Te puna wai ora, e tu atu nei e: Stand Up, Stand Strong and Be Proud

Living reference work entry

Abstract

An indigenous, specifically Māori worldview is used as the foundation for a case study that describes the people and their relationships and interactions in one New Zealand primary school (ages 5–11). We contextualize this school and its people, within the education and schooling system since the introduction of a new leadership team in 2011. We consider how leaders, teachers, and whānau (family and extended family) have promoted contexts for learning to ensure Māori students can enjoy and achieve education success as Māori (Ministry of Education 2013). Leaders’ and teachers’ beliefs, and their principles for practice, are detailed alongside the changes in Māori students’ experiences. Finally, we consider these principles for practice in terms of their relevance for other indigenous and nonindigenous students. The case concludes in 2017 when, for the second successive year, the school became a finalist in the New Zealand, Prime Minister’s Excellence Awards in Education for teaching and learning.

Keywords

Cultural relationships Responsive pedagogy Equity and excellence School reform 

References

  1. Alton-Lee A (2016) Ka Hikitia: a demonstration report. Ministry of Education, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Berryman M (2008) Repositioning with indigenous discourses of transformation and self-determination. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Waikato, HamiltonGoogle Scholar
  3. Berryman M, Eley E (2017a) Succeeding as Māori: Māori students’ views on our stepping up to the Ka Hikitia challenge. N Z J Educ Stud:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-017-0076-1
  4. Berryman M, Eley E (2017b) Accelerating success and promoting equity through the Ako: critical contexts for change. Asian Educ Stud 2(1):99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berryman M, Macfarlane S (2017) Hopes for the future: Indigenous knowledge as an enabler of potential. Am J Indigenous Stud 1(Special Issue):9–27Google Scholar
  6. Berryman M, Eley E, Ford T, Egan M (2016) Leadership: going beyond personal will and professional skills to give life to Ka Hikitia. University of Waikato, HamiltonGoogle Scholar
  7. Bishop R (1996) Whakawhanaungatanga, collaborative research stories. Dunmore Press, Palmerston NorthGoogle Scholar
  8. Bishop R (2012) Pretty difficult: implementing kaupapa Mori theory in English-medium secondary schools. N Z J Educ Stud 47:38–50Google Scholar
  9. Bishop R, Berryman M (2006) Culture speaks: cultural relationships and classroom learning. Huia Publishers, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. Bishop R, Glynn T (1999) Researching in Māori contexts: an interpretation of participatory consciousness. J Intercult Stud 20(2):167–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bishop R, Berryman M, Wearmouth J (2014a) Te Kotahitanga: towards effective education reform for indigenous. NZCER Press, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Bishop R, Ladwig J, Berryman M (2014b) The centrality of relationships for pedagogy: the whanaungatanga thesis. Am Educ Res J 51(1):184–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Board of Trustees (2012) Invercargill Middle School Report. Board of Trustees, Invercargill.Google Scholar
  14. Bruner J (1999) Culture, mind and education. In: Monn B, Murphy P (eds) Curriculum in context (pp. 148–178). Buckingham, England: Open University Press. [ISBN 1853964220.]Google Scholar
  15. Consedine R, Consedine J (2005) Healing our history: the challenge of the Treaty of Waitangi. Penguin Books, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  16. Denzin N, Lincoln Y (1994) Introduction: entering the field of qualitative research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  17. Education Review Office (2011, 2012, 2014, 2015) Review reports for Invercargill Middle School. Education Review Office, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  18. Education Review Office (2016) Accelerating student achievement: Māori. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from Education Review Office. http://www.ero.govt.nz/how-ero-reviews/accelerating-student-achievement-maori/
  19. Education Review Office (to be released) Series of in-school videos, including Invercargill Middle School, to exemplify the 2017, ERO Review Framework. Education Review Office, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Freire P (1972) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Groff J (2012) The nature of learning: using research to inspire practice, practitioner guide from the innovative learning environments project. OECD Publications, Paris. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/50300814.pdf
  22. Hattie J (2012) Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Hohepa M, Smith G, Smith L, McNaughton S (1992) Te Kōhanga Reo. Hei tikanga ako i te reo Māori: Te Kōhanga Reo as a context for language learning. Educ Psychol 12(3 & 4):333–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hynds A, Averill R, Penetito W, Meyer L, Hindle R, Faircloth S (2016) Examining the impediments to Indigenous strategy and approaches in mainstream secondary schools. Int J Leadersh Educ 19:534–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Invercargill Middle School principal and senior leadership team (unpublished documents) 2012a and 2017 School ChartersGoogle Scholar
  26. Invercargill Middle School principal (unpublished document) 2012b Report to the Board of TrusteesGoogle Scholar
  27. Invercargill Middle School principal and senior leadership team, (unpublished documents) 2017 Application to the New Zealand, Prime Minister’s Excellence Awards in Education for teaching and learningGoogle Scholar
  28. Ladson-Billings G (2006) From the achievement gap to the education debt: understanding achievement in U.S schools. Educ Res 35(7):3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ladson-Billings G (2008) A letter to our next president. J Teach Educ 59(3):235–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawrence D (2011) What can I do about Māori underachievement? SET 3:32–38Google Scholar
  31. Lyle S (2008) Dialogic teaching: discussing theoretical contexts and reviewing evidence from classroom practice. Lang Educ 22:222–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Metge J, Laing P, Kinloch P (1978) Talking past each other: problems of cross cultural communication. Victoria University Press, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  33. Ministry of Education (2007) New Zealand curriculum. Ministry of Education, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. Ministry of Education (2008) Ka Hikitia-Managing for success: the Māori education strategy 2008–2010. Ministry of Education, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. Ministry of Education (2011) Tātaiako: cultural competencies for teachers of Māori learners. Ministry of Education, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  36. Ministry of Education (2013) Ka Hikitia – accelerating success 2013–2017. Ministry of Education, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. New Zealand Teachers Council. (2009). Registered Teacher Criteria Retrieved from http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/sites/default/files/registered-teacher-criteria-eng-2009-10-28.pdf
  38. Office of the Auditor-General (2012) Education for Māori: context for our proposed audit work until 2017. Office of the Auditor-General, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  39. Office of the Auditor-General (2013) Education for Māori: implementing Ka Hikitia – managing for success. Parliamentary paper, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. Office of the Auditor-General (2016) Education for Māori: using information to improve Māori educational success. Office of the Auditor General, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  41. Orange C (1987) The Treaty of Waitangi. Allen & Unwin, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  42. Pere DR (1991) Te Wheke; a celebration of infinite wisdom. Ako Ako Global Learning, GisborneGoogle Scholar
  43. Pihama L, Smith K, Taki M, Lee J (2004) A literature review on Kaupapa Māori and Māori education pedagogy. The International Research Institute for Māori and Indigenous Education, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  44. Shields C, Bishop R, Mazawi AE (2005) Pathologizing practices: the impact of deficit thinking in education. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Sleeter C (ed) (2011) Professional development for culturally responsive and relationship-based pedagogy, 1st edn. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith GH (1997) Kaupapa Māori as transformative praxis. A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education, University of Auckland, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith L (1999) Deecolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. University of Otago Press, DunedinGoogle Scholar
  48. Stake R (1994) Case studies. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 236–247Google Scholar
  49. Stake R (2000) Case studies. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 435–454Google Scholar
  50. Tauma M (2015) Te takanga o te wa: Maori history guidelines for years 1–8. Ministry of Education, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  51. Timar TB, Chyu KK (2010) State strategies to improve low-performing schools: California’s high priority schools grant program. Teachers College Record 112(7):1897–1936.Google Scholar
  52. Timperley H (2008) Teacher professional learning and development. International Bureau of Education, BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Te Kura Toi Tangata, Faculty of EducationThe University of WaikatoTaurangaNew Zealand
  2. 2.Invercargill Middle SchoolInvercargillNew Zealand

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sharon Nelson-Barber
    • 1
  • Zanette Johnson
    • 2
  1. 1.WestEd,CaliforniaUSA
  2. 2.Independent ResearcherHawaiiUSA

Personalised recommendations