1962.
Backe-Hansen E. Between participation and protection. Involving children in child protection research. In: Fossheim H, editor. Cross-cultural child research ethical issues. Norway: The Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees; 2013. Retrieved from https://www.etikkom.no/globalassets/documents/publikasjoner-som-pdf/cross-cultural-child-research-webutgave.pdf. Accessed 27 Jun 2015.
Bagnoli A. Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qual Res. 2009;9(5):547–70.
Ben-Arieh A. Beyond welfare: measuring and monitoring the state of children – new trends and domains. Soc Indic Res. 2000;52(3):235–57.
Ben-Arieh A. Where are the children? Children’s role in measuring and monitoring their wellbeing. Social Indicators. 2005;74(3):573–596.
Ben-Arieh A. The child indicators movement: past, present, and future. Child Indic Res. 2008;1(1):3–16.
Ben-Arieh A, Kaufman NH, Andrews AB, George RM, Lee BJ, Aber LJ. Measuring and monitoring children’s well-being, vol. 7. Dordreth: Springer; 2013.
Berry JW. Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Appl Psychol. 1997;46(1):5–34.
Binda NU, Balbastre-Benavent F. Investigación cuantitativa e investigación cualitativa: buscando las ventajas de las diferentes metodologías de investigación. Rev Cienc Econ. 2013;31(2):179–87.
Boddy J. Ethics tensions in research with children across cultures, within countries. A UK Perspective. In: Fossheim H, editor. Cross-cultural child research ethical issues. Norway: The Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees; 2013. Retrieved from https://www.etikkom.no/globalassets/documents/publikasjoner-som-pdf/cross-cultural-child-research-webutgave.pdf. Accessed 27 Jun 2015.
Bornstein MH, Bradley RH, editors. Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development. Oxon: Routledge; 2014.
Boydell KM, Gladstone BM, Volpe T, Allemang B, Stasiulis E. The production and dissemination of knowledge: a scoping review of arts-based health research. Forum Qualitat Social Res. 2012;13(1):Art. 32. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1711/3328
Bradshaw J, Hoelscher P, Richardson D. An index of child well-being in the European Union. Soc Indic Res. 2007;80(1):133–77.
Bryman A. Social research methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
Chapple S, Richardson D. Doing better for children. OECD; 2009.
Christensen P, James A, editors. Research with children: perspectives and practices. London: Falmer Press; 2000.
Clark E. The proceedings of the thirtieth annual child language research forum. Stanford: Center for Study of Language and Information; 2000.
Cochran-Smith M, Lytle SL. Commentary – changing perspectives on practitioner research inquiry: perspectives, processes and possibilities. Learning Landscape. 2011; 4(2):7–30.
Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1996.
Collins CS, Cooper JE. Emotional intelligence and the qualitative researcher. Int J Qual Methods. 2014;13(1):88–103. http://ijq.sagepub.com/content/13/1/88.full.pdf+html. Accessed 25 Jun 2015
Cook TD, Reichardt CS. Métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos en investigación evaluativa. Madrid: Morata; 1986.
Denzin NK. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: Praeger; 1978.
ECLAC/UNICEF TACRO (The Americas and the Caribbean Regional Office). Pobreza infantil en América Latina y el Caribe, LC/R.2168. Santiago: ECLAC; 2010.
Edwards CP. Children’s play in cross-cultural perspective: a new look at the six cultures study. Faculty Publications, Department of Child, Youth, and Family Studies. Paper 1. 2005. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=famconfacpub. Accessed 9 Oct 2015.
Espíndola Advis E, Rico MN. Child poverty in Latin America: multiple deprivation and monetary measures combined. In: Minujin A, Nandy S, editors. Global child poverty and well-being: measurement, concepts, policy and action Bristol. UK: The Policy Press.pp; 2013. p. 379–418.
Fernandez S. Promoting the benefits of language learning. Report to the department of education and training. Melbourne: Research unit for multilingualism and cross cultural communication at the university of Melbourne. 2007. Retrieved from https://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/teachlearn/student/promobenefitslanglearning.pdf.
Fossheim H. Introduction. In: Fossheim H, editor. Cross-cultural child research: Ethical issues. Oslo: Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees; 2013. p. 9–16. https://www.etikkom.no/globalassets/documents/publikasjoner-som-pdf/cross-cultural-child-research-webutgave.pdf. Accessed 27 Jun 2015.
Fu G, Xu F, Cameron CA, Heyman G, Lee K. Cross-cultural differences in children’s choices, categorizations, and evaluations of truths and lies. Dev Psychol. 2007;43(2):278–93. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2581463/
Fuhs B. Die Generationenproblematik in der Kindheitsdforshcung /The Problem of Generations in the Research of Childhood. In Honig, 1999.
Gaitan Muñoz L. El espacio social de la infancia. Madrid: Comunidad de Madrid Conserjería de Sanidad y Servicios Sociales; 1999.
García M, Hecht AC. Los niños como interlocutores en la investigación antropológica. Consideraciones a partir de un taller de memoria con niños y niñas indígenas. Telluso. 2009;7:163–86.
Gilbert K, editor. The emotional nature of qualitative research. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2000.
Giménez G. Identidades en globalización. Espiral, Vll. 2000;19:27–48.
Giménez G. La concepción simbólica de la cultura. In: Giménez G, editor. Teoría y análisis de la cultura. México: CONACULTA e Instituto Coahuilense de Cultura; 2005. p. 67–88.
Glokner Fagetti V. Infancia y representación. Hacia una participación activa de los niños en las investigaciones en Ciencias Sociales. Revista Tramas, subjetividad y procesos sociales. N° 28. Diciembre. México DF: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; 2007. p. 67–83.
Hanson MJ. Families with Anglo-European roots. In: Lynch EW, Hanson MJ, editors. Developing crosscultural competence: a guide for working with young children and their families. Baltimore: Brookes; 1992. p. 65–87.
Hirschfeld L. Why don’t anthropologists like children? Am Anthropol. 2002;104(2):611–27.
Hymes D. Why linguistics needs the sociologist. Soc Res. 1967;34:632–47.
Jackson-Maldonado D, Thal D, Marchman V, Bates E, Gutierrez-Clellen V. Early lexical development in Spanish-speaking infants and toddlers. J Child Lang. 1993;20:523–49.
James A, Prout A, editors. Constructing and reconstructing childhood: contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London: Falmer Press; 1997.
Johnson R, Onwuegbuzie B, Turner L. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1:112–33.
Junker DA, Stockman IJ. Expressive vocabulary of German-English bilingual toddlers. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2002;11(4):381–94.
Kamerman S. Preface. In: Kamerman S, Phipps S, Ben-Arieh A, editors. From child welfare to child well-being. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010.
Kibria N. The changing lives of Vietnamese-Americans. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993.
Kjørholt AM. “Childhood studies” and the ethics of an encounter: reflections on research with children in different cultural contexts. In: Fossheim H, editor. Cross-cultural child research: ethical issues. Oslo: Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees; 2013. p. 17–44. https://www.etikkom.no/globalassets/documents/publikasjoner-som-pdf/cross-cultural-child-research-webutgave.pdf. Accessed 27 Jun 2015.
Kohan W. Infancia entre educación y filosofía. Barcelona: Ed. Laertes; 2003.
Kwan YK, Ip WC. Life satisfaction, perceived health, violent and altruistic behaviour of Hong Kong Chinese adolescents: only children versus children with siblings. Child Indic Res. 2009;2(4):375–89.
Lau AS, McCabe KM, Yeh M, Garland AF, Wood PA, Hough RL. The acculturation gap-distress hypothesis among high-risk Mexican American families. J Fam Psychol. 2005;19(3):367.
Li H, Martin AJ, Armstrong D, Walker R. Risk, protection, and resilience in Chinese adolescents: a psycho-social study. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2011;14(4):269–82.
Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods, 4th edn. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Liddicoat A. Learning a language, learning about language, learning to be literate. Babel. 2001;35(3):12–5.
Liebel M. Paternalismo, participación y protagonismo infantil. In: Corona Caraveo Y, Linares Pontón ME, editors. Participación infantil y juvenil en América Latina. México: UAM; 2007.
Lyubomirsky S, Lepper S. A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation. Soc Indic Res. 1999;46:137–55.
Maxwell J. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. New York: Sage; 1996.
Mieles Barrera M, Tonon G. Children’s quality of life in the Caribbean: a qualitative study. In: Tonon G, editor. Qualitative studies in quality of life methodology and practice, Social indicators research series, vol. 55. Switzerland: Springer; 2015. p. 121–48.
Moreno R. Everyday instruction: a comparison of Mexican American and Anglo mothers and their preschool children. Hisp J Behav Sci. 1997;19:527–39.
Moore KA, Lippman L, Brown B. Indicators of child well-being: The promise for positive youth development. The annals of the american academy of political and social science. 2004;591(1):125–145.
Peterson C. The strengths revolution: a positive psychology perspective. Reclaiming Child Youth. 2013;21(4):7–14.
Pita Fernández S, Pértegas Díaz S. Investigación cuantitativa y cualitativa. Cad Aten Primaria. 2002;9:76–8. http://www.fisterra.com/mbe/investiga/cuanti_cuali/cuanti_cuali.asp
Powell MA, Graham A, Taylor NJ, Newell S, Fitzgerald R. Building capacity for ethical research with children and young people: an international research project to examine the ethical issues and challenges in undertaking research with and for children in different majority and minority world contexts – report prepared for the Childwatch International Research Network. Oslo, Norway. 2011. Retrieved from http://epubs.scu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=ccyp_pubs. Accessed 26 Jun 2014.
Prosser J, Burke C. Image-based educational research: childlike perspectives. In: Knowles JG, Cole A, editors. Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: perspectives, methodologies, examples and issues. London: Sage; 2008. p. 407–20.
Punch S. Research with children: the same or different from research with adults? Childhood. 2002;9(3):321–41.
Rabello de Castro L. Participación política en el contexto escolar: experiencias de jóvenes en acción colectiva. In: Corona Caraveo Y, Linares Pontón ME, editors. Participación infantil y juvenil en América Latina. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; 2007. p. 17–45.
Rodriguez Pascual I. Redefiniendo el trabajo metodológico cualitativo con niños: el uso de la entrevista de grupo aplicada al estudio de la tecnología EMPIRIA. Rev Metodología Cienc Soc. 2006;12:65–88. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=297124008003. Accessed 23 Jul 2015
Roer-Strier D, Rosenthal MK. Socialization in changing cultural contexts: a search for images of the “adaptive adult”. Soc Work. 2001;46(3):215–28.
Sampieri RH, Collado CF, Lucio PB. Metodología de la investigación. México: Edición McGraw-Hill; 1996.
Sanders J, Munford R, Liebenberg L. Young people, their families and social supports: understanding resilience with complexity theory. In: Ungar M, editor. The social ecology of resilience. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 233–43.
Scott J. Children as respondents: the challenge for quantitavive methods. In: Christensen P, James A, editors. Research with children: perspectives and practices. London: Routledge; 2000. p. 98–119.
Sen A. Desarrollo y libertad. Bogota: Ed. Planeta; 2000.
Szapocznik J, Kurtines WM. Family psychology and cultural diversity: opportunities for theory, research, and application. Am Psychol. 1993;48:400–7.
Tonon G. Young people’s quality of life and construction of citizenship, Series SpringerBriefs in well-being and quality of life research. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012.
Tonon G, editor. Qualitative studies in quality of life methodology and practice, Social indicators research series, vol. 55. Cham: Springer; 2015.
WHO. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2012.
Yelland G, Pollard J, Mercuri A. The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language. Appl Psycholinguist. 1993;14:423–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Tonon, G., de la Vega, L.R., Benatuil, D. (2017). Researching with Children. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_123-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_123-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences