Access to and Widening Participation in Higher Education

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_47-1

Widening Access and participation (WP) has emerged as a major policy concern in a number of national contexts. It is connected to longer histories over struggles for the right to higher education, to concerns for greater fairness in society, and to ensuring that higher education is more equitable and inclusive. It is also shaped by the growing diversification of student constituencies that have resulted from higher education expansion over the later decades of the twentieth century. In the English context, during the period of the New Labour Government (1997–2010), widening participation, often shorthanded as “WP,” gained discursive hegemony, and this discourse has gained momentum internationally. However, the concept of “widening participation” is highly contested within and across different national contexts, and there is no one agreed definition.

The different meanings circulating from policies of WP are often implicit, while assumptions are often made about a common or universal...

Keywords

High Education High Education System Widening Participation Fair Access High Education Expansion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Appadurai, A. 2004. The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. In Culture and public action, ed. V. Rao and M. Walton, 59–84. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, L. 2003. Race, masculinity and schooling: Muslim boys and education. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, L., M. Hutchings, C. Leathwood, and A. Ross. 2003. Widening participation in higher education: Implications for policy and practice. In Higher education and social class: Issues of exclusion and inclusion, ed. L. Archer, M. Hutchings, and A. Ross. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S.J., and C. Vincent. 1998. ‘I Heard It on the Grapevine’: ‘Hot’ knowledge and school choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education 19(3): 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball, S.J., R. Bowe, and S. Gewirtz. 1995. Circuits of schooling: A sociological exploration of parental choice of school in social class contexts. Sociology Review 43: 52–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, P. 2011. Discussions across difference: Addressing the affective dimensions of teaching diverse students about diversity. Teaching in Higher Education 16(6): 669–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barr, J. 2008. The stranger within: On the idea of an educated public. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Birmingham, S. 2015. Speech: Times higher education world academic summit. Retrieved from http://www.senatorbirmingham.com.au/Media-Centre/Speeches/ID/2850/Speech-Times-Higher-Education-World- Academic-Summit.
  9. Brah, A. 1996. Cartographophies of diaspora: Contesting identities. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Burke, P.J. 2002. Accessing education effectively widening participation. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  11. Burke, P.J. 2012. The right to higher education: Beyond widening participation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Burke, P.J. 2015. Re/imagining higher education pedagogies: Gender, emotion and difference. Teaching in Higher Education 20(4): 388–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burke, P.J., and J. McManus. 2009. Art for a few: Exclusion and misrecognition in art and design higher education admissions. London: National Arts Learning Network.Google Scholar
  14. Burke, P.J., G. Crozier, and L. Misiaszek. 2016. Changing pedagogical spaces in higher education: Diversity, inequalities and misrecognition. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Chawla, D., and A. Rodriguez. 2007. New imaginations of difference: On teaching, writing, and culturing. Teaching in Higher Education 12(5): 697–708. doi:10.1080/13562510701596265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Connolly, P., and J. Neill. 2001. Constructions of locality and gender and their impact on the educational aspirations of working-class children. International Studies in Sociology of Education 11(2): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraser, N. 1997. Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ condition. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Gale, T. and S. Parker. 2013. Widening participation in Australian higher education. Report submitted to the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) and the Office for Fair Access (OFFA), EnglandGoogle Scholar
  19. Gewirtz, S., S.J. Ball, and R. Bowe. 1995. Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hockings, C., S. Cooke, M. Bowl, H. Yamashita, and S. McGinty. 2008. Learning and teaching for diversity and difference in higher education: Towards more inclusive learning environments, Teaching and learning research briefing 41. London: Teaching and Learning Research Programme, ESRC.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, R., and L. Thomas. 2005. The 2003 UK government higher education white paper: A critical assessment of its implications for the access and widening participation agenda. Journal of Education Policy 20(5): 615–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kettley, N. 2007. The past, present and future of widening participation research. British Journal of Sociology of Education 28(3): 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lazerson, M. 2010. Higher education and the American dream: Success and its discontents. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Leathwood, C., and B. Read. 2009. Gender and the changing face of higher education: A feminized future? Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Leyva, Rodolfo. 2009. No child left behind: A neoliberal repackaging of social darwinism. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 17(1): 364–381, June.Google Scholar
  26. Maher, F., and M. Tetrault. 2006. Privilege and diversity in the academy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Morley, L. 1999. Organising feminisms: The micropolitics of the academy. Hampshire: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morley, L. 2003. Quality and power in higher education. Berkshire and Philadelphia: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Morley, L., and R. Lugg. 2009. Mapping meritocracy: Intersecting gender, poverty and higher educational opportunity structures. Higher Education Policy 22: 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nixon, J. 2013. The drift to conformity: The myth of institutional diversity. In Global university rankings: Challenges for European higher education, ed. Tero Erkkilä, 92–108. London and New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reay, D., and S.J. Ball. 1997. “Spoilt for Choice”: The working classes and educational markets. Oxford Review of Education 23(1): 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reay, D., J. Davies, M. David, and S.J. Ball. 2001. Choices of degree or degrees of choice? Class, “Race” and the higher education choice process. Sociology 35(4): 855–974.Google Scholar
  33. Robbins, L. 1963. Higher education: A report. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  34. Rostan, M., and M. Vaira. 2011. Questioning excellence in higher education: an introduction. In Questioning excellence in higher education: Policies, experiences and challenges in national and comparative perspective, ed. M. Rostan and M. Vaira, vii–xvii. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwartz, S. 2004. Fair admissions to higher education: Recommendations for good practice. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  36. Sellar, S., and T. Gale. 2011. Mobility, aspiration, voice: A new structure of feeling for student equity in higher education. Critical Studies in Education 52(2): 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Slack, K. 2003. Whose aspirations are they anyway? International Journal of Inclusive Education 7(4): 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stevenson, J., P.J. Burke, and P. Whelan. 2014. Pedagogic stratification and the shifting landscape of higher education. York: Higher Education Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/Research/PedagogicStratification
  39. Stromquist, N. 2012. Theory and ideology in the gender proposals of the world bank’s education strategy 2020. In: Christopher S. Collins and Alexander W. Wiseman (ed.) Education Strategy in the Developing World: Revising the World Bank’s Education Policy (International Perspectives on Education and Society) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 16:133–149.Google Scholar
  40. Thompson, J. 2000. Introduction. In Stretching the academy: The politics and practice of widening participation in higher education, ed. J. Thompson. NIACE: Leicester.Google Scholar
  41. Whitty, G, A. Hayton and S. Tang. 2016 The growth of participation in higher education in England. In Widening participation in higher education: International perspectives. occasional papers, Issue 1, May 2016. Special Issue co-published with the Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University. Newcastle: Centre of Excellence for Equity in Higher Education.Google Scholar
  42. Young, M. 1961. The rise of the meritocracy 1870–2033: An essay on education and equality. London: Pelican Books.Google Scholar
  43. Zha, X., and S. Ding. 2007. Can low tuition fee policy improve higher education equity and social welfare? Frontiers of Education in China 2(2): 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Excellence for Equity in Higher EducationThe University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia