Skip to main content

Intentionality

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Abstract

Only during the thirteenth century, were the word “intentionality” and its cognates employed with the philosophical meaning that we nowadays attribute to them. At the beginning of the fourteenth century, moreover, we encounter the first treatises expressly devoted to intentionality. As the Latin etymology of the word indicates (in-tendere), by “intentionality” medieval philosophers mean to express the idea of a directedness or tendency of our mind toward a target. During the Middle Ages, the term was used to characterize the directness of both the mind and the will, although, across time, the term has taken on different meanings and its use has been restricted to the epistemic side alone. In the Middle Ages, intentionality is strictly connected to the explanation of the process of intellectual cognition and concept formation. Since medieval philosophers distinguish between first and second intentions (roughly, concepts of things and concepts of concepts), two major topics have been associated with intentionality: first, the explanation of the nature, the formation, and the foundation of natural-kind concepts, from which the question of the existence of intentional or intramental objects stems, and, second, the predication of intentional or second-order properties with respect to first-order concepts. Generally speaking, the different medieval treatments of intentionality depend on whether a philosopher is more inclined to regard the mind’s intentionality as a special kind of action or rather as a kind of relation from which issue different accounts of the mode of intentional inexistence. In the late Middle Ages, the theory of intentionality is seen as the clue to solve the question of universals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Albert the Great. (1968). De anima (ed.: Stroick, C.). Münster: Aschendorff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1964). Quaestiones de potentia (ed.: Pession, P.M.). Turin: Marietti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1984). Sentencia libri De anima (ed.: Gauthier, R.A.). Rome: Commissio Leonina/Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armand of Bellovisu. (1491). De declaratione difficilium terminorum tam theologiae quam philosophiae ac logicae. Basel: Michael Wenssler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustin. (1968). De trinitate libri XV (ed.: Mountain, W.J.). Turnhout: Brepols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auriol, P. (2005). Scriptum super I Sententiarum, d. 23; Gerard Odonis. Tractatus de secundis intentionibus (pp. 695–747, Appendix F, ed.: de Rijk, L.M.). Leiden: Brill. (partially edited by Pinborg J (1980) Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin 35:133–137, and by Perler D (1994) Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Age 61:242–262).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F. (1973). Psychology from an empirical standpoint (trans: Rancurello, A.C. et al.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito, R. (1975). Sophisma ‘Aliquis homo est species’, Vivarium (vol. 13, pp. 119–152, ed.: Pinborg, J.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duns Scotus, J. (2006). Quaestiones super secundum et tertium De anima (ed.: Bázan, B.C. et al.). Washington/St. Bonaventure: The Catholic University of America Press/The Franciscan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand of Saint-Pourçain. (1572). Scriptum super IV libros Sententiarum. Venice: Ex typographia Guerrae (repr. The Gregg, Ridgewood, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis of Prato. (2000). Tractatus de prima et secunda intentione, Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter (vol. 5, pp 147–174, ed.: Mojsisch, B.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis of Prato. (2005). Tractatus de ente rationis. Gerard Odonis Tractatus de secundis intentionibus (pp. 745–775, Appendix G, ed.: de Rijk, L.M.). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry of Ghent. (1518). Quodlibeta. Paris: Badius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilwardby, R. (1976). De ortu scientiarum (ed.: Judy, A.G.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magister, C. (1981). De intentionibus (ed.: Stroick, C.). Misc Mediaevalia 13(1):517–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew of Gubbio. (1989). Resurgant entia rationis, Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin (vol. 59, pp. 37–60, ed.: Lambertini, R.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Natalis, H. (1489). Tractatus de secundis intentionibus (ed.: Mitelhus, G.). Paris; Doyle, J.P. (ed and English transl) (2008), Marquette University Press, Milwaukee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockham, W. (1974). Summa logicae, Opera philosophica (vol. 1, ed.: Gál, G.). St. Bonaventure: The Franciscan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odonis, G. (2005). Tractatus de secundis intentionibus (ed.: de Rijk, L.M.). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon of Faversham. (1934). Quaestiones super tertium de anima, Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Age (vol. 9, pp. 307–368, ed.: Sharp, D.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon of Faversham. (1969). Sophisma: Universale est intentio, Mediev Stud (vol. 31, pp. 1–14, ed.: Yokoyama, T.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan of Rieti. (1967). Tractatus de secundis intentionibus, Medievalia Philosophica Polonorum (vol. 12, pp. 67–106, ed.: Domanski, J.); Odonis, G. (2005). Tractatus de secundis intentionibus (2nd ed., pp. 777–821, Appendix H, ed.: de Rijk, L.M.). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • William of Alnwick. (1937). Quaestiones de esse intelligibili (ed.: Ledoux, A.). Florence: Bibliotheca Franciscana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodeham, A. (1991). Lectura secundum in I Sententiarum (ed.: Gál, G. and Wood, R.). St. Bonaventure: The Franciscan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Amerini, F. (2005). La logica di Francesco da Prato. Firenze: Edizioni del Galluzzo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amerini, F. (2008). Realism and intentionality: Hervaeus Natalis, Peter Auriol, and William Ockham in discussion. In T. Kobusch et al. (Eds.), Philosophical debates at Paris in the early fourteenth century (pp. 239–260). Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amerini, F. (2010) Later medieval perspectives on intentionality. Quaestiones 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biard, J. (1997). Intention et signification chez Guillaume d’Ockham. La critique de l’être intentionnnel. In A. de Libera, A. Elemrani-Jamal, & A. Galonnier (Eds.), Langages et philosophie. Hommage à Jean Jolivet (pp. 201–220). Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. L. (1999). Mental existence in Thomas Aquinas and Avicenna. Medievales Studies, 61, 45–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brower-Toland, S. (2008). Aquinas on mental representation: Concepts and intentionality. Medievales Review, 117(2), 193–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Libera, A. (1999). Dénomination et intentions: sur quelques doctrines médiévales (XIIIe–XIVe siècle) de la paronymie et de la connotation. In S. Ebbesen & R. L. Friedman (Eds.), Medieval analyses in language and cognition (pp. 355–375). Copenhagen: Reitzels.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rijk, L. M. (2005). A study on the medieval intentionality debate up to ca. 1350. In O. F. M. Giraldus Odonis (Ed.), Opera philosophica, vol II: De intentionibus (pp. 19–357). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. (2006). Hervaeus Natalis, O.P., (d. 1323) on intentionality: Its direction, context, and some aftermath. Modern Schoolman, 83, 85–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R. L. (1999). Peter Aureol on intentions and essential predication. In S. Ebbesen & R. L. Friedman (Eds.), Medieval analyses in language and cognition (pp. 415–430). Copenhagen: Reitzels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. (1965). A medieval discussion of intentionality. In Y. Bar-Hillel (Ed.), Logic, methodology, and philosophy of science (Vol. 4, pp. 425–433). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayen, A. (1942). L’intentionnel dans la philosophie de Saint Thomas. Bruxelles: Edition Universelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A. (1984). Intentionality: Aquinas and Wittgenstein. In The legacy of Wittgenstein (pp. 61–76). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (1984). Anselm’s intentional argument. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 1, 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (2007). Why isn’t the mind–body problem mediaeval? In H. Lagerlund (Ed.), Forming the mind: Essays on the internal senses and the mind/body problem from Avicenna to the medical enlightenment. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (2011). Mental representation. In G. Klima & A. W. Hall (Eds.), Proceedings of the society for medieval logic and metaphysics (Vol. Vol. 4). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. (articles by Klima G, Hochschild JP, Panaccio C, Lagerlund H, Pluta O).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (2015). Intentionality, cognition, and mental representation in the middle ages. Fordham: Fordham University Press. (articles by Read S, Hochschild JP, Pini G, King P, Fiedman RL, Panaccio C, Karger E, Brower-Tolans S, Grellard C, Pluta O, Meier-Oeser S, Klima G).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, C. (1982). Intentions and impositions. In N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny, & J. Pinborg (Eds.), The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy. From the rediscovery of Aristotle to the disintegration of scholasticism: 1100–1600 (pp. 479–495). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koridze, G. (2006). Intentionale Grundlegung der philosophischen Logik: Studien zur Intentionalität des Denkens bei Hervaeus Natalis im Traktat ‘De secundis intentionibus. PhD Dissertation, University of Tubingen, at URL: http://w210.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/dbt/volltexte/2006/2264/pdf/Dissertation_Koridze.pdf

  • Lagerlund, H. (Ed.). (2007). Representation and objects of thought in medieval philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerlund, H. (2011). Mental representation in medieval philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/representation-medieval/

  • Lambertini, R. (1992). La teoria delle intentiones da Gentile da Cingoli a Matteo da Gubbio. Fonti e linee di tendenza. In D. Buzzetti, M. Ferriani, & A. Tabarroni (Eds.), L’insegnamento della logica a Bologna nel XIV secolo (pp. 277–351). Bologna: Istituto per la Storia dell’Università.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panaccio, C. (1999). Le Discours intérieur. De Platon à Guillaume d’Ockham. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panaccio, C. (2004). Ockham on concepts. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R. (1997). Theories of cognition in the later middle ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perler, D. (1994). What am I thinking about? Duns Scotus and Peter Aureol on intentional objects. Vivarium, 32, 72–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perler, D. (1995). Intentionale und reale existenz: eine spätmittelalterliche Kontroverse. Philosophisches Jahrbuch, 102, 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perler, D. (Ed.). (2001). Ancient and medieval theories of intentionality. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perler, D. (2002). Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perler, D. (2006). Intentionality and actions. Medieval discussions on the cognitive capacities of animals. In M. C. Pacheco & J. F. Meirinhos (Eds.), Intellect and imagination in medieval philosophy (pp. 72–98). Turnhout: Brepols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pini, G. (2002). Categories and logic in Duns Scotus. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachau, K. H. (1988). Vision and certitude in the age of Ockham: Optics, epistemology, and the foundations of semantics: 1250–1345. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachau, K. H. (1999). Some aspects of the notion of intentional existence at Paris, 1250–1320. In S. Ebbesen & R. L. Friedman (Eds.), Medieval analyses in language and cognition (pp. 331–353). Copenhagen: Reitzels.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Amerini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Amerini, F. (2018). Intentionality. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_245-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_245-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics