Abstract
In this chapter, the notion of “purpose” is discussed. It is shown that it has a long tradition in Western philosophy and that it also plays a crucial role in business ethics. Without “purpose,” or concomitant, notions such as “goal” or “result,” human rationality seems to be at risk. This, however, is not to suggest that we cannot be critical about the way this notion functions in philosophy and society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Serres M (2008) La Guerre Mondiale. Le Pommier, Paris
Nietzsche F (1994) Zur Teleologie. In: Mette HJ, Schlechta K (eds) Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe, vol 3. Beck, München
Plato (1993) Phaedo. In: Rowe CJ (ed) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Aristotle (2001) On the parts of animals (trans: Lennox JG). Clarendon, Oxford
Aristotle (2009) The Nicomachean ethics (trans: Ross D). Revised with an introduction and notes by Brown L. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kant I (2007) Critique of judgement (trans: Meredith JC), edited by Walker N. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jonas H (1979) Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Insel Verlag, Frankfurt am Main
Kirk G, Raven J, Schofield M (2006) The presocratic philosophers, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
ten Bos, R. (2013). Purpose. In: Luetge, C. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1493-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1494-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law