Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Mortimer Sellers, Stephan Kirste

American Realism - Development and Critique

  • Matthew X. Etchemendy
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_336-2

Introduction

The label “American Legal Realism” stands not for a discrete doctrine or single idea but for a movement in American legal thought that flourished in the interwar years and for the general “approach to law, adjudication, and legal education” associated with it (Fisher et al. 1993, xi). American Legal Realist thought has many aspects, but among the most distinctive and influential of these is the Realist perspective on the study of law and in particular the question of what should (and what should not) be the principal object and methods of a science of law. The present entry deals with this aspect of American Legal Realism.

The American Legal Realists of the 1920s and 1930s were a diverse group with a range of scholarly outlooks and interests (Kronman 1993, 185–186). In fact, there is not even a canonical, exhaustive list of Realists. (The figures cited herein as American Realists – Felix Cohen, Walter Wheeler Cook, Jerome Frank, Leon Green, Joseph Hutcheson, Karl...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Beale JH (1916) A treatise on the conflict of laws, vol 1, pt 1. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen MR (1931) Justice Holmes and the nature of law. Colum L Rev 31:352–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen FS (1933) Ethical systems and legal ideals. Falcon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen FS (1934) Modern ethics and the law. Brook L Rev 4:33–50Google Scholar
  5. Cohen FS (1935) Transcendental nonsense and the functional approach. Colum L Rev 35:809–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook WW (1924) The logical and legal bases of the conflict of laws. Yale L J 33:457–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook WW (1927) Scientific method and the law. A.B.A. J 13:303–309Google Scholar
  8. Cook WW (1931) Law and the modern mind: a symposium (part III, legal logic). Colum L Rev 31:108–115Google Scholar
  9. Dickinson J (1931) Legal rules: their function in the process of decision. U Pa L Rev 79:833–868Google Scholar
  10. Fisher WW, Horwitz MJ, Reed TA (eds) (1993) American legal realism. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank J (1930) Law and the modern mind. Brentano’s, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Frank J (1931) Are judges human?, pt 1. U Pa L Rev 80:17–53Google Scholar
  13. Frank J (1932) What courts do in fact, pt 1. Ill L Rev 26:645–666Google Scholar
  14. Fried BH (1998) The progressive assault on laissez faire. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Green L (1928) The duty problem in negligence cases. Colum L Rev 28:1014–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grey TC (1983) Langdell’s orthodoxy. U Pitt L Rev 45:1–53Google Scholar
  17. Grey TC (1996) Modern American legal thought. Review of Duxbury N (1995) patterns of American jurisprudence. Yale L J 106:493–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hart HLA (1959) Scandinavian realism. Camb L J 1959:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holmes OW (1897) The path of the law. Harv L Rev 10:457–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hutcheson JC (1929) The judgment intuitive: the function of the “hunch” in judicial decision. Cornell L Q 14:274–288Google Scholar
  21. Kim J (2005) Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  22. Kimball BA (2004) The Langdell problem: historicizing the century of historiography, 1906–2000s. Law Hist Rev 22:277–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kimball BA (2009) The inception of modern professional education: C. C. Langdell, 1826–1906. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel HillCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kronman AT (1993) The lost lawyer. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Langdell CC (1879) A selection of cases on the law of contracts, 2nd edn. Little, Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  26. Langdell CC (1880) A summary of the law of contracts, 2nd edn. Little, Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  27. Langdell CC (1887) Harvard celebration speeches: Professor Langdell. L Q Rev 3:123–125Google Scholar
  28. Leiter B (2007) Naturalizing jurisprudence. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Llewellyn KN (1930a) The bramble bush. Columbia University School of Law, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Llewellyn KN (1930b) A realistic jurisprudence – the next step. Colum L Rev 30:431–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Llewellyn KN (1931a) Legal tradition and social science method – a realist’s critique. In: Essays on research in the social sciences. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, pp 89–120Google Scholar
  32. Llewellyn KN (1931b) Some realism about realism – responding to dean pound. Harv L Rev 44:1222–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Llewellyn KN (1950) Remarks on the theory of appellate decision and the rules or canons about how statutes are to be construed. Vand L Rev 3:395–406Google Scholar
  34. Miles TJ, Sunstein CR (2008) The new legal realism. U Chi L Rev 75:831–851Google Scholar
  35. Moore U, Hope TS (1929) An institutional approach to the law of commercial banking. Yale L J 38:703–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oliphant H (1928) A return to stare decisis. A.B.A. J 14:71–76, 107, 159–162Google Scholar
  37. Oliphant H, Hewitt A (1929) Introduction. In: Rueff J, From the physical to the social sciences (trans: Green H). Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, pp ix–xxxiiGoogle Scholar
  38. Posner RA (1995) Overcoming law. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Purcell EA (1973) The crisis of democratic theory. University Press of Kentucky, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. Radin M (1925) The theory of judicial decision: or how judges think. A.B.A. J 11:357–362Google Scholar
  41. Radin M (1930) Statutory interpretation. Harv L Rev 43:863–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schauer F (2013) Legal realism untamed. Tex L Rev 91:749–780Google Scholar
  43. Sebok AJ (1995) Misunderstanding positivism. Mich L Rev 93:2054–2132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ursin E (2012) The missing normative dimension in Brian Leiter’s “reconstructed” legal realism. San Diego L Rev 49:1–35Google Scholar
  45. Wambaugh E (1906) Professor Langdell – a view of his career. Harv L Rev 20:1–4Google Scholar
  46. Yntema HE (1928) The hornbook method and the conflict of laws. Yale L J 37:468–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Chicago Law SchoolChicagoUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Pierluigi Chiassoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Università degli Studi di GenovaGenovaItaly