Abstract
Boethius’ On Topical Differences (De topicis differentiis) is a monograph in four books on topical argumentation, that is, argumentation based on so-called topoi or loci (literally: “places”). The seminal treatment of this subject is found in Aristotle’s Topics, but Boethius’ treatise served as the main foundation of medieval theorizing in the field for almost two centuries before the gradual rediscovery and introduction of Aristotle’s text. In this way, Boethius defined some of the basic features of the medieval approach to the issue, and as a consequence came also to influence the medieval interpretation of Aristotle’s Topics. This article surveys the surviving medieval commentaries on On Topical Differences and their approach to two questions raised by Boethius’ text, namely, what loci are and how they function.
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Anonymous. (2005). De topicis differentiis (ed.: Hansen, H.). Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin, 76, 45–130.
Boethius. (1978). De topicis differentiis (trans.: Stump, E.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Boethius. (1990). De topicis differentiis (ed. Nikitas, D. Z.). Athens/Paris: The Academy of Athens/Vrin.
Martin of Dacia. (1961). Quaestiones super Librum topicorum Boethii (ed.: Roos, H., Martini de Dacia Opera, pp. 317–327. Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi 2). Copenhagen: G.E.C. Gad.
Peter Abelard. (1969). Super Topica glossae (ed.: dal Pra M., Pietro Abelardo, Scritti di Logica, pp. 206–330). Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
Radulphus Brito. (1978). Quaestiones super Libro topicorum Boethii (ed.: Green-Pedersen, N. J.). Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin, 26, 1–92.
Secondary Sources
Ebbesen, S. (1993). The theory of loci in antiquity and the Middle Ages. In K. Jacobi (Ed.), Argumentationstheorie (pp. 15–39). Leiden: Brill.
Ebbesen, S. (2011). An Argument is a Soul. In I. Rosier-Catach (Ed.), Arts du langage et théologie aux confins des XIe/XIIe siècles: Textes, Maîtres, Débats (Studia Artistarum, 26, pp. 695–708). Turnhout: Brepols.
Green-Pedersen, N. J. (1973). On the interpretation of Aristotle’s Topics in the thirteenth century. Cahiers de l’lnstitut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin, 9, 1–46.
Green-Pedersen, N. J. (1976). Discussions about the status of the Loci Dialectici in works from the middle of the 13th century. Cahiers de l’lnstitut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin, 20, 38–78.
Green-Pedersen, N. J. (1977). The doctrine of ‘Maxima Propositio’ and ‘Locus Differentia’ in commentaries from the 12th century on Boethius’ ‘Topics’. Studia Mediewistyczne, 18(2), 125–163.
Green-Pedersen, N. J. (1984). The tradition of the topics in the Middle Ages. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.
Green-Pedersen, N. J. (1987). The topics in medieval logic. Argumentation, 1, 407–417.
Hansen, H. (2011). In voce/in re in a Late XIth-Century Commentary on Boethius’ Topics. In I. Rosier-Catach (Ed.), Arts du langage et théologie aux confins des XIe/XIIe siècles: Textes, Maîtres, Débats (Studia Artistarum, 26, pp. 693–676). Turnhout: Brepols.
Martin, C. (2009). The development of Abaelard’s theory of topical inference. In J. Biard & F. Mariani Zini (Eds.), Les lieux de l’argumentation: Histoire du syllogisme topique d’Aristote à Leibniz (pp. 249–270). Turnhout: Brepols.
Stump, E. (1989). Dialectic and its place in the development of medieval logic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hansen, H. (2018). Boethius’ De topicis differentiis, Commentaries on. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_89-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_89-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities