Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Romania

  • Adrian Miroiu
  • Lazăr Vlăsceanu
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_435-1

Historical Preliminaries

Romanian higher education emerged as a modern system in the first half of the twentieth century. The premodern institutions of higher learning (e.g., Major Jesuit College in Cluj established in 1582, Vasilian College/Colegiul Vasilian in Iassy established in 1634, Princely Academy/Academia Domnească of Bucharest established in 1694, Princely Academy/Academia Domnească of Iassy established in 1707, Michael Academy/Academia Mihaileană of Iassy established in 1834) were mostly connected to the feudal rulers of the time and to the orthodox or catholic church philosophy and religion. The Union of the Romanian Principalities (1859) into the new nation-state of Romania brought with it the reorganization of former institutions of higher learning as modern universities, particularly the University of Iassy (1862) and the University of Bucharest (1864). Meanwhile in Transylvania (which at that time was part of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire), the first modern universities...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Gogu, Emilia, Mihaela Mureșan, and Marinella S. Turdean. 2015. Analiza statistică a evoluției absolvenților de liceu în România, în perioada 2000–2014. Revista pentru Asigurarea Calității în Învățământul superior 6 (1): 35–44.Google Scholar
  2. Hatos, Adrian. 2013. Access to higher education. A Review of the literature with a focus on Central and Eastern Europe. Sociologie Românească 2: 61–75.Google Scholar
  3. Miroiu, Adrian, and Lazăr Vlăsceanu. 2012. Relating quality and funding: The Romanian case. In European higher education at the crossroads: Between the Bologna Process and National Reforms, ed. Adrian Curaj et al., 791–807. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Nicolescu, Luminița, and Cristian Păun. 2009. Relating higher education with the labor market – Graduates’ Expectations and employers’ requirements. Tertiary Education and Management 15 (1): 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Păunescu, Mihai, Lazăr Vlăsceanu, and Adrian Miroiu. 2011. Calitatea învățământului superior din România: o analiză instituțională a tendințelor actuale. Iași: Polirom.Google Scholar
  6. Reisz, Robert D. 2007. Legitimacy discourse and mission statements of private higher education institutions in Romania. In Private higher education in post-communist Europe. In search of legitimacy, ed. S. Slantcheva and Daniel C. Levy, 135–155. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Romanian Institute of Statistics. Baza de date TEMPO. https://statistici.insse.ro/shop/. Accessed July 2017.
  8. Vîiu, Gabriel, Mihai Păunescu, and Adrian Miroiu. 2016. Research-driven classification and ranking in higher education. An empirical appraisal of a Romanian policy experience. Scientometrics 107 (2): 785–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vlăsceanu, Lazăr. 2010. Universities and reflexive modernity: institutional ambiguities and unintended consequences. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceNational University of Political Studies and Public AdministrationBucharestRomania
  2. 2.University of BucharestBucharestRomania