Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Online Field Theory

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Second International Handbook of Internet Research

Abstract

Though massive amounts of digital trace data can be collected about how people and information connect online, the question of why they do so has been given less attention. This chapter addresses the spread of innovations and controversies by asking why some actors choose to connect to new issues while others do not? To answer this question, a new framework combining field theory with social network analysis (SNA) – online field theory – is proposed. Field theory suggests that actors in social spaces are unequal and strive to change this inequality, and SNA provides a framework for testing hypotheses emerging from field theory. The framework also draws some elements from actor-network theory (ANT), such as the incorporation of nonhuman actors, but – unlike ANT – empirically examining actor choices mandates the establishment of distinctions between the agency of different categories of actors. These different types of agency interact in mutually constitutive ways with field boundaries: while field structure is readily apparent in Web 1.0 organizational fields – such as the online environmental movement – the lack of information about actor identities in some Web 2.0 settings complicates field analysis. The chapter also examines how online field theory can provide insight into how Web 2.0 algorithmic governance, customization, and personalization are contributing to the emergence of online echo chambers. We define “filter bubbles” as online fields characterized by low contention and high homophily and outline how research into actor connection to innovation should approach them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackland R, O’Neil M (2011) Online collective identity: the case of the environmental movement. Soc Networks 33(3):177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackland R, O’Neil M, Perez C (2018a) Collective action frames on Twitter. Sociology Working Paper, Australian National University

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson C (2008) The end of theory: the data revolution makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired. 23 June

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1985) The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory Soc 14:723–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P, Wacquant LJD (1992) An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd d m (2010) Social Network Sites as networked publics: affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: Papacharissi Z (ed) Networked self: identity, community, and culture on Social Network Sites. Routledge, London, pp 39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns A, Burgess JE (2011) The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In: Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) general conference 2011. University of Iceland, Reykjavik

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (2004) The power of identity. The information age: economy, society and culture, vol 2, 2nd edn. Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (2012) Networks of outrage and hope: social movements in the Internet age. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis C (1986) Les carrefours du labyrinthe II: Domaines de l’homme. Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateauraynaud F (2014) Trajectoires argumentatives et constellations discursives: Exploration socio-informatique des futurs vus depuis le nanomonde. Réseaux 188(6):121–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft S, Vos TP, Wolfgang JD (2016) Reader comments as press criticism: Implications for the journalistic field. Journalism 17(6): 677–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook S, Pakulski J (2007) Shades of green: Public opinion on environmental issues in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 30, 39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Nooy W (2003) Fields and networks: correspondence analysis and social network analysis in the framework of field theory. Poetics 31(5–6), 305–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ETC (2003) No small matter II: the case for a global moratorium. Occas Pap Ser 7(1). http://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/publication/165/01/occ.paper_nanosafety.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept 2017

  • Fligstein N (2013) Understanding stability and change in fields. Res Organ Behav 33:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein N, McAdam D (2012) A theory of fields. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frayssé O, O’Neil M (2015) Hacked in the USA: prosumption and digital labour. In: Frayssé O, O’Neil M (eds) Digital labour and prosumer capitalism: the US matrix. Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson WW (1975) The strategy of social protest. Dorsey Press, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrido M, Halavais A (2003) Mapping networks of support for the Zapatista movement: applying social network analysis to study contemporary social movements. In: McCaughey M, Ayers M (eds) Cyberactivism: online activism in theory and practice. Routledge, London, pp 165–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo P (2012) Tweets and the streets: social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo P (2016) Social media teams as digital vanguards: the question of leadership in the management of key Facebook and Twitter accounts of Occupy Wall Street, Indignados and UK Uncut. Inf Commun Soc 20(2): 185–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Bailón S (2014) Online social networks and bottom-up politics. In: Dutton WH, Graham M (eds) Society and the Internet: how networks of information and communication are changing our lives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 209–221

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gruzd A, Wellman B, Takhteyev Y (2011) Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. Am Behav Sci 55(10):1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haussler T, Adam S, Schmid-Petri H, Reber U (2017) How political conflict shapes online spaces: a comparison of climate change hyperlink networks in the United States and Germany. Int J Commun 11. Available at http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5644. Accessed 22 Sept 2017

  • Haythornthwaite C (2007) Social networks and online community. In: Joinson A, McKenna K, Reips U, Postmes T (eds) Oxford handbook of internet psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 121–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine C (2015) Ethnography for the Internet. London: Bloomsbury Academic

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito M (2008) Introduction. In: Varnelis K (ed) Networked publics. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MH (1997) Assessing the structure of communication on the world wide web. J Comput-Mediat Commun 3(1). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00063.x/abstract. Accessed 22 Sept 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juris JS (2012) Reflections on #occupy everywhere: social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. Am Ethnol 39(2):259–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kölher W (1929) Gestalt psychology. Liveright, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans R (2004) Movements and media: selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory Soc 33(3/4):367–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B, Jensen P, Venturini T, Grauwin S, Boullier D (2012) ‘The whole is always smaller than its parts’ – a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. Br J Sociol 63(4):590–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawley E (1994) The sociology of culture in computer-mediated communication: an initial exploration. http://www.williambowles.info/mimo/refs/bourdieu.html. Accessed 22 Sept 2017

  • Levi Martin J, Gregg F (2015) Was Bourdieu a field theorist? In: Hilgers M, Mangez E (eds) Bourdieu’s theory of social fields: concepts and applications. Routledge, Oxon, UK, pp 39–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Levidow L (2000) Pollution metaphors in the UK biotechnology controversy. Sci Cult 9(3):325–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marres N, Moats D (2015) Mapping controversies with social media: the case for symmetry. Social Media + Society 1:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN (1996) Comparative perspectives on social movements: political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Monge P, Contractor N (2003) Theories of Communication Networks. Oxford: OUP

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers S, Leskovec J (2012) Clash of the contagions: cooperation and competition in information diffusion. In: Brussels, IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM)

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil M (2005) Blogs and authority. Blogtalk Downunder, University Technology Sydney, 19–22 May. http://incsub.org/blogtalk/?page_id=107. Accessed 22 Sept 2017

  • O’Neil M (2006) Rebels for the system? Virus writers, general intellect, cyberpunk and criminal capitalism. Continuum 20(2):225–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil M (2009) Cyberchiefs: autonomy and authority in online tribes. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil M (2011) Domination & networks: a response to Nathaniel Tkacz. J Peer Prod 0. http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/debate-ant-and-power/domination-networks/. Accessed 22 Sept 2017

  • O’Neil M (2014) Hacking Weber: legitimacy, critique, and trust in peer production. Inf Commun Soc 17(7):872–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil M, Ackland R (2018) Competition in an online environmental social movement field. Under review

    Google Scholar 

  • Onnela J-P, Reed-Tsochas F (2010) Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(43):18375–18380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pariser E (2011) The filter bubble: how the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Park HW, Thelwall M (2008) Link analysis: hyperlink patterns and social structure on politicians’ web sites in South Korea. Qual Quant 42(5):687–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R, Zelman A (2002) Surfing for knowledge in the information society. In: Elmer G (ed) Critical perspectives on the Internet. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R, Sánchez-Querubín N, Kil A (2015) Issue mapping for an ageing Europe. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumate M, Dewitt L (2008) The north/south divide in NGO hyperlink networks. J Comput-Mediat Commun 13:405–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow DA, Rochford BR Jr, Worden SK, Benford RD (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. Am Sociol Rev 51:464–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderberg J (2011) ANT & Hegelian Marxism. J Peer Prod 0. http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/debate-ant-and-power/ant-hegelian-marxism/. Accessed 22 Sept 2017

  • Sunstein C (2001) Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz D (2003) From critical sociology to public intellectual: Pierre Bourdieu and politics. Theory Soc 32:791–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner V (1974) Dramas, fields and metaphors. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • van Aelst P, Walgrave S (2004) New media, new movements? The role of the Internet in shaping the ‘anti-globalization’ movement. In: van de Donk W, Loader B, Nixon PG, Rucht D (eds) Cyberprotest. New media, citizens and social movements. Routledge, London/New York, pp 97–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Alstyne, M. and Brynjolfsson, E. (2005). Global village or cyber-balkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Management Science, 51(6):851–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wejnert B (2002) Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a conceptual framework. Annu Rev Sociol 28:297–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman B et al (2003) The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. J Comput-Mediat Commun 8(3):0–0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Sun T, Zhang M, Mei Q (2012) We know what @you #tag: does the dual role affect hashtag adoption. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on world wide web. ACM, New York, pp 261–270

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. News & Media Research Centre, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Mathieu O’Neil

  2. School of Sociology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Robert Ackland

Authors
  1. Mathieu O’Neil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Ackland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathieu O’Neil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada

    Jeremy Hunsinger

  2. IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Lisbeth Klastrup

  3. Bldg. 209, 3rd Floor, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia

    Matthew M. Allen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

O’Neil, M., Ackland, R. (2019). Online Field Theory. In: Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L., Allen, M. (eds) Second International Handbook of Internet Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_9-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_9-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1202-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1202-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Online Field Theory
    Published:
    11 October 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_9-2

  2. Original

    Online Field Theory
    Published:
    04 July 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_9-1

Search

Navigation