Abstract
The goal of being a Buddhist is to release oneself from the bondage of samsara, the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth. The Buddhist does this by cultivating and perfecting wisdom and compassion. Wisdom is the knowledge that all things are interdependent, and compassion is that willingness to relieve sentient beings of their sufferings. These two principles inform the Buddhist attitude in bioethical matters. Furthermore, Buddhism sees that the main factor in evaluating the ethical value of an action is motivation or intention. The same type of action may be judged negatively or positively depending on the quality of motivation behind it. If an act is performed out of wisdom and compassion, then it is “wholesome,” meaning that it is a good act, since it contributes to realizing the final goal. The article discusses this general principle in some specific issues, namely, beginning of life, end of life, and human vulnerability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Becker, C. B. (1990). Buddhist views of suicide and euthanasia. Philosophy East and West, 40(4), 543–556.
Bodhi, B. (Ed.). (2007). A comprehensive manual of Abhidhamma: The Abhidhammattha Sangaha of Acariya Anuruddha. Mahathera Narada (transl.) (3rd ed.). Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.
Garces-Foley, K. (2003). Buddhism, hospice, and the American way of dying. Review of Religious Research, 44(4), 341–353.
Gethin, R. (1998). The foundations of Buddhism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Keown, D. (2001). Buddhism and bioethics. New York: Palgrave.
Keown, D. (2005). End of life: The Buddhist view. Lancet, 366, 952–955.
Keown, D., & Keown, J. (1995). Killing, karma and caring: Euthanasia in Budhdism and Christianity. Journal of Medical Ethics, 21(5), 265–269.
Nagarjuna. (1995). The fundamental wisdom of the middle way: Nagarjuna’s Mulamadhyamakakarika (Jay L. Garfield, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Perrett, R. W. (1996). Buddhism, euthanasia and the sanctity of life. Journal of Medical Ethics, 22(5), 309–313.
Promta, S. (1998). Buddhism and ethical problems: Prostitution, abortion and euthanasia. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press [in Thai].
Promta, S. (2004). Human cloning and embryonic stem cell research: A view from the Theravada Buddhist morality. Paper presented at the first workshop of the “ASEAN-EU LEMLIFE Project,” 24 January 2004, Chulalongkorn University. Retrieved November 25, 2011, from http://www.stc.arts.chula.ac.th/Cloning%20and%20Stem%20Cell-Buddhist.pdf
Siderits, M. (2007). Buddhism as philosophy: An introduction. London: Ashgate.
Solbakk, J. H. (2011). Vulnerability: A futile or useful principle in healthcare ethics? In R. Chadwick, H. ten Have, & E. M. Meslin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of healthcare ethics (pp. 228–238). London: Sage.
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. (2005). Retrieved November 26, 2011, from http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hongladarom, S. (2014). Buddhism. In: ten Have, H., Gordijn, B. (eds) Handbook of Global Bioethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_88
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_88
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2511-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2512-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law