Abstract
What is a fair distribution of risk? This chapter will look into three separate, but related, aspects of fairness in risk distributions. Firstly, I will locate the object of fairness when it comes to risk distribution. In contrast to distributions of goods, which we want to both increase and distribute fairly, risks are something we want to decrease and distribute fairly. The question of fairness in risk distributions is the question of how to combine these two partially conflicting claims; to fairness on the one hand and to risk reduction on the other. Secondly, I will take a closer look at what an equal distribution of chances for harm might be. I will point to the problem that the very idea of distributing probabilities entails. Thirdly, I address the question of when deviations from equal distributions of risks may be justified and how such inequalities can be addressed in a fair way. It will be suggested that the locus of fairness of risk should be sought in two steps: (1) the justification of particular risky activities, where the level of risk and the spread of that risk is taken into account, and (2) that any resulting higher risk for certain groups or individuals should be addressed through a combination of consent, precaution, and compensation, seeking to even out unfair exposure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altham JEJ (1983–1984) Ethics of risk. In: Proceedings of the aristotelian society, New Series, vol 84, pp 15–29
Ashford E (2003) The demandingness of Scanlon’s contractualism. Ethics 113:273–302
Ayer AJ (1972) Probability and evidence. Macmillan, London
Broome J (1984) Uncertainty and fairness. Econ J 94:624–632
Broome J (1990–1991) Fairness. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian society, New Series, vol 91. Blackwell, pp 87–101
Frankfurt H (1987) Equality as moral ideal. Ethics 98:21–43
Hansson SO (2003) Ethical criteria of risk acceptance. Erkenntnis 59(3):291–309
Hansson SO (2004) Philosophical perspectives on risk. Techné 8(1):10–33
Hayenhjelm M, Wolff J (forthcoming) The moral problem of risk impositions: a survey of the literature. European Journal of Philosophy
Hooker B (2005) Fairness. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 8(4):329–352
Lenman J (2008) Contractualism and risk imposition. Polit Philos Econ 7(1):99–122
Mirrlees JA (1982) The economic uses of utilitarianism. In: Sen A, Williams B (eds) Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 229–261
Munoz-Dardé V (manuscript, forthcoming book) Conversations with a flattened amish farmer: risk and reasonable rejection. In: Muonz-Dardé (forthcoming) Bound together: how the political is personal
Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state and utopia. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Parfit D (2002) Equality and priority. Ratio 10(3):202–221
Parfit D (2003) Justifiability of each person. Ratio, New Series 16:368–390
Perry S (2007) Risk, harm, interests, and rights. In: Lewens T (ed) Risk: philosophical perspectives. Routledge, London/New York, pp 190–209
Pettit Ph (1997) Republicanism. Oxford University Press, New York
Railton P (1983) Lock, stock, and peril: natural property rights, pollution, and risk. In: Gibson M (ed) To breathe freely. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ, pp 89–123
Rawls J (2003) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Reibetanz S (1998) Contractualism and aggregation. Ethics 108(2):296–311
Roeser S, Asvelt L (2009) The ethics of technological risk: introduction and overview. In: Asveld L, Roeser S (eds) The ethics of technological risk. Earthscan, London/Sterling, VA, pp 3–10
Scanlon TM (2000) What we owe to each other. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Taurek JM (1977) Should the numbers count? Philos Public Aff 6:293–316
Thomson JJ (1986) Rights, restitution, and risk. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Timmermann J (2004) The individualist lottery: how people count, but not their numbers. Analysis 64(2):106–112
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hayenhjelm, M. (2012). What Is a Fair Distribution of Risk?. In: Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., Peterson, M. (eds) Handbook of Risk Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1432-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1433-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law