Contexts, Debates, Histories, and Futures of Post-Graduate Education in Higher Education

  • Ronel Erwee
  • Meredith A. Harmes
  • Marcus K. Harmes
  • Patrick Alan Danaher
  • Fernando F. Padró
Living reference work entry
Part of the University Development and Administration book series (UDAA)


Reimagining the development and administration of contemporary universities in the twenty-first century must include a reconsideration of the purposes, character, and effects of post-graduate education. Such a reconsideration must in turn entail interrogating the contexts in which post-graduate education is enacted, the debates attending those contexts, the histories marking the growth of key elements of post-graduate education, and also potential alternative futures for prospective initiatives and innovations in post-graduate education.

In foretelling the subsequent chapters in the handbook, clustered around five sections, this chapter assembles these contexts, debates, histories, and futures in ways that highlight that the genealogies of post-graduate education, as well as its current manifestations, are by no means consistent, even, or teleological. On the contrary, developments in one part of the world were resisted for considerable time in other parts, as illustrated by the widely divergent dates of the first awards of the PhD degree in different countries. At the same time, the chapter also accentuates the commonality and consistency of certain themes related to post-graduate education, including the expected contributions by doctorates to generating new knowledge, the sometimes countervailing pressures that such knowledge should have practical applications and implications, and currently the seemingly irresistible rise and global impact of neoliberalism in relation to doctoral study and supervision.


Digital futures Doctoral supervision Historical perspective Managing doctoral programs Neoliberalism Post-graduate careers Post-graduate education Post-graduate pedagogy Student–supervisor relationships University contexts 


  1. Åkerlind, Gerlese, and Lynn McAlpine. 2017. Supervising doctoral students: Variation in purpose and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education 42: 1686–1689. Scholar
  2. Axtell, James. 2016. Wisdom’s workshop: The rise of the modern university. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bettinger, Eric P., Bridget Terry Long, and Eric S. Taylor. 2016. When inputs are outputs: The case of graduate student instructors. Economics of Education Review 52: 63–76. Scholar
  4. De Meyer, Arnoud. 2013. The future of doctoral education in business administration. Journal of Management Development 32 (5): 447–486. Scholar
  5. Forsyth, Hannah. 2014. A history of the modern Australian university. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
  6. Goldberger, Marvin L., Brendan A. Maher, and Pamela Ebert Flattau. 1995. Research doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Haskell, Thomas L. 1977. The emergence of professional social science: The American Social Science Association and the nineteenth-century crisis of authority. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  8. Haskins, Charles Homer. 1957. The rise of universities. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hogan, John, and Mark Clark. 1996. Postgraduate and research organization and management. In Higher education management: The key elements, ed. David Warner and David Palfreyman, 117–135. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Holligan, Chris, and I. Ibrahim Sirkeci. 2011. Measuring academic research performance through audit at the expense of trust: Exploring the 21st century university. Border Crossing: Transnational Working Papers 1104: 45–59. Retrieved from Scholar
  11. Hyatt, Susan Brin, Boone W. Shear, and Susan Wright, eds. 2015. Learning under neoliberalism: Ethnographies of governance in higher education. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  12. Ingleby, Ewan. 2015. The house that Jack built: Neoliberalism, teaching in higher education and the moral objections. Teaching in Higher Education 20: 518–529. Scholar
  13. Kamler, Barbara, and Pat Thomson. 2014. Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Knowles, Asa Smallidge, ed. 1970. Handbook of college and university administration. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Knowles, Asa Smallidge, ed. 1977. The international encyclopedia of higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Kohler, Robert E. 1990. The Ph.D machine: Building on the collegiate base. Isis 81 (4): 638–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leinster-Mackay, D.P. 1978. The idea of a university: A historical perspective on some precepts and practices. Vestes 20 (4): 28–33.Google Scholar
  18. Marshall, Stephanie. 2016. A handbook for leaders in higher education: Transforming teaching and learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. McNiff, Jean, ed. 2016. Values and virtues in higher education research: Critical perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Mukerji, Siran, and Purnendu Tripathi, eds. 2017. Handbook of research on administration, policy, and leadership in higher education. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  21. National Research Council. 1995. Research doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Scholar
  22. Noble, Keith Allan. 1994. Changing doctoral degrees: An international perspective. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Norton, Arthur O. 1909. Readings in the history of education: Medieaval universities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Boyle, Lenore. 1983. Learning for its own sake: The German university as nineteenth-century model. Comparative Studies in Society and History 25 (1): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Park, Chris. 2005. New variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (2): 189–207. Scholar
  26. Rashdall, Hastings. 2010 [1895]. The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages Volume 1: Salerno, Bologna, Paris. Cambridge Library Collection.Google Scholar
  27. Shand Tucci, Douglas. 2005. An architect’s four quests: Medieval, modernist, American, ecumenical. Amherst\Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, Stan, Margaret Kiley, and Robin Humphrey. 2018. A handbook for doctoral supervisors. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Verger, J. 1992. Teachers. In A history of the university in Europe volume 1: Universities in the middle ages, ed. Walter Ruegg, 144–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronel Erwee
    • 1
  • Meredith A. Harmes
    • 1
  • Marcus K. Harmes
    • 1
  • Patrick Alan Danaher
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fernando F. Padró
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  2. 2.Central Queensland UniversityRockhamptonAustralia

Personalised recommendations