Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Cultured Meat

Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_106-2

Synonyms

Introduction

Making meat through tissue engineering is an idea under investigation. It has been attracting attention form many sides. For example, both animal activists and private investors, after initial hesitation, have tended to embrace it, because of its promise for animals and its innovative and disruptive market potential, respectively. Artists and designers have been triggered to play with the idea. Journalists have for years been wondering when it will appear on our plates.

In this contribution, I am interested in cultured meat against the moral background of the now widely shared idea that global levels of meat consumption are highly problematic for both animals and the planet. But I will not draw definite moral conclusions about the desirability of cultured meat as a product. In the context of the search for meat alternatives, cultured meat is not the only hopeful candidate. My question in this entry is what...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bastian, B., Loughnan, S., Haslam N., Radke H.R. (2012). Don’t mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38(2), 247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carr, G. (2016) The future of agriculture. The Economist: Technology Quarterly. Available from: http://www.economist.com/technology-quarterly/2016-06-09/factory-fresh
  3. Catts, O., & Zurr, I. (2007). Semi-living art. In E. Kac (Ed.), Signs of life: Bio art and beyond (pp. 231–247). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Churchill, W. (1932). Thoughts and adventures. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  5. der Weele, V. (2017). Cultured meat, better than beans? In J. Duncan & M. Bailey (Eds.), Sustainable food, multidisciplinary solutions (pp. 163–174). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Driessen, C., & Korthals, M. (2012). Pig towers and in vitro meat: Disclosing moral worlds by design. Social Studies of Science, 42(6), 797–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fairlie, S. (2010). Meat: A benign extravagance. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Fehrenbacher, K. (2013, February 21). Silicon Valley embraces innovation in sustainable foods. Bloomberg News. Available from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-02-21/silicon-valley-embraces-innovation-in-sustainable-foods
  9. Graça, J., Calheiros, M., & Oliveira, A. (2014). Moral disengagement in harmful but cherished food practices. An exploration into the case of meat. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 27(5), 749–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haagsman, H. P., Hellingwerf, K. J., & Roelen, B. A. J. (2009). Production of animal proteins by cell systems. Utrecht University, Faculty of veterinary medicine. Available from: http://www.google.nl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiKso29sbbVAhUlDMAKHc2sBuIQFggqMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.732.9877%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&usg=AFQjCNFsr5Vqp7hjO6ed-ee0CwuVEDbeiQ
  11. Harrison, R. (1964). Animal machines. London: Vincent Stuart Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Hoek, A. C. (2010). Will novel protein foods beat meat? Consumer acceptance of meat substitutes – a multidisciplinary research approach. Submitted doctoral thesis, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
  13. Hoek, A. C., Luning, P. A., Weijzen, P., Engels, W., Kok, F. J., & de Graaf, C. (2011). Replacement of meat by meat substitutes: A survey on person-and product-related factors in consumer acceptance. Appetite, 56(3), 662–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holm, L., & Møhl, M. (2000). The role of meat eating in everyday food culture: An analysis of an interview study in Copenhagen. Appetite, 34, 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hopkins, P. D., & Dacey, A. (2008). Vegetarian meat: Could technology save animals and satisfy meat eaters? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21(6), 579–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobsen, R. (2016, September 6). The biography of a plant-based burger. Pacific Standard. Available from: https://psmag.com/news/the-biography-of-a-plant-based-burger
  17. Jönsson, E. (2016). Benevolent technotopias and hitherto unimaginable meats: Tracing the promises of in vitro meat. Social Studies of Science, 46(5), 725–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moore Lappé, F. (1971). Diet for a small planet. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  19. Onwezen, M. C., & van der Weele, C. N. (2016). When indifference is ambivalence: Strategic ignorance about meat consumption. Food Quality and Preference, 52, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pincock, S. (2007). Meat, in vitro? The Scientist. Available from: www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/25358/title/Meat–in-vitro-/. Accessed 22 Feb 2017.
  21. Purdy, C. (2016, November 13) How the vegan movement broke out of its echo chamber and finally started disrupting things. Quartz. Available from: https://qz.com/829956/how-the-vegan-movement-broke-out-of-its-echo-chamber-and-finally-started-disrupting-things/
  22. Purdy, C. (2017, June 27). Hampton Creek is now growing its own meat in its lab – And it says it will get to the stores first. Quartz. Available from: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hampton-creek-now-growing-own-201630209.html
  23. Sexton, A. E. (2016). Alternative proteins and the (non)stuff of “meat”. Gastronomica Fall, 2016, 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Swann, G. M. P. (2014). Common innovation; how we create the wealth of nations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  25. Van der Weele, C. (2013). Meat and the benefits of ambivalence. In H. Röcklinsberg & P. Sandin (Eds.), The ethics of consumption: The citizen, the market and the law (pp. 290–295). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Van der Weele, C., & Driessen, C. (2013). Emerging profiles for cultured meat; ethics through and as design. Animals, 3(3), 647–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van der Weele, C., & Driessen, C. (2014). Burgers over kweekvlees: ambivalentie onder het oppervlak. Wageningen: Wageningen UR.Google Scholar
  28. Van Mensvoort, K., & Grievink, H.-J. (2014). The in vitro meat cookbook. Amsterdam: Bis Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Welin, S., & Van der Weele, C. (2012). Cultured meat: Will it separate us from nature? In T. Potthast & S. Meisch (Eds.), Climate change and sustainable development. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Zaraska, M. (2016). Meathooked: The history and science of our 2.5-million-year obsession with meat. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy Group, Department of Social SciencesWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands