Abstract
Born, Poitiers after 1085; died, Poitiers 1154. According to Gilson, Gilbert was the greatest metaphysician of the twelfth century. He was a profound thinker, original and coherent, famous in his time for the complexity and boldness of his philosophical theology. He provoked both violent disapproval and great enthusiasm. Brought to trial for heresy in 1148, he came out of it without being condemned; rather, his thought had a considerable number of followers in the so-called Porretan School. Through his followers, he exercised a significant influence on the theology of the second half of the twelfth century. In his mature thinking, he went far beyond what he had learned during his apprenticeship: at Chartres, philosophy of a Platonic stamp based on the Timaeus and on the Consolation of Philosophy and Opuscula sacra of Boethius; at Laon, theology founded on Biblical exegesis and the Fathers. In his Commentary on Boethius’ Opuscula sacra, his fundamental work, he developed a profoundly innovative “rational” theology and an autonomous and broadly coherent philosophical reflection. It combines the Platonic doctrine of the preeminence of form with a keen sense of the primacy of the concrete and the singular. It consists of, principally, an ontology, a philosophy of language, and an epistemology, all closely interconnected. Only the principles (God, prime matter, ideas) are simple, and only in God is being everything that he is. Created entities, by contrast, receive their being from something other than themselves (from God), and they are composed of an ordered aggregation of forms. Forms are always inherent in a substrate. Common natures do not exist; everything, compounds and forms, is singular: the humanity of every man is similar to but different from that of any other man. But not everything that is singular is an individual – only concrete entities and the compounds of forms that constitute the complete form of every concrete entity are individuals: their individuality consists in the fact that, if they are considered as wholes, they are dissimilar from any other compound thing. Universals are collections of singular forms gathered together by the intellect on the basis of the resemblance that is found between the singular entities. When we speak about natural objects, a name signifies a concrete entity and one of its properties or forms; the subject of the proposition represents the concrete entity, and the predicate represents a form inherent in it. The language of the philosophy of nature reflects what it investigates: the compound constitution of creation. It lends its own terms and its own formal structures to the other two speculative sciences, mathematics and theology. The correct understanding of a text is attained when, by distinguishing the appropriate discipline to which it belongs, the interpreter gathers, beneath the surface of the words the “meaning in the author’s mind.”
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Authentic Works in Complete Editions. (1996). Commentaria in Boethii opuscula sacra. In N. M. Häring (Ed.), The commentaries on Boethius by Gilbert of Poitiers, Studies and texts 13. Toronto: PIMS. Some particularly important passages have been translated into English in de Rijk (1988–1989).
Secondary Sources
Catalani, L. (2009). I Porretani. Una scuola di pensiero, tra alto e basso medioevo. Nutrix 2. Turnhout: Brepols.
Colish, M. (1987). Gilbert, the early Porretans, and Peter Lombard: sematics and theology. In: J. Jolivet et A. de Libera (Eds.), Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains… (pp. 229–250).
de Rijk, L. M. (1987). Gilbert de Poitiers, ses vues sémantiques et métaphysiques. In: J. Jolivet & A. de Libera (Eds.), Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains… (pp 147–171).
de Rijk, L. M. (1988–1989). Semantics and metaphysics in Gilbert of Poitiers. A chapter of twelfth century Platonism. Vivarium 26, 73–113, 27:1–35.
Gauvin, J. (1987). Les sens de ‘nichil’ chez Gilbert de la Porrée. In: J. Jolivet et A. de Libera (Eds.). Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains... (pp. 173–181).
Gracia, J. E. (1988). Introduction to the problem of individuation in the early Middle Ages (2nd ed., pp. 155–178). München: Philosophia Verlag.
Gross-Diaz, T. (1996). The Psalms commentary of Gilbert of Poitiers: From Lectio Divina to the lecture room. Leiden: Brill.
Haas, M. (1987). Die Wissenchaftsklassifikation des Gilbert von Poitiers. In: J. Jolivet et A. de Libera (Eds.), Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains… (pp. 279–295).
Häring, N. M. (1957). Sprachlogik und philosophische Voraussetzungen zum Verständnis der Christologie Gilberts von Poitiers. Scholastik, 32, 373–398.
Kneepkens, C. H. (2000). Grammar and semantics in the twelfth century: Petrus Helias and Gilbert de la Porrée on the substantive verb. In M. Kardaun & Y. Spruyt (Eds.), The winged, pp 237–276 chariot: Collected essays on Plato and Platonism in honour of L. M. de Rijk (pp. 237–276). Leiden: Brill.
Jacobi, K. (1995a). Sprache und Wirklichkeit: Theorienbildung über Sprache im frühen 12. Jahrhundert. In S. Ebbesen (Ed.), Geschichte der Sprachteorie 3 Sprachtheorien in Spätantike und Mittelalter (pp. 77–108). Tübingen: Narr. (in part. 96–100).
Jacobi, K. (1995b). Natürliches Sprechen – Theoriesprache – Theologische Rede. Die Wissenshaftslehre des Gilbert von Poitiers. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, 49, 511–528.
Jacobi, K. (1996). Einzelnes – Individuum – Person. Gilbert von Poitiers’ Philosophie des Individuellen. In J. A. Aertsen & A. Speer (Eds.), Individuum und Individualität im Mittelalter (pp. 3–21). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Jacobi, K. (1998). Gilbert of Poitiers. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. IV, pp. 68–72). London: Routledge.
Jacobi, K. (2002). Philosophische und theologische Weisheit. Gilbert von Poitiers’ Interpretation der ‘Regeln’ des Boethius (De hebdomadibus). In R. Berndt, M. Lutz-Bachmann, & R. M. W. Stammberger (Eds.), “Scientia” und “Disciplina.” Wissenstheorie und Wissenschaftspraxis im 12. und 13. Jahrhundert (pp. 71–78). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Jolivet, J. (1987). Rhéthorique et théologie dans une page de Gilbert de Poitiers. In Jolivet & A. de Libera (Eds.), Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains…,183–198. Also in Id., Aspects de la pensée médiévale: Abélard. Doctrines du langage (pp. 293–310). Paris: Vrin.
Jolivet, J. (1990). Le jeu des sciences théorétiques selon Gilbert de Poitiers. In S. Knuuttila, R. Työrinoja, & S. Ebbesen (Eds.), Knowledge and the sciences in medieval philosophy. Proceedings of the eighth international congress of medieval philosophy (SIEPM) (Vol. II, pp. 71–88). Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
Jolivet, J. (1992a). La question de la matière chez Gilbert de Poitiers. In H. J. Westra (Ed.), From Athens to Chartres. Neoplatonism and medieval thought. Studies in honour of Edouard Jeauneau (pp. 247–257). Leiden: Brill.
Jolivet, J. (1992b). Trois versions médiévales sur l’universel et l’individu: Roscelin, Abélard, Gilbert de la Porrée. Rev Métaphys Morale, 97, 111–155.
Jolivet, J. (1998). Tournures et défaillances du dire. Trois textes du douzième siècle. In P. Legendre (Ed.), Du pouvoir de diviser les mots et les choses (pp. 57–69). Bruxelles: Maison des sciences de l’homme.
Jolivet, J., & A. de Libera (Eds.). (1987). Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains aux origines de laLogica modernorum, Actes du septième symposium européen d’histoire de la logique et de la sémantique médiévales, Poitiers 17–22 Juin 1985. Napoli: Bibliopolis.
Lewry, O. (1987). The Liber sex principiourm, a supposedly Porretanean work. A study in ascription. In: J. Jolivet & A. de Libera (Eds.), Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains… (pp. 251–278).
Knuuttila, S. (1987). Possibility and necessity in Gilbert of Poitiers. In: J. Jolivet & A. de Libera (Eds.). Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains… (pp. 199–218).
Knuuttila, S. (1993). Modalities in medieval philosophy (pp. 75–82). London: Routledge.
Maioli, B. (1974). Gli universali. Storia antologica del problema da Socrate al XII secolo (pp. 302–348). Roma: Bulzoni.
Maioli, B. (1979). Gilberto Porretano. Dalla grammatica speculativa alla metafisica del concreto. Roma: Bulzoni.
Marenbon, J. (1988). Gilbert of Poitiers. In P. Dronke (Ed.), A history of twelfth-century western philosophy (pp. 328–352). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marenbon, J. (1998). The twelfth century. In J. Marenbon (Ed.), Routledge history of philosophy (Vol. III, pp. 166–171). London: Routledge.
Marenbon, J. (2002). Gilbert of Poitiers and the Porretans on Mathematics in the division of the sciences. In: R. Berndt, M. Lutz-Bachmann, & R. M. W. Stammberger (Eds.), “Scientia” und “Disciplina.” Wissenstheorie und Wissenschaftspraxis im 12. und 13. Jahrhundert (pp. 37-69). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Marenbon, J. (2013). Gilbert of Poitiers’s contextual theory of meaning and the hermeneutics of secrecy. In J. L. Fink, H. Hansen, & A. M. Mora-Márquez (Eds.), Logic and language in the middle ages. A volume in honour of Sten Ebbesen (pp. 49–64). Leiden: Brill.
Nielsen, L. O. (1976). On the doctrine of logic and language of Gilbert Porreta and his followers. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Age grec et latin, 17, 40–69.
Nielsen, L. O. (1982). Theology and philosophy in the twelfth century. A study of Gilbert Porreta’s thinking and the theological expositions of the doctrine of the incarnation during the period 1130–1180. Leiden: Brill.
Pelster, F. (1949). Gilbert de la Porrée, Gilbertus Porretanus oder Gilbertus Porreta? Scholastik, 20–24, 401–403.
Schmidt, M. A. (1956). Gottheit und Trinität nach den Kommentaren des Gilberts Porreta zu Boethius, De trinitate. Basel: Verlag für Recht und Gesellschaft.
Spruyt, J. (2000). Gilbert of Poitiers on the application of language to the transcendent and sublunary domains. In M. Kardaun & J. Spruyt (Eds.), The winged chariot. Collected essays on Plato and Platonism in honour of L. M. de Rijk (pp. 205–236). Leiden: Brill.
Valente, L. (2004). Virtus significationis, violentia usus. Porretan views on theological hermeneutics. In A. Maierù & L. Valente (Eds.), Medieval theories on assertive and non-assertive language (pp. 163–184). Firenze: Olschki.
Valente, L. (2008a). Logique et théologie. Les écoles parisiennes entre 1150 et 1220. Paris: Vrin.
Valente, L. (2008b). Un realismo singolare: forme e universali in Gilberto di Poitiers e nella Scuola Porretana. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 19, 191–246.
Valente, L. (2011). ‘Praedicaturi supponimus’. Is Gilbert of Poitiers' approach to the problem of linguistic reference a pragmatic one? Vivarium 49 (= Marmo C [ed] Proceedings of the 18th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Sematics, Bologna, 8–11 June 2010):54–74.
Valente, L. (2013). Supposition theory and Porretan theology: Gilbert of Poitiers, Summa Zwettlensis and Dialogus Ratii et Everardi. Vivarium 51 (= Bos EP [ed] Rise and development of supposition theory. Acts of the 17th Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics. Brepols, Turnhout):119–144.
Valente, L. (2014). Forme, contesti e interpretazioni. La filosofia di Gilberto di Poitiers († 1154). Medioevo, 39, 90–134.
Van Elswijk, H. C. (1966). Gilbert Porreta. Sa vie, son euvre, sa pansée. Leuven: Université catholique de Louvain.
Vanni-Rovighi, S. (1956). La filosofia di Gilberto Porretano. In: Miscellanea del Centro di Studi Medievali LVIII (pp 1–64) (repr. in Ead., Studi di filosofia medioevale I, Vita e pensiero, Milano 1978).
Williams, M. E. (1951). The teaching of Gilbert Porreta on the trinity as found in his commentaries on Boethius. Roma: Università Gregoriana.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Valente, L. (2018). Gilbert of Poitiers. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_190-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_190-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities