Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Mortimer Sellers, Stephan Kirste

Deconstructionism

  • Johan van der Walt
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_75-2

Introduction

Deconstruction is a mode of philosophical thinking with which the French philosopher Jacques Derrida broke away from the traditional and dominant ways in which texts have been read and understood in the history or Western civilisation. Instead of focusing on the “ideal content” of meaning that texts evidently aim to convey and instead of engaging with in a debate with the author regarding this “ideal content” of the text, Derrida focused on the way in which the “material” organization of texts complicates, relatives, destabilizes, and even renders contradictory their ideal content or meaning.

What was Derrida’s aim with this new approach to reading and understanding texts? The brief description of Derridean deconstruction and its reception in legal theory that follows responds to this question in four steps. The first section, “Key Themes of Derridean Deconstruction,” briefly explains a number of the key concepts that Derrida developed in his early work. The second...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Balkin JM (1987) Deconstructive practice and legal theory. Yale Law J 96:743–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balkin JM (1990) Tradition, betrayal, and the politics of deconstruction. Cardozo Law Rev 11:1613–1630Google Scholar
  3. Derrida J (1967) De la Grammatologie. Éditions de Minuit, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Derrida J (1972) Marges de la Philosophie. Les Éditions de Minuit, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Derrida J (1974) Of grammatology. John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  6. Derrida J (1981) Positions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Derrida J (1982) Margins of philosophy. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Derrida J (1987) De l’esprit. Galilée, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Derrida J (1990) Force de Loi: Le ‘Fondament Mystique de L’Autorité’. Cardozo Law Rev 11:919–1045Google Scholar
  10. Derrida J (1993) Spectres de Marx. Éditions Galilée, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Derrida J (1994a) Force de Loi: Le ‘Fondament Mystique de L’Autorité. Galilée, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Derrida J (1994b) The deconstruction of actuality. Interview with passages, translated and reprinted in Radical Philosophy, Autumn 1994: 28–41Google Scholar
  13. Derrida J (1994c) Specters of Marx. Routledge, New York/LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Derrida J (1997) The politics of friendship. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Derrida J (2000) Of hospitality. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Derrida J (2002) Fichus. Galilée, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. Derrida J (2003a) On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Derrida J (2003b) Voyous. Galilée, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Foucault M (1972) Histoire de la Folie à l’âge classique. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. MacCormick N (1990) Reconstruction after deconstruction. Oxf J Leg Stud 10:539–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Norris C (1988) Law, deconstruction, and the resistance to theory. J Law Soc 15:166–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schlag P (1990) ‘Le hors de text, c’est moi’ the politics of form and the domestication of deconstruction. Cardozo Law Rev 11:1631–1674Google Scholar
  23. Supiot A (2010) L’esprit de Philadelphie. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Van der Walt J (2014) Law, utopia, event: a constellation of two trajectories. In: Sarat A et al (eds) Law and the utopian imagination. Stanford University Press, Standford, pp 60–100Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LuxembourgLuxembourg CityLuxembourg

Section editors and affiliations

  • Patricia Mindus
    • 1
  • Sebastian Andres Reyes Molina
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden