Abstract
The Internet has emerged as the ultimate platform for convergence on the levels of technology, industry, and market due to its nondiscriminatory, best-effort architecture. All these levels of convergence are propelled by ideas, ideologies, and policies in a progressive and cyclical manner, bringing further technological advancement, industry, market, and policy changes. In response to convergence, net neutrality develops as a contested policy principle for regulating the relationship between Internet access providers and their users with an aim to ensure the openness of the Internet as a platform for creativity, innovation, and free expression for all. A critical analysis of the development of convergence in communications industries, policies, and global net neutrality policies, with the specific cases of the USA, EU, and UK in this chapter, projects ongoing negotiations and controversies concerning the levels of commitment to the nondiscrimination principle of net neutrality. It argues that minimal commitment to or absence of the net neutrality principle will produce a future Internet that continues or exacerbates market concentration in both the infrastructure and content sides of the communications industries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Anderson C (2009a) Free: the future of a radical price. Random House, London
Anderson C (2009b) The longer long tail: how endless choice is creating unlimited demand. Random House Business, London
Aufderheide P (1999) Communications policy and the public interest: the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Guilford Press, New York
Baker CE (2002) Media, markets, and democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
BSG (2016) Open Internet code of practice: voluntary code of practice supporting access to open Internet and transparency of traffic management practices, from http://www.broadbanduk.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/BSG-Open-Internet-Code-2016.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2015
Castells M (2007) Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. Int J Commun 1(1):29
Cave M, Crocioni P (2007) [Special section on net neutrality] Does Europe need network neutrality rules? Int J Commun 1(1):11
Chirico F et al (2007) Network neutrality in the EU. TILEC discussion paper no. 2007-030, from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1018326. Accessed 5 Feb 2014
Cisco (2017) Cisco visual networking index: forecast and methodology, 2016–2021, from https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/complete-white-paper-c11-481360.html. Accessed 2 Sept 2017
Coleman S, Blumler JG (2009) The Internet and democratic citizenship: theory, practice and policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Communication from the European Commission on Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Measures Concerning the European Single Market for Electronic Communications and to Achieve a Connected Continent, and Amending Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/22/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1211/2009 and (EU) No 531/2012, COM(2013) 627 final
Crouch C (2011) The strange non-death of neo-liberalism. Polity, Cambridge
Downes L (2009) The laws of disruption: harnessing the new forces that govern life and business in the digital age. Basic Books, New York
Doyle G (2002) Media ownership: the economics and politics of convergence and concentration in the UK and European media. Sage, London
Economides N (2008) Net neutrality, non-discrimination and digital distribution of content through the internet. ISJLP 4:209
Economides N (2011) Broadband openness rules are fully justified by economic research. Commun Strateg 84(4):1–25
EUROPA (2008) “Audiovisual media services without frontiers” Directive, from http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/audiovisual_and_media/l24101a_en.htm. Accessed 8 Feb 2014
European Commission (2010) Questionnaire: the public consultation on the open Internet and net neutrality in Europe. Information Society and Media Directorate General, Brussels
European Commission (2012) On-line public consultation on “specific aspects of transparency, traffic management and switching in an open Internet.” Digital Agenda for Europe, from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/line-public-consultation-specific-aspects-transparency-traffic-management-and-switching-open. Accessed 8 Feb 2014
European Communities Act (1972) from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1972/68. Accessed 22 January 2014
European Parliament and the Council Directive 2007/65/EC of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities
European Parliament and of the Council Directive 2009/136/EC of 25 November 2009 amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services, Directive 2002/58/EC concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws
European Parliament and the Council Directive 2009/140/EC of 25 November 2009 amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services
FCC (2009) Notice of proposed rulemaking in the matter of protecting and promoting the open Internet and Broadband Industry Practices. Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, from http://torrentfreak.com/static/fcc-09-93a1.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2012
FCC (2011) Preserving the Open Internet: Final Rule. Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-09-23/pdf/2011-24259.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2013
FCC (2014) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Matter of Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet. Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, from http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Busiåness/2014/db0515/FCC-14-61A1.pdf. Accessed 13 January 2015
FCC (2015) Protecting and promoting the open Internet. Washington, DC, from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/04/13/2015-07841/protecting-and-promoting-the-open-internet. Accessed 1 June 2015
FCC (2017) Restoring Internet freedom notice of proposed rulemaking. Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, from https://www.fcc.gov/document/restoring-internet-freedom-notice-proposed-rulemaking. Accessed 2 Sept 2012
FCC (2018) Restoring Internet Freedom. Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/05/11/2018-10063/restoring-internet-freedom. Accessed 22 July 2018
Feintuck M (2004) “The public interest” in regulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Freedman D (2012) Web 2.0 and the death of the blockbuster economy. In: Curran J et al (eds) Misunderstanding the Internet. Routledge, London, pp 69–94
Garnham N (1990) Media theory and the political future of mass communication. In: Capitalism and communication: global culture and the economics of information. Sage, London, pp 1–19
Garnham N (1996) Telecommunications and audio-visual convergence: regulatory issues. Comput Law Secur Rep 12(5):284–287
Garnham N (2011) The political economy of communication revisited. In: Wasko J et al (eds) The handbook of political economy of communications. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
Golding P (2000) Forthcoming features: information and communications technologies and the sociology of the future. Sociology 34(1):165–184
Harvey S (2006) Ofcom’s first year and neoliberalism’s blind spot: attacking the culture of production. Screen 47(1):91–105
Henten A et al (2002) Some implications for regulation of ICT and media convergence. Center for Tele-Information, Technical University of Denmark, from http://www.ictregulationtoolkit.org/En/Document.1471.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2015
Hesmondhalgh D (2007) The cultural industries, 2nd edn. Sage, London
Iosifidis P (2011) Global media and communication policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Jarvis J (2009) What would Google do?: reverse-engineering the fastest growing company in the history of the world. Harper Business, New York
Kang C (2017) F.C.C. Repeals Net Neutrality Rules, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/14/technology/net-neutrality-repeal-vote.html. Accessed 22 July 2018
Lax S (2009) Media and communications technologies: a critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Leal MC (2014) The EU approach to net neutrality: network operators and over-the-top players, friends or foes? Comput Law Secur Rev 30(5):506–520
Lee RS, Wu T (2009) Subsidizing creativity through network design: zero-pricing and net neutrality. J Econ Perspect 23(3):61–76
Livingstone S, Lunt P, Miller L (2007) Citizens and consumers: discursive debates during and after the Communications Act 2003. Media Cult Soc 29(4):613–638
Lynn J et al (2010) Open rights group – joint letter to Ed Vaizey: open Internet. Open Rights Group, from https://www.openrightsgroup.org/ourwork/reports/joint-letter-to-ed-vaizey-open-internet. Accessed 31 Mar 2015
Mansell R (2012) Imagining the Internet: communication, innovation, and governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Marsden CT (2010) Net neutrality: towards a co-regulatory solution. Bloomsbury Academic, London
Marsden CT (2017) Network neutrality: from policy to law to regulation. Manchester University Press, Manchester
McChesney RW (2000) Rich media, poor democracy: communication politics in dubious times. The New Press, New York
McChesney RW (2005) The new global media. In: Bucy EP (ed) Living in the information age: a new media reader. Wadsworth Publ. Co, Belmont
McQuail D (1992) Media performance: mass communication and the public interest. Sage, London
Michalis M (2007) Governing European communications: from unification to coordination. Lexington Books, Plymouth
Michalis M (2014) Infrastructure as a content issue and the convergence between television and broadband Internet: insights from the British market. Int J Digit Telev 5(1):75–90
Murdock G (1990) Redrawing the map of the communications industries: concentration and ownership in the era of privatization. In: Public Communication. Sage, London
Nieminen H (2009) Media in crisis? Social, economic and epistemic dimensions. In: Communicative approaches to politics and ethics in Europe. Tartu University Press, Estonia, pp 31–43
Noam EM (2008) If fiber is the medium, what is the message? Next-generation content for next-generation networks. Commun Strateg, Special Issue, 19–34
OECD (2015) OECD digital economy outlook 2015. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/42577/3222224/Digital+economy+outlook+2015/. Accessed 3 Sept 2015
Ofcom (2010) Traffic management and “net neutrality”: a discussion document. From http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/net-neutrality/summary/netneutrality.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2012
Ofcom (2011) Ofcom’s approach to net neutrality, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/net-neutrality/statement/statement.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2015
Ofcom (2014) Communications market report, from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/cmr/cmr14/2014_UK_CMR.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2015
Parsons P (2003) The evolution of the cable-satellite distribution system. J Broadcast Electron Media 47(1):1–17
Powell A, Cooper A (2011) Net neutrality discourses: comparing advocacy and regulatory arguments in the United States and the United Kingdom. Inf Soc 27(5):311–325
Readon M (2018) Senate Democrats score big win in fight to preserve net neutrality rules, from https://www.cnet.com/news/senate-democrats-win-significant-victory-to-preserve-net-neutrality-rules. Accessed 22 July 2018
Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 of 25 November 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union, OJ L301/1,6 November 2015
Shepardson D (2018) U.S. appeals court in San Francisco will hear net neutrality appeal, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-internet/u-s-appeals-court-in-san-francisco-will-hear-net-neutrality-appeal-idUSKCN1GK380. Accessed 22 July 2018
Sidak JG (2006) A consumer-welfare approach to network neutrality regulation of the Internet. J Compet Law Econ 2(3):349–474
Vaizey E (2010) The open internet – oral statements to parliament, from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-open-internet. Accessed 26 June 2014
Van Cuilenburg J, McQuail D (2003) Media policy paradigm shifts towards a new communications policy paradigm. Eur J Commun 18(2):181–207
Verizon v FCC (2014) 740 F.3d 623, from http://uk.westlaw.com. Accessed 20 November 2014
Yoo CS (2005) Beyond network neutrality. Harv J Law Tech 19:1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Pothong, K. (2018). Convergence, Internet, and Net Neutrality Policy: What the Future Holds for the Internet and Online Content. In: Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L., Allen, M. (eds) Second International Handbook of Internet Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_20-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_20-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1202-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1202-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences