Skip to main content

Optical Manipulation and Sensing in a Microfluidic Device

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Photonics for Biomedical Engineering
  • 2223 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the realization of a lab-on-a-chip optical sensor that is based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) trapped microspheres acting as localized sensing elements for morphology-dependent resonance (MDR) sensing.

The microfluidic device is fabricated by a combination of direct laser writing and hot embossing. This allows simple integration of SPR techniques by the evaporative coating of a metal layer on the surface of the microfluidic device. Trapping of 4, 10, and 15 μm polystyrene microspheres is demonstrated using SPR in static and dynamic fluidic environments. Patterning of the metal surface is demonstrated to increase the trapping potential of the SPR technique as well as provide a method of further localizing the position of the optical trap within the device. Comparison between the trapping of microspheres for both on- and off-resonance incident angles of the trapping beam shows strong difference in the strength of the optical trap allowing for an on/off switching of the trapping force within the device. The integrated SPR trapping technique provides a method for arbitrary trapping of a range of microspheres within a microfluidic environment.

The MDR optical sensing technique was selected as a noninvasive, multivariable sensing technique that can be performed on a range of optically trapped microcavities. Coupling to the MDR of a spherical microcavity is achieved via evanescent wave coupling under total internal reflection within a static fluidic environment. Fluid refractive index detection is realized with a sensitivity of 9.66 × 10−2 refractive index units (RIU) by the characterization of the shift of the MDR positions. A quality (Q) factor of 1.1 × 104 is observed for a 90 μm glass microsphere with a stability of Δλ = ±0.04.

The coupling of light to the MDR mode is realized for a 90 μm glass microsphere trapped in a dynamic microfluidic device via SPR-based optical trapping. The position of the trapped microsphere is defined by the location of the patterned region of the metal surface as well as the position of the location of the focal spot of the SPR incident light source. A Q-factor of 4 × 103 is observed under these coupling conditions. Detection of a change in the refractive index of the local fluidic environment is observed via change in the MDR of a microcavity held under SPR trapping conditions; a resolution of 7.75 × 10–2 RIU is observed under a flow rate of 20 μm/s.

This research explores the integration of optical-based manipulation and localized sensing techniques into a microfluidic environment. From the work demonstrated, it is anticipated that this research will develop toward an optical-based sensing system where localized sensing can be performed in an arbitrary location within a fluidic environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mark M, Crain J, Douglas J et al (2009) Fully integrated three-dimensional electrodes for electrochemical detection in microchips: fabrication, characterization, and applications. Anal Chem 81:4762–4769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mandenius C (2000) Electronic noses for bioreactor monitoring. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 66:65–82

    Google Scholar 

  3. Navrtil M, Norberg A, Lembrn L, Mandenius C (2005) On-line multi-analyzer monitoring of biomass, glucose and acetate for growth rate control of a Vibrio cholerae fed-batch cultivation. J Biotechnol 115:67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wannemacher R, Quinten M, Pack A (1999) Evanescent-wave scattering in near-field optical microscopy. J Microsc 194:260–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lambeck PV (1999) Remote opto-chemical sensing with extreme sensitivity: design, fabrication and performance of a pigtailed integrated optical phase-modulated Mach-Zehnder interferometer system. Sens Actuators B 61:100–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanyeri M, Nichkova M, Hammock BD, Kennedy IM (2005) Chemical and biological sensing through optical resonances in microcavities. In: Imaging, manipulation, and analysis of biomolecules and cells: fundamentals and applications III, vol 5699. Proceedings of the SPIE, San Jose, pp 227–236

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mandai S, Serey X, Erickson D (2010) Nanomanipulation using silicon photonic crystal resonators. Nano Lett 10:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huh YS, Chung AJ, Erickson D (2009) Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy and its application to molecular and cellular analysis. Microfluid Nanofluid 6:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Homola J, Koudela I, Yee SS (1999) Surface plasmon resonance sensors based on diffraction gratings and prism couplers: sensitivity comparison. Sens Actuators B 54:16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia-Chavez V, Spalding GC, Dholakia K (2005) Near- field optical manipulation by using evanescent waves and surface plasmon polaritons. In: Optical trapping and optical micromanipulation II, vol 5930. Proceedings of the SPIE, San Diego, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fang Q, Kim DP, Li X, Yoon TH, Li Y (2011) Facile fabrication of a rigid and chemically resistant micromixer system from photocurable inorganic polymer by static liquid photolithography (SLP). Lab Chip 11:2779–2784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arnold A, Shopova SI (2011) Whispering gallery mode biosensor: fulfilling the promise of single virus detection without labels. In: Biophotonics: spectroscopy, imaging, sensing and manipulation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 237–259

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lezec HJ, Thio T (2004) Diffracted evanescent wave model for enhanced and suppressed optical transmission through subwavelength hole arrays. Opt Express 12:3629–3651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luo J, Zhuang X, Yao J (2012) Enlarging the evanescent field scope by nanoparticle scattering for nanoparticle sensing of optical fiber sensors. J Nanoeng Nanosyst 226:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dienerowitz M, Gibson G, Bowman R, Padgett M (2011) Holographic tweezers: a platform for plasmonics. In: Optical trapping and optical micromanipulation VIII, vol 8097. Proceedings of the SPIE, San Diego. doi: 10.1117/12.894695

