Skip to main content

Food Risk Communication

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics
  • 109 Accesses

Synonyms

Communication in the alimentation sector; Communication on food issues; Food risk discourse

Introduction

The alimentation sector, as other types of industries, has to constantly respond to the changing conditions of modern times. The most important determinants responsible for alternations are connected with the reality of a contemporary epoch. First of all, the twenty-first century is influenced and shaped by the growing role of new technologies. Thus, the Internet, offering fast communication to a relatively large number of addressees, becomes an important medium in contacting current and potential stakeholders in the food industry. Secondly, the mobility of modern times concerns not only consumers but also food products since nowadays customers may have access to comestibles coming from very distant countries. In this case, such aspects as proper transportation, storage, and methods of dish preparations should be treated with great consideration. Thirdly, modern agriculture...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bennett, P. (2001). Understanding responses to risk: Some basic findings. In P. Bennett & K. Calman (Eds.), Risk communication and public health (pp. 3–19). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielenia-Grajewska, M. (2009). The role of metaphors in the language of investment banking. Iberica, 17, 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielenia-Grajewska, M. (2011). Rola Internetu w komunikacji prowadzonej przez polskie lotniska (na przykÅ‚adzie sytuacji kryzysowych spowodowanych trudnymi warunkami atmosferycznymi. PieniÄ…dze i Więź, 51, 156–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielenia-Grajewska, M. (2014). Metaphors and risk cognition in the discourse on food-borne diseases. In J. M. Mercantini & C. Faucher (Eds.), Risk cognition. Heidelberg Springer (in print).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirka, C. C., & Corrigall, E. A. (2010). Expanding possibilities through metaphor: Breaking biases to improve crisis management. Journal of Management Education, 34(2), 303–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, S., Rigby, D., & Wossink, A. (2012). Using best–worst scaling to explore perceptions of relative responsibility for ensuring food safety. Food Policy, 37, 661–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO/WHO. (2001). The application of risk communication to food standards and safety matters. Rome: Publishing and Multimedia Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, D. (2011). Top food safety stories of 2011: No. 1. Food Safety News. http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2011/12/europes-o104-outbreak-2011s-most-important-food-safety-story/. Accessed 20 Dec 2013.

  • Frewer, L. J. (2012). Risk perception, communication and food safety. In: H. Alpas, M. Smith & A. Kulmyrzaev (Eds.), Strategies for achieving food security in Central Asia (pp. 123–131). Bishkek: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, C. J., Lok, C., Morley, K., & Powell, D. A. (2011). Government management of two media-facilitated crises involving dioxin contamination of food. Public Understanding of Science, 20(2), 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, R. E., & McMakin, A. H. (2009). Risk communication: A handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, M. L., Cuite, C. L., & Hallman, W. K. (2009). When good food goes bad: Television network news and the spinach recall of 2006. Science Communication, 31(2), 238–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, W., & Brown, J. L. (2006). Consumer opinions about genetically engineered salmon and information effect on opinions: A qualitative approach. Science Communication, 28(2), 243–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachul, C., & Caulfield, T. (2011). Food allergy policy and the popular press: Perspectives from Canadian newspapers. Journal of Asthma & Allergy Educators, 2(6), 282–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. M., & Knight, S. L. (2006). The effect of a multicomponent professional development training on the beliefs and behaviors of community health educators concerning food irradiation. Health Education & Behaviour, 33(5), 703–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winickoff, D. E., & Bushey, D. M. (2010). Science and power in global food regulation: The rise of the Codex Alimentarius. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(3), 356–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Bielenia-Grajewska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bielenia-Grajewska, M. (2014). Food Risk Communication. In: Thompson, P., Kaplan, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_288-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_288-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6167-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics