Advertisement

Schema Analysis of Qualitative Data: A Team-Based Approach

  • Frances Rapport
  • Patti Shih
  • Mia Bierbaum
  • Anne Hogden
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Schema analysis is a novel, qualitative data analysis technique that uses a summative approach to make sense of complex, nuanced, textual data. It aims to ensure that key features of a text, or “essential elements,” are revealed before any interpretation of those key elements takes place, based on the assertion that data should be handled in a principled, informed, and strategic manner to achieve phenomenal clarity. Teamwork is a central element of schema analysis, enabling researchers to effectively co-create meaning across disciplinary boundaries through consensus-driven strategies. The research team’s shared accountability for interpretive decisions is clearly linked to a study’s original questions and the research team’s desire to be rigorous in their collaborative stance and equally vocal. Schema analysis can be used in the context of a wide range of qualitative studies or can sit alongside outputs from other mixed-methods studies to add substance to their findings. The technique has been successfully developed and refined by the lead author, to suit a wide variety of healthcare scenarios, evidenced by published research projects from UK and Australian contexts. In this chapter, the method is presented in detail, step by step. An example of the use of schema analysis in practice is offered up from a recent Australian study that examined multidisciplinary team-working practices in oncology. Study data from an interview with an oncology psychologist working as part of an oncological multidisciplinary team is considered, to reveal how healthcare professionals present information about risk to women with breast cancer. The chapter considers methodological implications for achieving validity and rigor, upholding trustworthiness in data, and creating data that are transferable to different settings. To conclude, the chapter reflects on future opportunities for the method’s use in qualitative research.

Keywords

Schema analysis Team-working Qualitative data Consensus-driven approach 

References

  1. Fleming J, Ward D. Self-directed groupwork–social justice through social action and empowerment. Crit Radic Soc Work. 2017;5(1):75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Iredale R, Rapport F, Sivell S, Jones W, Edwards A, Gray J, Elwyn G. Exploring the requirements for a decision aid on familial breast cancer in the UK context: a qualitative study with patients referred to a cancer genetics service. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(1):110–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. N Dir Eval. 1986;1986(30):73–84.Google Scholar
  4. Long T, Johnson M. Rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research. Clin Eff Nurs. 2000;4(1):30–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mauthner NS, Doucet A. ‘Knowledge once divided can be hard to put together again’: an epistemological critique of collaborative and team-based research practices. Sociology. 2008;42(5):971–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rapport F. Summative analysis: a qualitative method for social science and health research. Int J Qual Methods. 2010;9(3):270–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rapport F, Hartill G. Poetics of memory: in defence of literary experimentation with holocaust survivor testimony. Anthropol Humanism. 2010;35(1):20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rapport F, Hartill G. Making the case for poetic inquiry in health services research poetic inquiry II–seeing, caring, understanding. Rotterdam, Springer; 2016. p. 211–26.Google Scholar
  9. Rapport F, Iredale R, Jones W, Sivell S, Edwards A, Gray J, Elwyn G. Decision aids for familial breast cancer: exploring women’s views using focus groups. Health Expect. 2006;9(3):232–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rapport F, Jerzembek G, Seagrove A, Hutchings H, Russell I, Cheung W-Y. Evaluating new initiatives in the delivery and organization of gastrointestinal endoscopy services (the ENIGMA study): focus groups in Wales and England. Qual Health Res. 2010;20:922–30.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309354282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rapport F, Clement C, Doel MA, Hutchings HA. Qualitative research and its methods in epilepsy: contributing to an understanding of patients’ lived experiences of the disease. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;45:94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rapport F, Bierbaum M, Hughes S, Lau A, Boisvert I, Braithwaite J, McMahon C. Behavioural and attitudinal responses to cochlear implantation in Australia and the UK: a study protocol. under review.Google Scholar
  13. Rapport F, Sparkes AC. Narrating the holocaust: In pursuit of poetic representations of health. Medical Humanities. 2009;35(1):27–34.Google Scholar
  14. Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln Y, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 769–802.Google Scholar
  15. Shih P, Rapport F, Hogden A, Bierbaum M, Hsu J, Boyages J, Braithwaite J. Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social influences on patients’ capacity for decision-making. under review.Google Scholar
  16. Silverman D. Analyzing talk and text. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln Y, editors. Handbook of qualitative research, vol. 2. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 821–34.Google Scholar
  17. Sparkes A. Telling tales in sport and physical activity: a qualitative journey. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers; 2002.Google Scholar
  18. Thomas E, Magilvy JK. Qualitative rigor or research validity in qualitative research. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2011;16(2):151–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Van Manen M. Modalities of body experience in illness and health. Qual Health Res. 1998;8(1):7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frances Rapport
    • 1
  • Patti Shih
    • 1
  • Mia Bierbaum
    • 1
  • Anne Hogden
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI)Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations