Abstract
It is a relatively common assertion today that globalization is leading to a change in the role of the corporation. While globalization exposes the limited ability of nation-states to develop effective systems of global regulation, concurrently, we witness privatization of areas that formerly were the responsibility of the state. The combination of a global governance deficit, increasingly influenced by corporate responses such as self-regulation and/or involvement in global institutions, combined with a greater involvement of corporations in delivering roles formerly assigned to state governments, has led to proposals that we need a new paradigm for CSR. It is suggested, by Scherer and Palazzo, that this paradigm needs to recognize the more politically active role of business in today’s evolving post-Westphalian global order. This “political CSR” needs to acknowledge that the old presumptions of liberal democratic theory, in which there is a strict separation of the political and economic spheres, no longer applies. Instead, Scherer and Palazzo argue that, for pragmatic reasons, the theory of “political CSR” should be informed by Habermas’s theory of deliberative democracy.
In this chapter, we first outline the arguments made both for “political CSR” and for its linking to deliberative democracy. We argue that by presenting deliberative democracy as a pragmatic and procedural approach to questions of the political, Scherer and Palazzo overlook and sidestep the importance of also understanding the philosophical underpinnings of Habermas’s theory. Exploring those philosophical issues more directly, we expose the limitations and the hidden depoliticizing normativity of “political CSR” – illustrating this empirically with a critique of the Forest Stewardship Council, Scherer and Palazzo’s exemplar for “political CSR” and deliberative democracy. As a corrective, we confront directly the philosophical issues raised by Habermas’s development of critical theory. By situating his work in the context of philosophical debates in critical theory, both before and since Habermas, we show how critical theory has persistently failed to identify universal philosophical foundations from which to derive normative positions. In contrast to this problematic search for grounding universals, we argue that “political CSR” needs to be developed through political theory that recognizes that the core of the political is always difference, contestation, and undecidability. We propose therefore that “political CSR” ought to be developed with much more reference to post-foundational political philosophy and suggest that a more appropriate political theory to turn to would be Laclau and Mouffe’s social theory of hegemony and the radical democratic perspective that this leads to.
References
Donaldson T (2010) The values realignment in modern industrial society. Bus Ethics Quart 20(4):728–729, 724
Scherer A, Palazzo G (2008) Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In: Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J, Siegel D (eds) Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Scherer A, Palazzo G (2011) The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. J Manage Stud 48(4):899–931
Jones C, Parker M, Ten Bos R (2005) For business ethics. Routledge, London
Klein N (2008) The shock doctrine: the rise of disaster capitalism. Penguin, Harmondsworth
Kobrin S (2009) Private political authority and public responsibility: transnational politics, transnational firms, and human rights. Bus Ethics Quart 19(3):349–374, 350
ActionAid (2006) Under the influence: exposing undue corporate influence over policy-making at the World Trade Organization. ActionAid International, Johannesburg. Available at: http://www.actionaid.org.uk/doc_lib/174_6_under_the_influence_final.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2011
Scherer A, Palazzo G (2007) Towards a political conception of corporate responsibility – business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Acad Manage Rev 32(4):1096–1120
Critchley S (2001) Continental philosophy: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kant I (1999) Critique of pure reason. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kant I (2007) Critique of judgement. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Weiskopf R, Willmott H (2011) Ethics as critical practice: filling the undecided space within the moral field of organization. Paper presented at Third International Symposium on Process Organization Studies, Corfu, Greece
Willke H, Willke G (2008) Corporate moral legitimacy and the legitimacy of morals: a critique of Palazzo/Scherer’s communicative framework. J Bus Ethics 81:27–38
Finlayson J (2005) Habermas: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 53
Swingewood A (2000) A short history of sociological thought. Macmillan, Basingstoke, 204
Habermas J (1992) The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Polity, Cambridge
Habermas J (1990) Moral consciousness and communicative action. Polity, Cambridge, 65
Habermas J (1996) Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Polity, Cambridge, 107 and 110
Edward P, Willmott H (2008) Structures, identities and politics: bringing corporate citizenship into the corporation. In: Scherer A, Palazzo G (eds) Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship. Edward Elgar, Aldershot
http://www.fsc.org/about-fsc.html. Accessed 29 June 2011
Rainforest Foundation (2002) Trading in credibility: the myth and reality of the Forest Stewardship Council. Available from: http://www.rainforestfoundationuk.org/files/Trading%20in%20Credibility%20full%20report.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2011
Fern (2011) FERN statement to the Forest Stewardship Council on withdrawing FERN's membership. Available from: http://www.fern.org/leavingFSC. Accessed 29 June 2011
http://www.fsc-watch.org/. Accessed 29 June 2011
Fern et al (2008) Regaining credibility and rebuilding support: changes the FSC needs to make to ensure it regains and maintain its credibility. Available from: http://www.fern.org/sites/fern.org/files/changes%20the%20FSC%20needs%20to%20make.pdf Accessed 29 June 2011
Fern (2009) FERN’s position on the FSC. Available from: http://www.fern.org/sites/fern.org/files/FERN%20position%20on%20FSC.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2011
http://www.fsc.org/en/whats_new/news/news/30. Accessed 24 Oct 2007
Adorno T (1973) Negative dialectics. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Horkheimer M (1976) Traditional and critical theory. In: Connerton P (ed) Critical sociology. Penguin, Harmondsworth
Bernstein J (1995) Recovering ethical life: Jürgen Habermas and the future of critical theory. Routledge, London
Honneth A (1999) The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity, Cambridge
Adorno T, Horkheimer M (1997) Dialectic of enlightenment. Verso, London
Brunkhorst H (1998) Adorno. In: Critchley S, Schroeder W (eds) A companion to continental philosophy. Blackwell, Oxford
Honneth A (1999) The social dynamics of disrespect: situating critical theory today. In: Dews P (ed) Habermas: a critical reader. Blackwell, Oxford
Honneth A (2003) The point of recognition: the rejoinder to the rejoinder. In: Honneth A, Fraser N (eds) Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. Verso, London
Laclau E, Mouffe C (2001) Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. Verso, London
Marchart O (2007) Post-foundational political thought: political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
Laclau E (1996) Emancipation(s). Verso, London
Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston
Freeman RE (2002) A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In: Hartman L (ed) Perspectives in business ethics. McGraw-Hill, Boston
Hanlon G (2008) Rethinking corporate social responsibility and the role of the firm – on the denial of politics. In: Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J, Siegel D (eds) Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 160
FERN statement to the Forest Stewardship Council (2011) Why FERN is withdrawing its FSC membership 2 June 2011. Available at: http://www.fern.org/sites/fern.org/files/FERN%20leaving%20FSC_0.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2011
Willmott H (2011) “Institutional work” for what? Problems and prospects of institutional theory. J Manage Inquiry 20:67–72
Pollner M (1975) The very coinage of your brain: the anatomy of reality disjunctures. Philos Soc Sci 5:411–430
Torfing J (1999) New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Blackwell, Oxford
Porter M, Kramer M (2006) Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Bus Rev 84(12):78–92
Hanlon G, Fleming P (2009) Updating the critical perspective on corporate social responsibility. Sociol Compass 2(6):1–12
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Edward, P., Willmott, H. (2013). Discourse and Normative Business Ethics. In: Luetge, C. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_88
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_88
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1493-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1494-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law