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bowman R, Wright A, Padgett M (2010) An SLM-based Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor for aberration correction in optical tweezers. J Opt 12:124004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang J, Lin H, Sun JP, Feng X, Gillis K, Moldover M (2010) Cylindrical acoustic resonator for the re-determination of the Boltzmann constant. Int J Thermophys 31:1273–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brouhard G, Schek H, Hunt AJ (1981) Advanced optical tweezers for the study of cellular and molecular biomechanics. Phys Rev Lett 47:1927–1930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reece P, Garcia-Chavez V, Dholakia K (2006) Near-field optical micromanipulation with cavity enhanced evanescent waves. Appl Phys Lett 88:221116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Righini M, Girard C, Quidant R (2008) Light-induced manipulation with surface plasmons. J Opt A 10:093001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Righini M, Volpe G, Girard C, Petrov D, Quidant R (2008) Surface plasmon optical tweezers: tunable optical manipulation in the femtonewton range. Phys Rev Lett 100:186804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rindzevicius T, Alaverdyan Y, Sepulveda B et al (2007) Nanohole plasmons in optically thin gold films. J Phys Chem C 111:1207–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lalanne P, Rodier JC, Hugonin J (2005) Surface plasmons of metallic surfaces perforated by nanohole arrays. J Opt A 7:422–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller R, Malyarchuk V, Lienau C (2003) Three-dimensional theory on light-induced near-field dynamics in a metal film with a periodic array of nanoholes. Phys Rev B 68:2054151–2054159

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cesario J, Quidant R, Badenes G, Enoch S (2005) Electromagnetic coupling between a metal nanoparticle grating and a metallic surface. Opt Lett 30:3404–3406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson PB, Christy RW (1972) Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys Rev B 6:4370–4379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Thormann E, Simonsen AC, Hansen PL, Mouritsen O (2008) Interactions between a polystyrene particle and hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces in aqueous solutions. Langmuir 24:7278–7284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Green R, Davies M, Roberts C, Tendler S (1998) A surface plasmon resonance study of albumin adsorption to PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymers. J Biomed Mat Res 42:165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boxshall K, Wu MH, Cui Z, Cui ZF, Watts J, Baker MA (2006) Simple surface treatments to modify protein adsorption and cell attachment properties within a poly(dimethylsiloxane) micro-bioreactor. Surf Interface Anal 38:198–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Garcia-Chavez V, Quidant R, Reece P, Badenes G, Torner L, Dholakia K (2006) Extended organization of colloidal microparticles by surface plasmon polariton excitation. Phys Rev B 73:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ashkin A, Dziedzic JM (1981) Observation of optical resonances of dielectric spheres by light scattering. Appl Opt 20:1803–1814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Caldas P, Jorge P, Araujo FM et al (2010) Interrogation of microresonators using multimode fibers. In: 4th European workshop on optical fiber sensors, vol 7653, Porto. doi:10.1117/12.866355

    Google Scholar 

  33. Morrish D, Gan X, Gu M (2004) Morphology-dependent resonance induced by two-photon excitation in a micro-sphere trapped by a femtosecond pulsed laser. Opt Express 12:4198–4202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rahman A (2011) Temperature sensor based on dielectric optical microresonator. Opt Fib Technol 17:536–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Poon AW, Courvoisier F, Chang RK (2001) Multimode resonances in square-shaped optical microcavities. Opt Lett 26:632–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zamora V, Dez A, Andrs MV, Gimeno B (2011) Cylindrical optical microcavities: basic properties and sensor applications. Photonics Nanostruct Fundam Appl 9:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kippenberg TJ, Spillane SM, Vahala KJ (2004) Demonstration of ultra-high-Q small mode volume toroid microcavities on a chip. Appl Phys Lett 85:6113–6115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Teraoka I, Arnold S (2009) Resonance shifts of counter-propagating whispering-gallery modes: degenerate perturbation theory and application to resonator sensors with axial symmetry. J Opt Soc Am B 26:1321–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Savchenkov A, Matsko A, Maleki L (2006) White-light whispering gallery mode resonators. Opt Lett 31:92–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cai M, Painter O, Vahala KJ, Sercel PC (2000) Fiber-coupled microsphere laser. Opt Lett 25:1430–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Elliott G, Murugan G, Wilkinson J, Zervas MN, Hewak DW (2010) Chalcogenide glass microsphere laser. Opt Express 18:26720–26727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dumeige Y, Fron P (2006) Whispering-gallery-mode analysis of phase-matched doubly resonant second-harmonic generation. Phys Rev A 74:063804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dominguez-Juarez JL, Kozyreff G, Martorell J (2011) Whispering gallery microresonators for second harmonic light generation from a low number of small molecules. Nat Commun 2:254–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Serpengzel A, Poon A (2011) Optical processes in microparticles and nanostructures. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vollmer F, Arnold S (2008) Whispering-gallery-mode biosensing: label-free detection down to single molecules. Nat Methods 5:591–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yoshie T, Tang L, Su SY (2011) Optical microcavity: sensing down to single molecules and atoms. Sensors 11:1972–1991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gervinskas G, Day D, Juodkazis S (2011) High-precision interferometric monitoring of polymer swelling using a simple optofluidic sensor. Sens Actuators B 159:39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Day .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Day, D., Weber, S., Gu, M. (2017). Optical Manipulation and Sensing in a Microfluidic Device. In: Ho, AP., Kim, D., Somekh, M. (eds) Handbook of Photonics for Biomedical Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5052-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics