Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Vertical Integration and Concentration in US Agriculture

  • Mary K. HendricksonEmail author
  • Harvey S. JamesJr.
  • William Heffernan
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_216-2



Vertical integration is the process whereby one firm merges with another firm from which it buys inputs or to which it sells output. Concentration reflects the degree of horizontal integration and defines the extent to which a firm has competitors. The food system in the United States has become increasingly integrated and concentrated during the last 100 years. Economists have long argued that economic factors – most notably economic efficiency – largely explain the increase in vertical integration and concentration in the agrifood industry (MacDonald et al. 2004), but others implicate the exercise of market power and changes in antitrust policy enforcement as explanations (Carstensen 2008; Hendrickson and Heffernan 2002). Concentration and integration (hereafter simply “consolidation”) in the food system raise a number of important ethical issues for farmers, agribusiness firms, and consumers. These ethical issues...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Berry, W. (1990). What are people for? San Francisco: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  2. Carstensen, P. C. (2008). Buyer power, competition policy, and antitrust: The competitive effects of discrimination among suppliers. Antitrust Bulletin, 53(20), 271–331.Google Scholar
  3. Clifford, S. (2011). Groceries fill aisles at stores like CVS. New York Times, 17 Jan.Google Scholar
  4. Constance, D. H., Martinez, F., Aboites, G., & Bonanno, A. (2013). The problems with poultry production and processing. In H. S. James Jr. (Ed.), The ethics and economics of agrifood competition (pp. 99–126). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. De Schutter, O. (2010). Addressing concentration in food supply chains: The role of competition law in tackling the abuse of buyer power. http://www.srfood.org/images/stories/pdf/otherdocuments/20101201_briefing-note-03_en.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2013.
  6. ETC Group. (2013). Putting the Cartel before the Horse ... and Farm, Seeds, Soil, Peasants, Etc. Communiqué, no. 111: 40. http://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/CartelBeforeHorse11Sep2013.pdf.
  7. Foer, A. A. (2010). Agriculture and antitrust enforcement issues in our 21st century economy (pp. 219–252). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture and Department of Justice. http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/workshops/ag2010/dc-agworkshop-transcript.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2011.Google Scholar
  8. Friedmann, H., & McMichael, P. (1989). Agriculture and the state system. Sociologia Ruralis, 29(2), 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuglie, K. O., Heisey P. W., King, J. L., Pray, C. E., Day-Rubenstein K., Schimmelpfennig D., Wang S. L., & Karmarkar-Deshmukh. R. (2011). “Research Investments and market structure in the food processing, agricultural input, and Biofuel Industries Worldwide. Washington, D.C.: USDA Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
  10. Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., & Busch, L. (2006). Differentiated standardization, standardized differentiation: The complexity of the global agrifood system. In T. Marsden & J. Murdoch (Eds.), Between the local and the global: Confronting complexity in the contemporary agri-food sector, Research in Rural Sociology and Development (Vol. 12, pp. 39–68). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  11. Heffernan, William D. and Douglas H. Constance. 1990. Concentration of Agricultural Markets. Department of Rural Sociology, University of Missouri-Columbia.Google Scholar
  12. Heffernan, W.D., Hendrickson, M. K., & Gronski, R. (1999). Consolidation in the food and agriculture system. Report to the National Farmers Union. 8 Jan. http://www.foodcircles.missouri.edu/whstudy.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2012.
  13. Hendrickson, M. K. (2015). Resilience in a concentrated and consolidated food system. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5(3), 418–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hendrickson, M. K., & Heffernan, W. D. (2002). Opening spaces through Relocalization: Locating potential resistance in the weaknesses of the global food system. Sociologia Ruralis, 43(4), 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hendrickson, M. K., & James, H. S., Jr. (2005). The ethics of constrained choice: How the industrialization of agriculture impacts farming and farmer behavior. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18, 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hendrickson, M. K., Heffernan, W. D., Howard, P., & Heffernan, J. (2002). Consolidation in food retailing and dairy. British Food Journal, 103(10), 715–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hendrickson, M. K., James, H. S., Jr., & Heffernan, W. D. (2008a). Does the world need U.S. farmers even if Americans don’t? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21, 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hendrickson, M. K., Wilkinson, J., Heffernan, W. D., & Gronski, R. (2008b). The global food system and nodes of power. Report prepared for Oxfam America. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337273.
  19. Hendrickson, M.K., Howard, P.H., & Constance, D.H.. (2017). Power, food and agriculture: Implications for farmers, consumers and communities. Division of applied social sciences working paper. Columbia: University of Missouri. Available at  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3066005, Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  20. Howard, P. H. (2009). Visualizing consolidation in the global seed industry: 1996–2008. Sustainability, 1(4), 1266–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howard, P. H. (2016). Concentration and power in the food system: Who controls what we eat? New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  22. Howard, P. H. (2017). Consolidation in global meat processing. Philhoward.net, 21 June. https://philhoward.net/2017/06/21/consolidation-in-global-meat-processing/.
  23. James, H. S., Jr. (2013a). Introduction to the ethics and economics of agrifood competition: Connotations, complications and commentary. In H. S. James Jr. (Ed.), The ethics and economics of agrifood competition (pp. 1–21). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. James, H. S., Jr. (Ed.). (2013b). The ethics and economics of agrifood competition. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. James, H. S., Jr., & Hendrickson, M. K. (2008). Perceived economic pressures and farmer ethics. Agricultural Economics, 38, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. James, H. S., Jr., Hendrickson, M. K., & Howard, P. H. (2013). Networks, power and dependency in the agrifood industry. In H. S. James Jr. (Ed.), The ethics and economics of agrifood competition (pp. 99–126). Dordrecht: Springer Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levins, R. (2002). Collective bargaining for farmers. Choices, 4th Quarter, 15–18.Google Scholar
  28. Lusk, J. (2013). The food police: A well-fed manifesto about the politics of your plate. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  29. Lynn, B. (2006). Breaking the chain: The antitrust case against Wal-Mart. Harper’s Magazine, 313(1874), 29–36.Google Scholar
  30. Lynn, B. (2009). Cornered: The monopoly capitalism and the politics of destruction. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Lyson, T. (2004). Civic agriculture: Reconnecting farm, food, and community. Medford: Tufts University Press.Google Scholar
  32. MacDonald, J. M. (2016). Concentration, contracting, and competition policy in U.S. agribusiness. Concurrences Competition Law Review, I, 3–9.Google Scholar
  33. MacDonald, J. M., Perry, J., Ahearn, M., Banker, D., Chambers, W., Dimitri, C., Key, N., Nelson, K., & Southard, L. (2004). Contracts, markets, and prices: Organizing the production and use of agricultural commodities. Agricultural economic report no. 837, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
  34. McIntyre, B., Herren, H., Wakhungu, J., & Watson, R. (2008). Agriculture at a crossroads: Report of the international assessment of agriculture knowledge science and technology for development. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  35. McWilliams, J. (2009). Just food: Where locavores get it wrong and how we can truly eat responsibly. New York: Little Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  36. Peine, E. K. (2013). Trading on pork and beans: Agribusiness and the construction of the Brazil-China-soy-pork commodity. Complex. In H. S. James Jr. (Ed.), The ethics and economics of agrifood competition (pp. 193–210). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rohwer, Y., & Westgren, R. (2013). Are ethics and efficiency locked in antithesis? In H. S. James Jr. (Ed.), The ethics and economics of agrifood competition (pp. 37–54). Dordrecht: Springer Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Story, M., Kaphingst, K. M., Robinson-O’Brien, R., & Glanz, K. (2008). Creating healthy food and eating environments: Policy and environmental approaches. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 253–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stuart, D. (2009). Constrained choice and ethical dilemmas in land management: Environmental quality and food safety in California agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 22(1), 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sykuta, M. E. (2013). The fallacy of “competition” in agriculture. In H. S. James Jr. (Ed.), The ethics and economics of agrifood competition (pp. 55–74). Dordrecht: Springer Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taylor, C. R., & Domina, D. (2010). Restoring economic health to contract poultry production. Report prepared for the Joint U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Agriculture/GIPSA Public Workshop on competition issues in the poultry industry, 21 May 2010, Normal.Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, C. R., & Moss, D. (2013). The fertilizer oligopoly: The case for global antitrust enforcement. Washington, DC: American Antitrust Institute. http://www.antitrustinstitute.org/sites/default/files/FertilizerMonograph.pdf.Google Scholar
  43. Thompson, P. B. (2013). Conceptualizing fairness in the context of competition: Philosophical sources. In H. S. James Jr. (Ed.), The ethics and economics of Agrifood competition (pp. 23–36). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. US Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDOJ-USDA). (2010). Proceedings, public workshops exploring competition issues in agriculture. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture and Department of Justice. http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/workshops/ag2010/iowa-agworkshop-transcript.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2012.Google Scholar
  45. Ver Ploeg, M. (2009). Access to affordable and nutritious food: Measuring and understanding food deserts and their consequences. USDA Economic research service, report to congress. http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/242675/ap036_1_.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2013.
  46. Wilkinson, J. (2002). The final foods industry and the changing face of the global agrofood system: Up against a new technology paradigm and a new demand profile. Sociologia Ruralis, 42, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wood, S. (2013). Revisiting the US food retail consolidation wave: Regulation, market power and spatial outcomes. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(2), 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary K. Hendrickson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Harvey S. JamesJr.
    • 1
  • William Heffernan
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Applied Social SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA