Introduction
The fact that farmers in the poorest countries have very little benefited from the recent price spikes in agricultural commodities is one of the greatest paradoxes of the last few years. Furthermore, in these same countries, city dwellers have suffered just as much from price increases without being better fed by local production. This is why, according to the FAO, the small decrease in the number of malnourished people suddenly stopped in 2007–2008. The reasons explaining this paradox are well established: Third World farmers only have access to local markets. Roads are poor, means of communication are limited, and storage capacities which would reduce the need to sell produce immediately after harvesting are often unavailable. There are...
References
Bairoch, P. (1993). Economics and world history: Myths and paradoxes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Chan, M.-X., Otsuki, T., & Wilson, J.-S. (2006). Do standards matter for export success? (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3809). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
FAO. (2005). Agricultural trade and poverty: Can trade work for the poor? In The state of food and agriculture (SOFA). Rome: FAO.
FAO. (2011). Global food losses and food waste. Rome: FAO.
Havro, G., & Santiso, J. (2008). The curse of raw materials?”In Policy insights No. 75, OECD Development Center, OECD.
International Trade Centre. (2010). Challenges in agri-food exports: Building the quality infrastructure. International Trade Forum – Issue 03/2010, Geneva.
Koroma, S., Mosoti, V., Mutai, H., Coulibaly, A., & Iafrate, M. (2009). Towards an African common market for agricultural products. Lapodini. Rome: FAO.
Lamy, P. (2006, October 30). Making trade work for development: Time for a new Geneva consensus. Emile Noël Lecture, New York University Law School.
Lamy, P. (2011, October). Interview with WTO Director Pascal Lamy. ICTSD. Trade Negotiations Insights, 10(7).
Otsuki, T., Wilson, J.-S., & Sewadeh, M. (2001). Saving two in a billion: Quantifying the trade effect of European food safety standards on African exports. Food Policy, 25–26, 495–514.
Rakotoarisoa, M.-A. (2011, December). Agriculture liberalization and economic integration in Africa, ICTSD. Trade Negotiation Insights, 10(9).
UNCTAD. (2010). Addressing the commodity problematique through trade-related policies, Geneva.
UNCTAD. (2011a). Innovative approaches to resolving commodity-related problems based on effective multi-stakeholder partnerships. Geneva: Trade and Development Board.
UNCTAD. (2011b). Recent developments in key commodity markets: Trends and challenges. Trade and Development Board, Note by the UNCTAD Secretariat, TD/B/C.I/MEM.2/19. November 09, 2011.
World Bank. (2008). Agriculture for development. World Development Report, Washington, DC.
World Bank. (2012a). De-fragmenting Africa: Deepening regional trade integration in goods and services. Report on trade in Africa, Washington, DC.
World Bank. (2012b). Africa can help feed Africa: Removing barriers to regional trade in food staples. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Trade Organisation. (2011). The WTO and preferential trade agreements: From co-existence to coherence. World trade report 2011, Geneva.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Adam, E. (2013). Trade and Development in the Food and Agricultural Sectors. In: Thompson, P., Kaplan, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_352-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_352-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6167-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities