The Everglades (USA)

  • Curtis J. Richardson
Reference work entry


The Everglades is the largest subtropical wetland in the United States. It has been designated an International Biosphere Reserve, a World Heritage Site, and a Wetland of International Importance, in recognition of its significance to all the people of the world. However, the Everglades have undergone radical changes in both water flow and water quality over the years as the population in the state of Florida has exploded and agricultural lands have increased significantly during the past century. As a result the Florida Everglades, a peat based fen have been significantly reduced in size due to massive water drainage programs to convert these areas mainly to agriculture lands or urban areas.Together the US government and the state of Florida have spent several billion dollars to restore the water supply and ecohydrology for the remaining 50% of the Everglades, which includes native Seminole Indian Reservations. Both governments face enormous social-economic and political difficulties regarding the future allocation of water for the Everglades as the demand for water for agriculture and urban areas grows. This chapter compares and contrasts the past and current ecological conditions in the marshes, outlines the hydrologic issues facing these wetlands today as well as reviews some of the proposed solutions.


  1. Browder JA, Gleason PJ, Swift DR. Periphyton in the Everglades: spatial variation, environmental correlates and ecological implications. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC, editors. Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. Delray Beach: Lucie Press; 1994. p. 379–418.Google Scholar
  2. CERP (Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan). 2005 report to congress. Available from: Accessed 31 May 2016.
  3. Chen C, Meselhe E, Waldon M. Assessment of mineral concentration impacts from pumped stormwater on an Everglades wetland, Florida, USA – using a spatially-explicit model. J Hydrol. 2012;452–453:25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper SR, Goman M, Richardson CJ. Historical changes in water quality and vegetation in WCA-2A determined by paleoecological analyses. In: Richardson CJ, editor. The Everglades experiments: lessons for ecosystem restoration. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 321–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craft CB, Richardson CJ. Peat accretion and phosphorus accumulation along an eutrophication gradient in the northern Everglades. Biogeochemistry. 1993;22:133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craft CB, Richardson CJ. Relationships between soil nutrients and plant species composition in Everglades peatlands. J Environ Qual. 1997;26:224–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Craft CB, Richardson CJ. Soil characteristics of the Everglades peatland. In: Richardson CJ, editor. The Everglades experiments: lessons for ecosystem restoration. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Craft CB, Vymazal J, Richardson CJ. Response of Everglades plant communities to nitrogen and phosphorus additions. Wetlands. 1995;15:258–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis JH. The natural features of southern Florida. Fl Geol Soc Geol Bull. 1943;25:1–311.Google Scholar
  10. Davis SM, Ogden JC. Toward ecosystem restoration. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC, editors. Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. Delray Beach: St. Lucie Press; 1994. p. 769–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis SM, Gunderson LH, Park WA, Richardson JR, Mattson JE. Landscape dimension, composition, and function in a changing Everglades ecosystem. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC, editors. Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. Delray Beach: St. Lucie Press; 1994. p. 419–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Germain G, Pietro K. Chapter 5: STA performance and optimization. In: 2011 South Florida environmental report. West Palm Beach: South Florida Water Management District; 2011.Google Scholar
  13. Glaser PH, Volin JC, Givnish TJ, Hansen BCS, Stricker CA. Carbon and sediment accumulation in the Everglades (USA) during the past 4000 years: rates, drivers, and sources of error. J Geophys Res. 2012;117:G03026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glaser PH, Hansen BCS, Donovan JJ, Givnish TJ, Stricker CA, Volin JC. Holocene dynamics of the Florida Everglades with respect to climate, dustfall, and tropical storms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;43:17211–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gleason PJ, Stone P. Age, origin and landscape evolution of the Everglades peatlands. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC, editors. Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. Delray Beach: St. Lucie Press; 1994. p. 149–98.Google Scholar
  16. Gunderson LH, Loftus WT. The Everglades. In: Martin WH, Boyce SG, Echtemacht ACE, editors. Biodiversity of the southeastern United States: lowland terrestrial communities. New York: Wiley; 1993. p. 199–255.Google Scholar
  17. Harvey JW, McCormick PV. Groundwater’s significance to changing hydrology, water chemistry, and biological communities of a floodplain ecosystem, Everglades, South Florida. USA Hydrogeol J. 2009;17:185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, editors. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  19. Ives JC. Memoir to accompany a military map of the peninsula of Florida south of Tampa Bay. New York: War Department; 1856.Google Scholar
  20. Kloor K. Everglades restoration plan hits rough waters. Science. 2000;288:1166–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lodge TE. The Everglades handbook: understanding the ecosystem. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  22. Pan Y, Stevenson RJ, Vaithiyanathan P, Slate J, Richardson CJ. Changes in algal assemblages along observed and experimental phosphorus gradients in a subtropical wetland. USA Freshw Biol. 2000;44:339–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parker GG, Ferguson GE, Love SK. Water resources of southeastern Florida, water-supply paper 1255. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey; 1955.Google Scholar
  24. Pearlstine LG, Pearlstine EV, Aumen NG. A review of the ecological consequences and management implications of climate change for the Everglades. J N Am Benthol Soc. 2010;29:1510–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Porter JW, Porter KF. The Everglades, Florida Bay, and coral reefs of the Florida Keys: an ecosystem sourcebook. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  26. Qualls RG, Richardson CJ. Carbon cycling and dissolved organic matter export in the northern everglades. In: Richardson CJ, editor. The Everglades experiments: lessons for ecosystem restoration. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 351–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reddy KR, Newman S, Osborne TZ, White JR, Fitz HC. Phosphorus cycling in the greater Everglades ecosystem: legacy phosphorus implications for management and restoration. Crit Reg Environ Sci Technol. 2011;41(supp. 1):149–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson CJ. Freshwater wetlands. In: Barbour MG, Billings WD, editors. North American terrestrial vegetation. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 448–99.Google Scholar
  29. Richardson CJ. The Everglades experiments: lessons for ecosystem restoration. New York: Springer; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Richardson CJ. The Everglades: North America’s subtropical wetland. Wetl Ecol Manag. 2010;18:517–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richardson CJ, Vaithiyanathan P. Phosphorus sorption characteristics of Everglades soils along a eutrophication gradient. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1995;59:1782–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richardson CJ, Qian S, Craft CB, Qualls RG. Predictive models for phosphorus retention in wetlands. Wetl Ecol Manag. 1997;4:159–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richardson CJ, Ferrell GM, Vaithiyanathan P. Nutrient effects on stand structure, resorption efficiency, and secondary compounds in Everglades sawgrass. Ecology. 1999;80:2182–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Romanowicz EA, Richardson CJ. Geologic settings and hydrology gradients in the Everglades. In: Richardson CJ, editor. The Everglades experiments: lessons for ecosystem restoration. New York: Springer; 2008.Google Scholar
  35. Rydin H, Jeglum JK. The biology of peatlands. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sandoval E, Price RM, Whitman D, Melesse AM. Long-term (11 years) study of water balance, flushing times and water chemistry of a coastal wetland undergoing restoration, Everglades, Florida, USA. Catena. 2016;144:74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sklar FH, van der Valk AG, editors. Tree islands of the Everglades. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2002.Google Scholar
  38. Stokstad E. Big land purchase triggers review of plans to restore Everglades. Science. 2008;321:22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Todd MJ, Muneepeerakul R, Pumo D, Azaele S, Miralles-Wilhelm F, Rinaldo A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. Hydrological drivers of wetland vegetation community distribution within Everglades National Park, Florida. Adv Water Resour. 2010;33:1279–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vymazal J, Richardson CJ. Species composition, biomass, and nutrient content of periphyton in the Florida Everglades. J Phycol. 1995;31:343–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang H, Meselhe EA, Waldon MG. Compartment-based hydrodynamics and water quality modeling of a northern Everglades wetland, Florida USA. Ecol Model. 2012;247:273–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waters MN, Smoak JM, Saunders CJ. Historic primary producer communities linked to water quality and hydrologic changes in the northern Everglades. J Paleolimnol. 2013;49:67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Willard DA, Bernhardt CE. Impacts of past climate and sea level change on Everglades wetlands: placing a century of anthropogenic change into a late-Holocene context. Clim Change. 2011;107:59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nicholas School of the EnvironmentDuke University Wetland CenterDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations