Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Humanoid Robotics: A Reference pp 1–20Cite as

A Comparative Study Between Humans and Humanoid Robots

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

Humanoid robots are usually designed with the goal to realize humanlike topology, structure, and physical properties, as it would allow the robots to work in existing infrastructure built for humans. For example, most humanoid robots have two arms and/or two legs, and each leg typically consists of a three-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) hip, a one-DOF knee, and two- or three-DOF ankle joints, similar to the human leg structure. Many humanoid robots have been successful in emulating the human body at least at a higher level. However, there are many important differences between existing humanoid robot hardware and the human body. For example, it is often impossible to physically implement the same kinematic properties such as number of joints and range of motion using commonly available materials and components. Actuators are also very different because none of the existing man-made actuators can match the power density of human muscles. Although understanding human motor control has seen a lot of progress and inspired some robot controllers lately, there are still significant differences in their complexity and performance. These differences between the human body and humanoid robots have significant impact on the physical capability of current humanoid robot hardware. Studying them may therefore give insights on how humanoid robotics researchers can improve the agility and versatility of humanoid robots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Y. Nakamura, K. Yamane, Y. Fujita, I. Suzuki, Somatosensory computation for man-machine interface from motion capture data and musculoskeletal human model. IEEE Trans. Robot. 21(1), 58–66 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Kaneko, F. Kanehiro, S. Kajita, H. Hirukawa, T. Kawasaki, M. Hirata, K. Akachi, M. Isozumi, Humanoid Robot HRP-2, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004, pp. 1083–1090

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.A. Bhounsule, K. Yamane, Iterative learning control for accurate task-space tracking with humanoid robots, in International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2015, pp. 490–496

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Kurz, Stretching Scientifically: A Guide to Flexibility Training (Stadion, Island Pond, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Nishiwaki, T. Sugihara, S. Kagami, F. Kanehiro, M. Inaba, H. Inoue, Design and development of research platform for perception-action integration, in humanoid robot: H6, in Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2000, pp. 1559–1564

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Gouaillier, P. Hugel, V. Blazevic, C. Kilner, J. Monceaux, P. Lafourcade, B. Marnier, J. Serre, B. Maisonnier, Mechatronic design of NAO humanoid, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009, pp. 769–774

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Ogura, K. Aikawa, K. Shimomura, H. Kondo, A. Morishima, H. Lim, A. Takanishi, Development of a new humanoid robot WABIAN-2, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006, pp. 76–81

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Englsberger, A. Werner, C. Ott, B. Henze, M. Roa, G. Garofalo, R. Burger, A. Beyer, O. Eiberger, K. Schmid, A. Albu-Schäffer, Overview of the torque-controlled humanoid robot TORO, in Proceedings of IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2014, pp. 916–923

    Google Scholar 

  9. I.W. Park, J.Y. Kim, J. Lee, J.H. Oh, Mechanical design of the humanoid robot platform, HUBO. Adv. Robot. 21(11), 1305–1322 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H.F. Schulte, The characteristics of the McKibben artificial muscle. Appl. External Power Prosthet. Orthotics 874, 94–115 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.S. Haines et al., Artificial muscles from fishing line and sewing thread. Science 343, 868–872 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Yip, G. Niemeyer, High-performance robotic muscles from conductive nylon sewing thread, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2015, pp. 2313–2318

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.H. Warfel, The Extremities: Muscles and Motor Points (Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.H. Warfel, The Head, Neck, and Trunk (Lea & Febiger, Phiradelphia, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Nakanishi, Y. Asano, T. Kozuki, H. Mizoguchi, Y. Motegi, M. Osada, T. Shirai, J. Urata, K. Okada, M Inaba, Design concept of detail musculoskeletal humanoid “Kenshiro” – toward a real human body musculoskeletal simulator, in Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2012, pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Rasmussen, M. Damsgaard, M. Voigt, Muscle recruitment by the min/max criterion – a comparative study. J. Biomech. 34(3), 409–415 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Yamane, Y. Fujita, Y. Nakamura, Estimation of physically and physiologically valid somatosensory information, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, 2005, pp. 2635–2641

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.V. Hill, The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle, B126, 136–195 (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Stroeve, Impedance characteristics of a neuro-musculoskeletal model of the human arm I: posture control. J. Biol. Cybern. 81, 475–494 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Tonietti, R. Schiavi, A. Bicchi, Design and control of a variable stiffness actuator for safe and fast physical human/robot interaction, in Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2005, pp. 526–531

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Wolf, G. Hirzinger, A new variable stiffness design: matching requirements of the next robot generation, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2008, pp. 1741–1746

    Google Scholar 

  22. N.G. Tsagarakis, I. Sardellitti, D.G. Caldwell, A new variable stiffness actuator (CompAct-VSA): design and modelling, in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2011, pp. 378–383

    Google Scholar 

  23. S.K. Au, H.M. Herr, Powered ankle-foot prosthesis. Robot. Autom. Mag. IEEE 15(3), 52–59 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M.B. Wiggin, G.S. Sawicki, S.H. Collins, An exoskeleton using controlled energy storage and release to aid ankle propulsion, in IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2011, pp. 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  25. C.S. Sherrington, The Integrative Action of the Nervous System (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1906)

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Murai, K. Yamane, A neuromuscular locomotion controller that realizes human-like responses to unexpected disturbances, in Proceedings of the 33th IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA2011), 2011, pp. 1997–2002

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Murai, K Yamane, Y. Nakamura, Effects of nerve signal transmission delay in somatosensory reflex modeling based on inverse dynamics and optimization, in Proceedings of the 32th IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA2010), 2010, pp. 5076–5083

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Prochazka, M. Gorassini, Models of ensemble firing of muscle spindle afferents recorded during normal locomotion in cats. J. Physiol. 507, 277–291 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M.P. Mileusnic, G.E. Loeb, Mathematical models of proprioceptors. II. Structure and function of the golgi tendon organ. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 1789–1802 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. C.D. Clemente, Gray’s Anatomy ed 30 (Lea & Febiger, Phyladellphia, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  31. A.M.R. Agur, Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy (Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  32. A.E. Bryson, Y.-C. Ho, Applied Optimal Control (Blaisdell, New York, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  33. G. Rizzolatti, L. Craighero, The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 169–192 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. P.A. Guertin, The mammalian central pattern generator for locomotion. Brain Res. Rev. 62, 54–56 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. P.A. Guertin, Central pattern generator for locomotion: anatomical, physiological, and pathophysiological considerations. Front. Neurol. 3, Article 183 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. F.C. Anderson, M.G. Pandy, Dynamic optimization of human walking. J. Biomech. Eng. 123, 381–390 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J.M. Wang, S.R. Hamner, S.L. Delp, V. Koltun, Optimizing locomotion controllers using biologically-based actuators and objectives. ACM Trans. Robot. 31(4), Article 25 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  38. K. Yamane, Y. Nakamura, Dynamics filter – concept and implementation of on-line motion generator for human figures. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 19(3), 421–432 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. K. Miura, M. Morisawa, S. Nakaoka, F. Kanehiro, K. Harada, K. Kaneko, S. Kajia, Robot motion remix based on motion capture data – towards human-like locomotion of humanoid robots, in Proceedings of IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2009, pp. 596–603

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. Vukobratovic, B. Borovac, Zero-moment point – thirty five years of its life. Int. J. Humanoid Robot. 1(1), 157–173 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Q.C. Pham, Y. Nakamura, Time-optimal path parameterization for critically dynamic motions of humanoid robots, in Proceedings of IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2012, pp. 165–170

    Google Scholar 

  42. Y. Zheng, K. Yamane, Adapting human motions to humanoid robots through time warping based on a general motion feasibility index, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2015, pp. 6281–6288

    Google Scholar 

  43. K. Mombaur, A. Truong, J-P. Laumond, From human to humanoid locomotion – an inverse optimal control approach. Auton. Robot. 28(3), 369–383 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. B.D. Argall, S. Chernova, M. Veloso, B. Browning, A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Robot. Auton. Syst. 57(5), 469–483 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. T. Inamura, I. Toshima, H. Tanie, Y. Nakamura, Embodied symbol emergence based on mimesis theory. Int. J. Robot. Res. 23(4), 363–377 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. A.J. Ijspeert, J. Nakanishi, H. Hoffmann, P. Pastor, S. Schaal, Dynamical movement primitives: learning attractor models for motor behaviors. Neural Comput. 25(2), 328–373 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. S. Calinon, A. Billard, Learning of gestures by imitation in a humanoid robot, in Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007), pp. 153–177

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. H. Geyer, H. Herr, A muscle-reflex model that encodes principles of legged mechanics produces human walking dynamics and muscle activities. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 18(3), 263–273 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. G. Taga, Y. Yamaguchi, H. Shimizu, Self-organized control of bipedal locomotion by neural oscillators in unpredictable environment. Biol. Cybern. 65, 147–159 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. A.J. Ijspeert, Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots: a review. Neural Netw. 21, 642–653 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Disney Research, 15213, 4720 Forbes Avenue, Lower Level, Suite 110, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Katsu Yamane

  2. Digital Human Research Group, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tokyo, Japan

    Akihiko Murai

Authors
  1. Katsu Yamane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Akihiko Murai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsu Yamane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Intuitive Surgical , Sunnyvale, California, USA

    Ambarish Goswami

  2. Singapore, Singapur, Singapore

    Prahlad Vadakkepat

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Yamane, K., Murai, A. (2018). A Comparative Study Between Humans and Humanoid Robots. In: Goswami, A., Vadakkepat, P. (eds) Humanoid Robotics: A Reference. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7194-9_7-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7194-9_7-1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7194-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7194-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation