Skip to main content

Abstract

Aristotle claims that character develops over time as one acquires habits from parents and community, first through reward and punishment. One acquires a good character much as one may learn to play a musical instrument: initially, one may be under some pressure to practice, but eventually, one enjoys playing with skill and understanding. Aristotle claims that one is partly responsible for one’s character, but he thereby raises the question whether one freely chooses one’s character. A person of good character does choose freely, however, and is able to frame complex situations accurately. The full development of character requires rational reflection: Aristotle argues that dialectic, to which Rawls’s reflective equilibrium bears some resemblance, generates principles that can guide us, though they do not serve as unexceptionable rules. A business ethics course, and in particular the case study method, may increase students’ understanding of ethical principles and of the ways in which environmental influences may undermine ethical thought and language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kupperman J (1991) Character. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frankfurt HG (1981) Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. In: Watson G (ed) Free will. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 81–95

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics IX 4 1066a13–29, b7–14

    Google Scholar 

  4. LeBar M (2009) Virtue ethics and deontic constraints. Ethics 119:642–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics II 3 1104b5ff

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics I 3 1095a2–13

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hursthouse R (1999) On virtue ethics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics II 7–8

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics III 2 1112a2f

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics II 4 1105b13–19; cf. II 2 1103b28–30

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aristotle Nicomachean ethics X 9 1180a7–10

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maitland I, Virtue or control in the governance of the firm, Unpublished

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics III 5 1114b23

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics III 5 1113b32

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics III 5 1114a6

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics III 5 1114b1

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elster J (1985) Sour grapes: studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Audi R (2012) Virtue ethics as a resource in business. Bus Ethics Quart (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics III 5 1114a32–b3

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics VII 3 1147a25–b3

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, New Series 211(4481):453–458

    Google Scholar 

  22. Werhane P (1999) Moral imagination and management decision-making. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bazerman M, Tenbrunsel A (2011) Blind spots: why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  24. Milgram S (1974) Obedience to authority: an experimental view. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Doris J (2002) Lack of character: personality and moral behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenzweig P (2007) The Halo effect…and the eight other business delusions that deceive managers. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics IV 5 1125b26–1126a3

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frank RH (1988) Passions within reason: the strategic role of the emotions. W.W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics IX 4 1066b7–11

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chaiken S, Giner-Sorolla R, Chen S (1996) Beyond accuracy: defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing. In: Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds) The psychology of action: linking cognition and motivation to behavior. Guilford Press, New York, pp 553–578

    Google Scholar 

  31. Haidt J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev 108:814–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Belk R (1985) Materialism: trait aspects of living in the material world. J Consum Res 12:265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kasser T, Ryan RM (1996) Further examining the American dream: differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 22:280–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Haidt J (2006) The happiness hypothesis. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Aristotle Nicomachean ethics VII

    Google Scholar 

  36. MacIntyre A (1985) After virtue, 2nd edn. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  37. Alzola M (2008) Character and environment: the status of virtues in organizations. J Bus Ethics 78:343–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Asch S (1955) Studies of independence and conformity: a minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychol Monogr 70(9):1–70 Whole no. 416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics VII 1 1145b4–8, for example

    Google Scholar 

  40. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics I 7 1098b2–8, for example

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, pp 48–51

    Google Scholar 

  42. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics III 3 1112a5–7

    Google Scholar 

  43. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics IV 8 1128a23–34

    Google Scholar 

  44. Aristotle Nicomachean ethics I 7 1098a29–34

    Google Scholar 

  45. Daniels N (1979) Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. J Philos 76:256–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Irwin T (1988) Aristotle’s first principles. Clarendon Press, Oxford esp. Chapters 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  47. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics X 3 1174a2–4

    Google Scholar 

  48. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics II 4 1105b12–18

    Google Scholar 

  49. Beaman A, Barnes P, Klentz B, McQuirk B (1978) Increasing helping rates through information dissemination: teaching pays. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 4:406–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lieberman M (2000) Intuition: a social cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychol Bull 126:109–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Haidt J (2011) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev 108(4):819, 834, 829

    Google Scholar 

  52. MacIntyre A, After virtue

    Google Scholar 

  53. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics I 5 1096a5–7

    Google Scholar 

  54. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics I 2, for example

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edwin Hartman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hartman, E. (2013). Aristotle on Character Formation. In: Luetge, C. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_46

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1493-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1494-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics