Synonyms
Definition
The capacity of an actor to define or influence issues on the public agenda by selecting issues seen as important or relevant or by shaping the way these issues are framed, discussed, and interpreted.
Introduction
Agenda setting is one of the key concepts in the critical or interpretative approaches in the study of policy development. Developed in response to positivist paradigms, which saw policies as largely technical solutions to objectively existing problems, critical or interpretive analysis emphasizes the constructed, contingent, and processual nature of policies, in particular the role of differently positioned actors in bringing specific issues to the fore (Fischer 2003). In this sense, the use of agenda setting in the research on higher education policy is fundamentally related to the questions of political power and influence and thus to the relationship between longer-term structural change...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bacevic, Jana. 2017. University under attack? Politics, contestation and agency beyond the neoliberal university. In The global university, ed. R. Barnett and M. Peters. New York: Peter Lang.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Brian D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and instability in American politics. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.
Cohen, Michael, James March, and Johan Olsen. 1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 1–25.
Corbett, Anne. 2011. Ping pong: Competing leadership for reform in EU higher education 1998–2006. European Journal of Education 46 (1): 36–53.
Cronin, Ciaran. 1996. Bourdieu and Foucault on power and modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (6): 55–85.
Dunlop, Clare. 2016. Knowledge, epistemic communities, and agenda setting. In Handbook of public policy agenda setting, ed. N. Zahariadis, 273–294. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flaxman, Seth, Sharad Goel, and Justin Rao. 2016. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly 80: 298–320.
Foucault, Michel. 2000. Power. New York: Vintage.
Hay, Colin. 2002. Political analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jann, Werner, and Kai Wegrich. 2007. Theories of the policy cycle. In Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods, ed. F. Fischer, G.J. Miller, and M.S. Sidney, 43–62. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis.
Kingdon, James. 2014. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd ed. Pierson New International Edition. Harlow: Pierson Education Limited.
Lukes, Stephen. 2005. Power: A radical view. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Marginson, Simon, and Gary Rhoades. 2002. Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education 43 (3): 281–309.
McCombs, Maxwell, and David L. Shaw. 1972. The agenda-setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2): 176–187.
McCombs, Maxwell, Donald Shaw, and David Weaver. 2014. New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication and Society 17 (6): 781–802.
McLendon, Michael K. 2003. State governance and reform of higher education: Patterns, trends, and theories of the public policy process. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, ed. J.C. Smart, 57–144. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Mills, Michael R. 2007. Stories of politics and policy: Florida’s higher education governance reorganization. The Journal of Higher Education 78 (2): 162–187.
Nokkala, Terhi, and Jana Bacevic. 2014. University autonomy, agenda setting and the construction of agency: The case of the European University Association in the European Higher Education Area. European Educational Research Journal 13 (6): 699–714.
Robertson, Susan L., and Roger Dale. 2015. Towards a ‘critical cultural political economy’ account of the globalising of education. Globalisation, Education, Societies 13 (1): 149–170.
Robertson, Susan L., and Janja Komljenovic. 2016. Non-state actors, and the advance of frontier higher education markets in the global south. Oxford Review of Education 42 (4): 594–611.
Sell, Susan K., and Aseem Prakash. 2004. Using ideas strategically: The contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights. International Studies Quarterly 48 (1): 143–175.
Smith, Karen. 2013. Critical discourse analysis and higher education research. In Theory and method in higher education research, ed. Jeroen Huisman and Malcolm Tight, 61–79. Buckingham: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Sum, Ngai-Ling, and Bob Jessop. 2013. Towards a cultural political economy: Putting culture in its place in political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Wodak, Ruth, and Norman Fairclough. 2010. Recontextualizing European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies 7 (1): 19–40.
Yagci, Yasemin. 2014. Setting policy agenda for the social dimension of the Bologna process. Higher Education Policy 27 (4): 509–528.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bacevic, J., Nokkala, T. (2018). Agenda Setting and Policy Development, Higher Education. In: Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_137-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_137-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9553-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9553-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education