Skip to main content

Design for the Value of Inclusiveness

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design

Abstract

There is an increasing awareness that many everyday products and services present challenges and difficulties to potential users. These difficulties may arise because the products and services have not been designed to allow for the full range of functional capabilities of the users who wish to use them. Medical conditions, accidents, ageing, or genetic predisposition means that most people will at some point experience functional impairments that make everyday products and services difficult to use. This chapter aims to introduce readers to the needs of the full range of users and provide an introduction to how they can develop more inclusive products and services. It addresses the principal approaches and tools to designing for inclusivity as well as the underlying rationale for why companies and designers need to consider this important set of users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACSO (2007) American Community Survey 2004 subject definitions. American Community Survey Office, US Census Bureau

    Google Scholar 

  • ADA (1990) Americans with Disabilities Act (US Public Law 101-336)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benktzon M (1993) Designing for our future selves: the Swedish experience. Appl Ergon 24(1):19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer H, Holtzblatt K (1998) Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas P, Robinson P (2008) Automatic evaluation of assistive interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM international conference on intelligent user interfaces, pp 247–256

    Google Scholar 

  • BSI (2005) BS 7000-6:2005 design management systems. Managing inclusive design. Guide. British Standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1983) The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassim J (2004) Cross-market product and service innovation – the DBA challenge example. In: Keates S et al (eds) Designing a more inclusive world. Springer, London, pp 11–19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • CHRA (1985) Canadian Human Rights Act (R.S. 1985, c. H-6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW (2009) Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet 374(9696):1196–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson PJ, Keates S (2002) Quantifying design exclusion. In: Keates S, Clarkson PJ, Langdon PM, Robinson P (eds) Universal access and assistive technology. Springer, London, pp 23–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper A (1999) The inmates are running the asylum. SAMS Publishing, Indianapolis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DDA (1992) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Australia)

    Google Scholar 

  • DDA (1995) Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (c. 50)

    Google Scholar 

  • DTI (2000) A study on the difficulties disabled people have when using everyday consumer products. Government Consumer Safety Research, Department of Trade and Industry, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandson RF (2008) Universal and accessible design for products, services, and processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Follette Story M (2001) The principles of universal design. In: Preiser W, Ostroff E (eds) Universal design handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy E, Ahlburg D, Ali M, Breeze E, Sloggett A (1999) Disability in Great Britain: results from the 1996/7 disability follow-up to the Family Resources Survey. Charlesworth Group, Huddersfield

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2010) ISO 9241–210:2010 Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems. International Standards Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Keates S (2007) Designing for accessibility: a business guide to countering design exclusion. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Keates S, Clarkson PJ (2003) Countering design exclusion: an introduction to inclusive design. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keates S, Langdon P, Clarkson PJ, Robinson P (2002) User models and user physical capability. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (UMUAI). Wolters Kluwer 12(2–3):139–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Keates S, Adams R, Bodine C, Czaja S, Gordon W, Gregor P, Hacker E, Hanson V, Kemp J, Laff M, Lewis C, Pieper M, Richards J, Rose D, Savidis A, Schultz G, Snayd P, Trewin S, Varker P (2007) Cognitive and learning difficulties and how they affect access to IT systems. Int J Univers Access Inf Soc, Springer 5(4):329–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looms PO (2011) Making television accessible. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J (1993) Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman D (1988) The design of everyday things. The MIT Press, London/Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS (2011) People with disabilities in the labour market, 2011. Office for National Statistics, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS (2013) Internet access quarterly update, Q1 2013. Office for National Statistics, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sec508 (1998) Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. ‘794 d), as amended by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (US Public Law 105–220), 7 Aug 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman B, Plaisant C (2010) Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction, 5th edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2001) World population ageing: 1950–2050. Population Division. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2013) Disabilities. World Health Organization. Available at http://www.who.int/topics/disabilities/en/. Accessed 10 July 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simeon Keates .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Keates, S. (2015). Design for the Value of Inclusiveness . In: van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., van de Poel, I. (eds) Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6969-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6970-0

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics