This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altieri, M. A. (2005). The myth of coexistence: Why transgenic crops are not compatible with agroecologically based systems of production. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25(4), 361–371.
Binimelis, R. (2008). Coexistence of plants and coexistence of farmers: Is an individual choice possible? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21(5), 437–457.
Devos, Y., Demont, M., Dillen, K., Reheul, D., Kaiser, M., & Sanvido, O. (2009). Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(1), 11–30.
European Commission. (2002). Life sciences and biotechnology – A strategy for Europe. Luxembourg: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2002)27 final.
European Commission. (2003a). Commission Recommendation of 23 July 2003 on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. Notified under document number C(2003) 2624, (2003/556/EC).
European Commission. (2003b). GMOs: Commission addresses GM crop co-existence, Brussels. Press Release, IP/03/314, 5 Mar.
European Commission. (2010). Commission Recommendation of 13 July 2010 on guidelines for the development of national co-existence measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in conventional and organic crops. offical journal of the european union (2010/c 200/01), 22 July 2010.
IFOAM. (2002). Position on genetic engineering and genetically modified organisms. http://www.ifoam.bio/en/position-genetic-engineering-and-genetically-modified-organisms. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.
Levidow, L., & Boschert, K. (2008). Coexistence or contradiction? GM crops versus alternative agricultures in Europe. Geoforum, 39(1), 174–190.
Marvier, M., & Van Acker, R. C. (2005). Can crop transgenes be kept on a leash? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(2), 93–100.
Mascarenhas, M., & Busch, L. (2006). Seeds of change: Intellectual property rights, genetically modified soybeans and seed saving in the United States. Sociologia Ruralis, 46(2), 122–138.
McAfee, K. (2003). Neoliberalism on the molecular scale. Economic and genetic reductionism in biotechnology battles. Geoforum, 34(2), 203–219.
Phillipson, M. (2015). Class action lawsuits and anti-GM litigation: The legal frontline of coexistence. Contributed paper prepared for presentation at the seventh international conference on coexistence between genetically modified (GM) and non-GM based agricultural supply chains (GMCC-15), Amsterdam, 17–20 Nov 2015.
Rizov, I., & Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. (2014). The European Coexistence Bureau: Five years’ experience. AgBioforum, 17(1), 22–27.
Verrière, P. (2015). Preventing GMO contamination. An overview of national “coexistence” measures in the EU. Brussels: IFOAM EU Group. 30 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Binimelis, R., Wickson, F., Herrero, A. (2019). Agricultural Coexistence. In: Kaplan, D.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_538
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_538
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1178-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1179-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities