The Wetland Book pp 1461-1468 | Cite as

Wetland Classification: Overview

  • Philippe Gerbeaux
  • C. Max Finlayson
  • Anne A. van Dam
Reference work entry

Abstract

The term “wetland” groups together a range of largely aquatic habitats that usually have a number of common features, such as the presence of specific vegetation, soils, and water regimes, including the occurrence of continuous, seasonal, or periodic standing water or saturated soils. Most approaches used around the world to classify wetlands are referred to as “classification systems”. The wetland definition and typology used by the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands is an example which includes a wider range of wetland types than included by many others. The Ramsar definition was given in the text of the Convention in 1971 and is one of several classification approaches used around the world. The evolution of wetland classification systems is outlined and a number of other classification systems currently in use around the world are briefly reviewed and discussed in this chapter.

References

  1. Bailey KD. Typologies and Taxonomies. An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brinson MM. Assessing wetland functions using the hydrogeomorphic approach. National Wetlands Newsletter. 1996;18:10–6.Google Scholar
  3. Brinson MM. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4. Vicksburg: US Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station; 1993.Google Scholar
  4. Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. US Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS 79/31. 1979. 103 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Davidson N. How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar Freshw Res. 2014;65:936–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finlayson CM, van der Valk AG. Wetland classification and inventory: a summary. Vegetatio. 1995;18(1-2):185–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finlayson CM, Begg GW, Howes J, Davies J, Tagi K, Lowry J. A manual for an inventory of Asian wetlands (version 1.0). Wetlands International Global Series 10. Wetlands International: Kuala Lumpur; 2002. 72 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Finlayson CM, Davidson NC, Spiers AG, Stevenson NJ. Global wetland inventory–current status and future priorities. Mar Freshw Res. 1999;50(8):717–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kondolf GM. Geomorphological stream channel classification in aquatic habitat restoration: uses and limitations. Aquatic Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 1995;5:127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Masing V, Botch M, Läänelaid A. Mires of the former Soviet Union. Wetl Ecol Manag. 2010;18:397–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MEA. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being, wetlands and water synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2005.Google Scholar
  12. Naiman RJ, Lonzarich DG, Beechie TJ, Ralph SC. General principles of classification and the assessment of conservation potential in rivers. In: Boon PJ, Calow P, Petts GE, editors. River Conservation and Management. Chichester: Wiley; 1992. p. 93–123.Google Scholar
  13. Newson MD, Clark MJ, Sear DA, Brookes A. The geomorphologic basis for classifying rivers. Aquatic Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 1998;8:415–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. Designation Ramsar sites: strategic framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance. In: Ramsar handbooks for the wise use of wetlands, vol. 17. 4th ed. Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat; 2010.Google Scholar
  15. Scott DA, Jones TA. Classification and inventory of wetlands: a global overview. Vegetatio. 1995;118:3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Semeniuk CA. Wetlands of the Darling System – a geomorphic classification. J R Soc West Aust. 1987;69:95–111.Google Scholar
  17. Semeniuk CA, Semeniuk V. A geomorphic approach to global classification for inland wetlands. Vegetatio. 1995;118(1-2):103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Semeniuk V, Semeniuk CA. A geomorphic approach to global classification for natural inland wetlands and rationalization of the system used by the Ramsar Convention – a discussion. Wetl Ecol Manag. 1997;5(2):145–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Simpson MR. A functional classification of European wetlands. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Royal Holloway, University of London; 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Gerbeaux
    • 1
  • C. Max Finlayson
    • 2
    • 4
  • Anne A. van Dam
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Conservation, Science and Policy GroupAquatic Division UnitChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Institute for Land, Water and SocietyCharles Sturt UniversityAlburyAustralia
  3. 3.Aquatic Ecosystems Group, Department of Water Science and EngineeringUNESCO-IHE, Institue for Water EducationDelftThe Netherlands
  4. 4.UNESCO-IHEInstitute for Water EducationDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations