Skip to main content

Social Responsibility and Health

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Global Bioethics

Abstract

The idea of “social responsibility” has come into use to point to a new ethical approach to the goals and strategies of companies and institutions, starting with the private ones. The focus is no longer merely on maximizing profit for the stockholders, but on the various interests and needs of the stakeholders, that is, the many individuals and organizations that are in different ways targeted by and/or involved in the activity of an economic actor. The concept of social responsibility is clearly formulated in Article 14 of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights of 2005. It is related to the fundamental human right to enjoy the highest attainable standard of health in a dual sense. On the one hand, the promotion of health and social development for their people is “a central purpose of governments” that is yet to be shared by “all sectors of society.” On the other hand, we ought to take into account that the health of every human being largely depends, besides their genetic endowment and personal behaviors, on social determinants that are only very partially within their control. Therefore, the commitment to respect, protect, and fulfill this right has necessarily to involve a broad range of actions. It is not just about access to quality health care. It is about improving all the means to prevent diseases and suffering and to deal with them better. According to this conception, some frameworks of action seem to be crucial: education and lifestyles, media and information, professionals and research, the global market, as well as international cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Council of Europe 1996 (1961). The European social charter. Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N., & Sabin, J. E. (2008). Setting limits fairly: Learning to share resources for health. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Cambridge/New York/Melbourne/Madrid/Cape Town/Singapore/São Paulo/Delhi/Dubai/Tokyo: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrafa, V., Kottow, M., & Saada, A. (Eds.). (2005). Estatuto Epistemológico de la Bioética. Mexico: Unam/Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standard Organization. (2010). Iso 26000: Guidance on social responsibility. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T. (2008). World poverty and human rights. Cambridge, UK/Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (2009). Justice. What’s the right thing to do. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semplici, S. (Ed.). (2011). The importance of social responsibility in the promotion of Health. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 14, 355–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2010). The idea of justice. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. London: Millar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2006). Making globalization work. The next steps to global justice. London: Allen Lane, Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2005). Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2010). Report of the International Bioethics Committee on social responsibility and health. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1966a). International covenant on civil and political rights. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1966b). International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2011). Human development report 2011. New York: United Nations Development Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2001). The Doha declaration on the TRIPS agreement and public health. Doha.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Semplici .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Semplici, S. (2014). Social Responsibility and Health. In: ten Have, H., Gordijn, B. (eds) Handbook of Global Bioethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_77

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_77

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2511-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2512-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics