Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Thomism

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_496-2

Abstract

In a broad sense, Thomism denotes a form of philosophical and theological thought which draws its main inspiration from the teaching of Thomas Aquinas. Despite differences in context and emphasis, all forms of Thomism purport to follow Aquinas’s doctrine in its principles or main conclusions. In its original scholastic form, Thomism represented the magisterial solution determined by Aquinas, whose adherents were normally, but not always, members of the Dominican order. The development of Thomism from the end of the thirteenth to the end of the sixteenth century can be traced in four main stages: (1) a first stage, roughly from Aquinas’s death in 1274 to the end of the thirteenth century, is marked by the Correctoria controversy, as Dominicans undertook the defense of Thomist teaching in face of external opposition arising from Church authorities and the Franciscan order. (2) On a second stage, from the beginning of the fourteenth century to Aquinas’s canonization in 1323, Thomist teaching is declared the official doctrine of the Dominican order in an effort to dissipate internal opposition and reaffirm its doctrinal credibility after the 1277 condemnation. Although Thomism is still a matter of interpretation, it is during this period that it begins to be established as a distinct philosophy. (3) On a third stage, from Aquinas’s full rehabilitation in 1325 to the end of the fourteenth century, Thomist doctrine gains in normative value. Although opposition still persists, it purports to act as a theological authority within the Church at large. (4) Finally, after a period of relative recession as a result of Dominican unpopularity during the Immaculate Conception controversy, the fifteenth century witnesses a gradual revival of Thomism extending well into the sixteenth. Commentaries on the Summa proliferate; Thomism becomes increasingly systematized and divorced from the dialectical character it owed to its scholastic origins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Dénifle, H., & Chatelain, E. (Eds.). (1889–1891). Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis (2 vols.). Paris: Delalain.Google Scholar
  2. Durandellus. (2003). Nicolai Medensis (Durandelli) Evidentiae contra Durandum (2 vols.) (ed.: Stella, P. T. completed by M. Lanczkowski and R. Imbach). Corpus Philosophorum Medii Aevi: Opera Philosophica Mediae Aetatis Selecta, 3. Tübingen/Basle: A. Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Reichert, B. M. (Ed.). Acta capitulorum generalium Ordinis Praedicatorum. Monumenta Ordinis Fratrum Praedicatorum Historica, 3 and 4, Vol. 1, Rome, 1889, Vol. 2, 1899.Google Scholar
  4. Ripoll, T. (Ed.). (1730). Bullarium Ordinis Fratrum Praedicatorum, sub auspiciis Clementis XII (Vol. 2, pp. 1281–1430). Rome: Mainardi.Google Scholar
  5. Thomas, A. H. (Ed.). (1965). Constitutiones antiquae Ordinis Fratris Praedicatorum. In De oudste constituties van de Dominicanen, Voorgeschiedenis, tekst, bronnen, ontstaan en ontwikkeling (1215–1235), Bibliothèque de la Revue d’Histoire Ecclésiastique, 42.2, Louvain.Google Scholar
  6. Walz, A. (Ed.). (1923–1924). Ordinationes capitulorum generalium de sancto Thoma eiusque cultu et doctrina. Analecta Sacri Ordinis Fratrum Praedicatorum, 16, 168–173.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Burbach, M. (1942). Early Dominican and Franciscan legislation regarding St Thomas. Medieval Studies, 4, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Callus, D.A. (1946). The condemnation of St. Thomas at Oxford (Aquinas papers, no. 5). London: Blackfriars.Google Scholar
  3. Chenu, M.-D. (1957). Introduction à l’étude de Saint Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: J.Vrin.Google Scholar
  4. Decker, B. (1967). Die Gotteslehre des Jakob von Metz. Untersuchungen zur Dominikanertheologie zu Beginn des 14. Jahrhunderts. In R. Haubst (Ed.), Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters. Texte und Untersuchungen, begründet von C. Baeumker, 42.1. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
  5. Garrigou-Lagrange, R. (1943) Thomisme. In A. Vacant, E. Mangenot, & E. Amann (Eds.), Dictionnaire de Théologie Catholique, 15.1 (pp. 823–1023). Paris: Letouzey et Ané.Google Scholar
  6. Gauthier, R. (1961). Introduction historique à S. Thomas d’Aquin. Contra Gentiles (pp. 7–123) (trad: Bernier, R., et Corvez, M., Vol. 1). Paris: Lethielleux.Google Scholar
  7. Gillon, L.-B. (1943). Thomas d’Aquin. Signification historique de la théologie de saint Thomas. In A. Vacant, E. Mangenot, & E. Amann (Eds.), Dictionaire de Théologie Catholique, 15.1 (pp. 651–93). Paris Letouzey et Ané.Google Scholar
  8. Gilson, É. (1944). Le Thomisme: introduction à la philosophie de Saint Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  9. Glorieux, P. (Ed.). (1927). Les premières polémiques thomistes (Bibliothèque thomiste, 9). Le Saulchoir: Kain (Belgium).Google Scholar
  10. Hinnebusch, W. A. (1966). The history of the Dominican order, 1: Origins and growth to 1500. New York: Alba House.Google Scholar
  11. Iribarren, I. (2001). Responsio secundum Thomam and the search for an early Thomistic school. Vivarium, 39, 255–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kennedy, L. A. (1987). A catalogue of Thomists, 1270–1900. Houston: University of St. Thomas.Google Scholar
  13. Mandonnet, P. (1913). Premiers travaux de polémique thomiste. Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques, 7(46–70), 245–262.Google Scholar
  14. Mandonnet, P. (1923). La canonisation de saint Thomas d’Aquin. Mélanges Thomistes, Bibliothèque Thomiste, 3, 3–47. Paris-Kain: Le Saulchoir.Google Scholar
  15. Mortier, D. A. (1903–1920). Histoire des maîtres généraux de l’Ordre des frères prêcheurs (8 vols.). Paris: Alphone Picard et fils.Google Scholar
  16. Prouvost, G. (1996). Thomas d’Aquin et les Thomismes. Paris: Le Cerf.Google Scholar
  17. Robiglio, A. (2007). Appunti sulla prima scuola tomista (1274–1323). I. Aspetti sociali. Bologna: ESD.Google Scholar
  18. Roensch, F. J. (1964). Early Thomistic school. Iowa: The Priory Press.Google Scholar
  19. Saint Thomas au XIVe siècle. (1997). Monographic volume, Revue thomiste, 97.Google Scholar
  20. Storia del tomismo: fonti e reflessi. Atti del IX Congresso tomistico internazionale (Studi tomistici, 45). (1992). Cité du Vatican, Pontificia Accademia di S. Tommaso et di religione cattolica.Google Scholar
  21. Wippel, J. F. (1995). Thomas Aquinas and the condemnation of 1277. The Modern Schoolman, 72, 233–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Catholic TheologyStrasbourg UniversityStrasbourgFrance