Skip to main content

Learning Dynamic Jamming Models in Cognitive Radios

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

Cognitive radio (CR) integrates results from software-defined radio (SDR), machine learning (ML), and neuroscience for smart radio transmission devices. SDR enables devices to be digitally and dynamically configured in online applications; methodologies and techniques developed to introduce self-awareness in existing systems can be based on ML. Specifically, CR can adaptively regulate its internal parameters in response to the changes in the surrounding environment. New physical layer security issues are also emerging, for example, smart jamming attacks aim to reduce the quality of service or to disrupt legitimate communications. In this context, the electromagnetic spectrum represents the environment, while signals inside it are the individual entities. A CR-to-spectrum interaction consists of a dynamic process that can be driven by a CR device. Learning dynamic and measurement models from spectrum data is the main objective in CR applications.

To learn a model, statistical signal processing techniques can be used. Such models can be considered as parametric Bayesian filters that allow a CR to estimate current state of observed entities (including CR itself) and to predict their actions in the near future. Adaptive hierarchical Bayesian filters able to cover nonstationary entity behaviors can be described through probabilistic graphical models (PGM). Interacting entities can be modelled by coupling multiple PGMs related to different entities.

In this chapter, state-of-the-art on representation and learning of dynamic models for physical layer security is introduced along with some future directions. An experimental framework is then presented with two currently investigated applications: Spectrum Intelligence and TV White Spaces (TVWS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Allen JB, Rabiner LR (1977) A unified approach to short-time fourier analysis and synthesis. Proc IEEE 65(11):1558–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baiqiang Y, Yigang H (2015) A fast matrix inverse s-transform algorithm for MCG denoise. In: IEEE international conference on electronic measurement and instruments (ICEMI), Qingdao, pp 315–319

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouachache B, Flandrin P (1982) Wigner-ville analysis of time-varying signals. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing (ICASSP), Paris, pp 1329–1332

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breve FA, Pedronette DCG (2016) Combined unsupervised and semi-supervised learning for data classification. In: 2016 IEEE 26th international workshop on machine learning for signal processing (MLSP), Salerno, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown RA, Lauzon ML, Frayne R (2010) A general description of linear time-frequency transforms and formulation of a fast, invertible transform that samples the continuous s-transform spectrum nonredundantly. IEEE Trans Sig Process 58(1):281–290

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Caro S, Perez-Cruz F, Murillo-Fuentes JJ (2006) Gaussian processes for regression in channel equalization. In: 14th European signal processing conference (EUSIPCO 2006), Florence

    Google Scholar 

  7. Castaldo F, Palmieri FAN, Regazzoni CS (2016) Bayesian analysis of behaviors and interactions for situation awareness in transportation systems. IEEE Trans Intell Trans Syst 17(2):313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiappino S, Marcenaro L, Morerio P, Regazzoni C (2013) Run length encoded dynamic Bayesian networks for probabilistic interaction modeling. In: 21st European signal processing conference (EUSIPCO 2013), Marrakech, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chin W, Li J, Chen H (2015) Low-complexity energy detection for spectrum sensing with random arrivals of primary users. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 65(2):947–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen L (1989) Time-frequency distributions-a review. Proc IEEE 77(7):941–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dabčević K, Marcenaro L, Regazzoni CS (2014) SPD-driven smart transmission layer based on a software defined radio test bed architecture. In: 4th international conference on pervasive and embedded computing and communication systems (PECCS), Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dabčević K, Mughal M, Marcenaro L, Regazzoni CS (2014) Spectrum intelligence for interference mitigation for cognitive radio terminals. In: Wireless innovation forum European conference on communications technologies and software defined radio (WInnComm-Europe), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  13. Damasio A (2000) The feeling of what happens: body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Recorded Books, Prince Frederick

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daubechies I (1990) The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 36(5):961–1005

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Dhar S, Cherkassky V (2017) Universum learning for SVM regression. In: 2017 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), Anchorage, pp 3641–3648

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dore A, Regazzoni C (2010) Interaction analysis with a Bayesian trajectory model. IEEE Intell Syst 25(3):32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dore A, Cattoni AF, Regazzoni CS (2010) Interaction modeling and prediction in smart spaces: a bio-inspired approach based on autobiographical memory. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Humans 40(6):1191–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dzakmic S, Namas T, Dzafic I (2017) Fault classification using multi-resolution analysis and discrete wavelet transforms. In: 2017 XXVI international conference on information, communication and automation technologies (ICAT), Sarajevo, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fiaschetti A, Noll J, Azzoni P, Uribeetxeberria R (2017) Measurable and composable security, privacy, and dependability for cyberphysical systems: the SHIELD methodology. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fox E, Sudderth EB, Jordan MI, Willsky AS (2011) Bayesian nonparametric inference of switching dynamic linear models. IEEE Trans Signal Process 59(4):1569–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghahramani Z (2001) An introduction to hidden Markov models and Bayesian networks. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 15(01):9–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gomes SR, Saroar SG, Mosfaiul M, Telot A, Khan BN, Chakrabarty A, Mostakim M (2017) A comparative approach to email classification using naive Bayes classifier and hidden Markov model. In: 2017 4th international conference on advances in electrical engineering (ICAEE), Dhaka, pp 482–487

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y (2014) Generative adversarial networks. ArXiv e-prints 1406.2661

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hsu D, Sham MK, Zhang T (2012) A spectral algorithm for learning hidden Markov models. J Comput Syst Sci 78(5):1460–1480. JCSS Special Issue: Cloud Computing 2011

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huang N et al (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc London Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 454(1971):903–995

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Jesus MAD, Teixeira M, Vicente L, Rodriguez Y (2006) Nonuniform discrete short-time fourier transform a goertzel filter bank versus a fir filtering approach, vol 2. In: 2006 49th IEEE international midwest symposium on circuits and systems, Island of Kos, pp 188–192

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jokanovic B, Amin MG, Ahmad F (2016) Effect of data representations on deep learning in fall detection. In: 2016 IEEE sensor array and multichannel signal processing workshop (SAM), Rio de Janerio, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kapoor S, Rao S, Singh G (2011) Opportunistic spectrum sensing by employing matched filter in cognitive radio network. In: 2011 international conference on communication systems and network technologies (CSNT 2011), Proceedings of a meeting held 3–5 June 2011, Katra, Jammu, pp 580–583

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kingma D, Welling M (2013) Auto-encoding variational Bayes. ArXiv e-prints 1312.6114

    Google Scholar 

  30. Koller D, Friedman N (2009) Probabilistic graphical models: principles and techniques – adaptive computation and machine learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Y, Cai B (2015) A reliability analysis framework based on time-varying dynamic Bayesian network. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM), Singapore, pp 21–25

    Google Scholar 

  32. Maggio M, Abdelzaher T, Esterle L, Giese H, Kephart J, Mengshoel O, Papadopoulos A, Robertsson A, Wolter K (2017) Self-adaptation for individual self-aware computing systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 375–399

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Malegori G, Ferrini G (2010) Tip-sample interactions on graphite studied using the wavelet transform. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 1:172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nawaz T, Mughal M, Marcenaro L, Regazzoni C (2015) Exploiting cyclic features for jammer detection in wide-band cognitive radios. In: WInnComm-Europe’15, Erlangen

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nazábal A, Artés-Rodríguez A (2015) Discriminative spectral learning of hidden Markov models for human activity recognition. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), South Brisbane, pp 1966–1970

    Google Scholar 

  36. Qin Z, Gao Y, Plumbley M, Parini C (2016) Wideband spectrum sensing on real-time signals at sub-nyquist sampling rates in single and cooperative multiple nodes. IEEE Trans Signal Process 64(12):3106–3117

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Qin Z, Gao Y, Plumbley MD (2018) Malicious user detection based on low-rank matrix completion in wideband spectrum sensing. IEEE Trans Signal Process 66(1):5–17

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Ravanbakhsh M, Nabi M, Sangineto E, Marcenaro L, Regazzoni CS, Sebe N (2017) Abnormal event detection in videos using generative adversarial nets. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP), Beijing, pp 1577–1581

    Google Scholar 

  39. Satija U, Mohanty M, Ramkumar B (2015) Automatic modulation classification using s-transform based features. In: 2nd international conference on signal processing and integrated networks (ICSPIN), South Brisbane, pp 708–712

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stockwell RG, Mansinha L, Lowe RP (1996) Localization of the complex spectrum: the S transform. IEEE Trans Signal Process 44(4):998–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Suk HI, Sin BK, Lee SW (2009) Analyzing human interactions with a network of dynamic probabilistic models. In: 2009 workshop on applications of computer vision (WACV), Snowbird, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tian Z, Giannakis G (2006) A wavelet approach to wideband spectrum sensing for cognitive radios. In: IEEE 1st international conference on cognitive radio oriented wireless networks and communications, Crowncom, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wan C, Probst T, Gool LV, Yao A (2017) Crossing nets: combining GANs and VAEs with a shared latent space for hand pose estimation. In: 2017 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, pp 1196–1205

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang H, Hu D (2005) Comparison of SVM and LS-SVM for regression. In: 2005 international conference on neural networks and brain, Beijing, vol 1, pp 279–283

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wang H, Raj B (2017) On the origin of deep learning. ArXiv e-prints 1702.07800

    Google Scholar 

  46. Xinzhi Z, Feifei G, Rong C, Tao J (2015) Matched filter based spectrum sensing when primary user has multiple power levels. China Commun 12(2):21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang D, Xue G, Zhang J, Richa A, Fang X (2013) Coping with a smart jammer in wireless networks: a stackelberg game approach. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 12(8):4038–4047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zou Y, Zhu J, Wang X, Hanzo L (2016) A survey on wireless security: technical challenges, recent advances, and future trends. Proc IEEE 104(9):1727–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Toma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Toma, A., Regazzoni, C., Marcenaro, L., Gao, Y. (2018). Learning Dynamic Jamming Models in Cognitive Radios. In: Zhang, W. (eds) Handbook of Cognitive Radio . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1389-8_64-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1389-8_64-1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1389-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1389-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics