Abstract
Benefit sharing is a legal term used in the context of access to and utilization of biological resources. Its meaning is simple: those who contribute to scientific research and innovation ought to share in the resulting benefits. If benefit sharing with the contributors of biological resources and related knowledge does not take place, scientific advancement is exploitative. The main legal instrument to govern benefit sharing is the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD. (1992). Retrieved from http://www.cbd.int/convention/text).
On a broader understanding of benefit sharing, results from scientific research should be shared with society as a whole and in particular with developing countries. This more aspirational meaning of benefit sharing is expressed, for instance, in the UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UNESCO. (2005). Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/bioethics-and-human-rights/).
This chapter examines both aspects of benefit sharing and aligns them with different conceptions of justice. The access and benefit-sharing requirements of the CBD – which covers plants, animals, microorganisms, and traditional knowledge – will be described as a justice-in-exchange mechanism. The same applies to the benefit-sharing provisions for human biological resources as found in the Declaration of Helsinki (2008). The distributive justice aspects of benefit sharing, which conform strongly to the human rights framework, will be examined using the above mentioned UNESCO Declaration. Four cases are provided for illustration purposes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abutu, A. (2010). Sufferers urge progress on sickle cell drug Nicosan, SciDevNet. Retrieved from http://www.scidev.net/en/news/sufferers-urge-progress-on-sickle-cell-drug-nicosan.html
Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). Retrieved from http://www.cbd.int/convention/text
Human Genome Project’s Ethics Committee Statement on Benefit Sharing. (2000). Retrieved from http://www.hugo-international.org/img/benefit_sharing_2000.pdf
Kimmelman, J., Weijer, C., & Meslin, E. M. (2009). Helsinki discords: FDA, ethics, and international drug trials. Lancet, 373, 13–14.
Mayer, R. (2007). What’s wrong with exploitation? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(2), 137–150.
Pogge, T. (2008). World poverty and human rights (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Schroeder, D., & Pogge, T. (2009). Justice and the convention on biological diversity. Ethics and International Affairs, 23, 265–278.
Sen, A. (1983). Poverty and famines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shiva, V. (1991). The violence of the green revolution: Third world agriculture, ecology and politics. London: Zed Books.
UNESCO. (2005). Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/bioethics-and-human-rights/
Wynberg, R., & Chennells, R. (2009). Green diamonds of the South: A review of the San-Hoodia case. In R. Wynberg, D. Schroeder, & R. Chennells (Eds.), Indigenous peoples, consent and benefit sharing – Lessons from the San Hoodia case. Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Schroeder, D. (2014). Sharing of Benefits. In: ten Have, H., Gordijn, B. (eds) Handbook of Global Bioethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_78
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_78
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2511-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2512-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law