Skip to main content

New Media, Religion, and Politics: A Comparative Investigation into the Dialogue Between the Religious and the Secular in France and in Vietnam

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 1839 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to highlight the importance of studying religion within digital culture, through the mutual interactions between religion, digital media, and politics. It draws on a comparative empirical investigation into the place of religion in two very distinct societies, France and Vietnam, through two recent phenomena, namely the social circulation of the slogan of solidarity “Pray for Paris” on social media following the terrorist attacks in Paris on 13 November 2015; and, the process and the impacts of Vietnamese digital Catholic communication in the Church-State land disputes during the 2008–2010. Challenging the dominant and popular assumption about religion as a source of anxiety for the public sphere, this study offers a discussion of a potential perspective of dialogue between the religious and the secular by the mediation of the sacred in our complex contemporary societies. Conceived of as an “in-between” category, “sacred forms” proved to be fecund and heuristic, by allowing to identify and to favor a productive tension between the religious and the secular, when facing with current diverse radicalisms of all kinds in the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abuza Z (2015) Stifling the public sphere: media and civil Society in Vietnam. National Endowment for Democracy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Baubérot J (2004) Laïcité 1905-2005, entre passion et raison. Paris: Le Seuil, “La couleur des idées”

    Google Scholar 

  • Buddenbaum Judith M. Religion and the Media. Oxford Bibliographies. Last visited 17 July 2017. Online at http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756841/obo-9780199756841-0097.xml

  • Calhoun C (2011) Afterword: religion’s many powers. In: Butler J, Habermas J, Taylor C, West C (eds) The power of religion in the public sphere, Edited by Mendieta E, Van Antwerpen J, Afterword by Craig Calhoun, Columbia University Press, New York, pp 118–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell HA (dir) (2013) Digital religion, understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavatorta F (2012) Civil society activism under authoritarian constraints. In: Civil society activism under authoritarian rule: a comparative perspective. Routledge, London and New York, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtade P, Saint-Martin I (2016) L’expression du religieux dans la sphère publique. Comparaisons internationales. Paris: La Documentation française

    Google Scholar 

  • Douyère D et al (2015) Les religions au temps du numérique, tic&société [En ligne], vol 9, n 1–2, 2ème semestre 2015, mis en ligne le 08 janvier 2016. https://ticetsociete.revues.org/1820

  • Douyère D (2016) Le Christianisme en communication(s). In: et al. (ed) Communication & langages, vol 2016. Numéro, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, p 189

    Google Scholar 

  • Duteil-Ogata F, Jonveaux I, Kuczynski L, Nizard S (dir) (2015) Le religieux sur internet. AFSR, L’Harmattan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis M, Knott K (2015) Return? It never left: exploring the “sacred” as a resource for bridging the gap between the religious and the secular. In: Kutz C, Riss H, Roy O (eds) Religious norms in the public sphere: proceedings of a conference held at UC Berkeley on May 6–7, 2011. European University Institute, Florence, pp 48–57, 10 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie M, Herbert DEJ, Greenhill A (eds) (2013) Social Media and religious change. De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1978) Politik, Kunst, Religion: Essays über zeitgenössische Philosophen. Stuggart, Reclam

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J, Ratzinger J (2006) The dialectics of secularization. On reason and religion. Ignatius Press, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen P (2005) The Vietnamese state, the Catholic Church and the law. In: Gillespie J, Nicholson P (eds) Asian socialism and legal change: the dynamics of Vietnamese and Chinese reform. Asian Pacific Press, Canberra, pp 310–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes J (2005) Chapter 15. Religion and politics. In: Woodhead L, Partridge C, Kawanami H (eds) Religion in the modern world: traditions and transformations. Routledge, London, pp 365–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjarvard S (2008a) The mediatization of religion: a theory of the media as agents of religious change. Northen Lights 6:9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjarvard S (2008b) The mediatization of society: a theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Rev 29(105):34

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang AN (2016) “PrayforParis” de la performance communicative d’un hashtag au questionnement de la place de religions dans la sphère publique”, In: Religions, laïcités et sociétés au tournant des humanités numériques, Actes du 3è colloque international ComSymbol. Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier, Montpellier, 3, 9–10 Nov 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover SM (2006) Religion in the media age. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope Cheong P, Fischer-Nielsen P, Gelfgren S, Ess C (2012) Digital religion, social media and culture: perspectives, practices and futures. Peter Lang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovdelien O (2011) Post-secular consensus? On the Munich-dialogue between Joseph Ratzinger and Jürgen Habermas. Aust eJ Theol 18(2):107–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanneret Y (2015) Critique de la trivialité: Les médiations de la communication, enjeu de pouvoir. Editions non standard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien F (2012) “L’écart et l’entre. Ou comment penser l’altérité”, FMSH-WP-2012-03. 2012. halshs-00677232. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00677232

  • Lynch G (2011) Mediation of sacred forms. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch G (2012) The sacred in the modern world: a cultural sociological approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundby K (2012) Theoretical frameworks for approaching religion and new media. In: Campbell HA (ed) Digital religion. Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge, London, pp 225–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahan JH (2014) Media, religion and culture: an introduction. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marechal D, MÉadel C, Veyrat-Masson I (2011) Communiquer le sacré. Le Temps des Médias, vol 17. Nouveau Monde éd., Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin D (2008) The religious and the political. In: Barker E (ed) The centrality of religion in social life, essays in Honour of James A. Beckford. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Barbero J (1993) Communication, culture and hegemony: from the media to mediations. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen T-G (2010) When lack of impartiality makes an impact: a comparative study of VietCatholic and the BBC. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder M, Schmidt J (2010) Habermas and religion. In: An awareness of what is missing. Faith and reason in a Post-Secular Age. Polity Press, Habermas et al, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasi B (2004) Commission de réflexion sur l’application du principe de laïcité dans la République. Paris, La Documentation française: Présidence de la République

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P (2008) Modernity and Re-enchantment in Post-revolutionary Vietnam. In: Taylor P (ed) Modernity and Re-enchantment: religion in Post-revolutionary Vietnam. Lexington Books, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham; [2007] Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS), Singapore, pp 1–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer CA (2009) Political legitimacy of Vietnam’s one party-state: challenges and responses. J Curr Southeast Asian Aff 28(4):47–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer CA (2014) The apparatus of authoritarian rule in Vietnam. In: London JD (ed) Politics in contemporary Vietnam. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Willaime J-P (2008) The paradoxes of Laïcité in France. In: Barker E (ed) The centrality of religion in social life, essays in Honour of James A. Beckford. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Willaime J-P (2016) Les bénéfices démocratiques d’une laïcité inclusive. In: Courtade P, Saint-Martin I (eds) L’expression du religieux dans la sphère publique. Comparaisons internationales. La Documentation française, Paris, pp 193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2016) Social media and youth radicalization in digital age. Background Note, online: document http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/news/background_social_media_radicalization.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anh Ngoc Hoang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hoang, A.N. (2020). New Media, Religion, and Politics: A Comparative Investigation into the Dialogue Between the Religious and the Secular in France and in Vietnam. In: Hunsinger, J., Allen, M., Klastrup, L. (eds) Second International Handbook of Internet Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics