Skip to main content

Dispersal and Wetland Fragmentation

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Wetland Book

Abstract

Wetlands provide habitat for a diverse array of aquatic and semiaquatic species, many of which provide direct economic and recreational value. Despite the ecosystem services provided by wetland fauna and flora, historical wetland loss has been dramatic. Wetland loss was >50% in the USA and 60–70% in Europe by the 1980s, with most losses resulting from agriculture and urban development. Although habitat loss can result from natural, stochastic events, anthropogenic habitat loss and subsequent fragmentation are among the most important drivers of biodiversity loss. One mechanism underlying the loss of biodiversity after habitat loss and fragmentation is the breakdown of wetland connectivity previously maintained by dispersal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E. The application of ‘least-cost’ modeling as a functional landscape model. Landscape Urban Plan. 2003;64:233–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amezaga JM, Santamaría L, Green AJ. Biotic wetland connectivity – supporting a new approach for wetland policy. Acta Oecol. 2002;23:213–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese JM, Fagan WF. A comparison-shopper’s guide to connectivity metrics. Front Ecol Environ. 2004;2:529–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clobert J, Baguette M, Benton TG, Bullock JM, editors. Dispersal ecology and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosentino BJ, Schooley RL, Phillips CA. Connectivity of agroecosystems: dispersal costs can vary among crops. Landscape Ecol. 2011a;26:371–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosentino BJ, Schooley RL, Phillips CA. Spatial connectivity moderates the effect of predatory fish on salamander metapopulation dynamics. Ecosphere. 2011b;2(8):1–14 . art 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP. Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol. 2000;14:314–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groom MJ, Meffe GK, Carroll CR. Principles of conservation biology. 3 ed. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gilpin ME, editors. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. San Diego: Academic Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz SG, Vining KC. Temporal connectivity in a prairie pothole complex. Wetlands. 2003;23:13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JL, Wallace JB. Lost linkages and lotic ecology: rediscovering small streams. In: Press MC, Huntly N, Levin S, editors. Ecology: achievement and challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 295–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Washington DC: World Resources Institute; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regester KJ, Whiles MR, Lips KR. Variation in the trophic basis of production and energy flow associated with emergence of larval salamander assemblages from forest ponds. Freshwater Biol. 2008;53:1754–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD. Distribution of amphibians in terrestrial habitat surrounding wetlands. Wetlands. 2007;27:153–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe JH, Georges A. Heterogeneous wetland complexes, buffer zones, and travel corridors: landscape management for freshwater reptiles. Biol Conserv. 2007;135:67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooley RL, Cosentino BJ. Metapopulation dynamics of wetland species. In: Finlayson CM, editor. Encyclopedia of wetlands. Dordrecht: Springer; in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD. Size does matter: the value of small isolated wetlands. National Wetland Newslett. 2000;22:5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR. Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conserv Biol. 2003;17:1219–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD, Fahrig L, With KA. Landscape connectivity: a return to basics. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M, editors. Connectivity conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 29–43.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward RT, Wui Y-S. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecol Econ. 2001;37:257–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bradley J. Cosentino or Robert L. Schooley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Cosentino, B.J., Schooley, R.L. (2018). Dispersal and Wetland Fragmentation. In: Finlayson, C.M., et al. The Wetland Book. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_56

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics