Advertisement

The Wetland Book pp 1997-2001 | Cite as

Economics of Wetland Restoration and Creation

  • Edward Barbier
Reference work entry

Abstract

As the overall aim of wetland restoration, enhancement, and creation is to recover valuable ecosystem goods and services, assessing these benefits is vital. In addition, as wetland restoration and creation are not “costless” activities, they must be assessed in terms of their cost effectiveness and their impacts on different stakeholders. Evaluating these various benefits and costs, as well as the distribution of their impacts, is critical in determining the success or failure of wetland restoration and creation of policies and investments.

Keywords

Cost-benefit analysis Ecosystem services Wetland creation Wetland restoration 

References

  1. Aronson J, Blignaut JN, Milton SJ, Le Maitre D, Esler KJ, Lomouzin A, Fontaine C, de Wit MP, Mugido W, Prinsloo P, van der Elst L, Lederer N. Are socioeconomic benefits of restoration adequately quantified? A meta-analysis of recent papers (2000-2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 other scientific journals. Restor Ecol. 2010;18:143–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aswani S, Christie P, Muthiga N, Mahon R, Primavera J, Cramer L, Barbier EB, Granek E, Kennedy C, Wolanski E, Hacker S. The way forward with ecosystem-based management in tropical contexts: reconciling with existing management systems. Mar Policy. 2012;36:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbier EB. In the wake of the tsunami: lessons learned from the household decision to replant mangroves in Thailand. Resour Energy Econ. 2008;30:229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbier EB. Coastal wetland restoration and the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2011a;64:1821–49.Google Scholar
  5. Barbier EB. Wetlands as natural assets. Hydrol Sci J. 2011b;56(8):1360–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbier EB. Valuing ecosystem services for coastal wetland protection and restoration: progress and challenges. Resources. 2013;2:213–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bendor T. A dynamic analysis of the wetland mitigation process and its effects on no net loss policy. Landsc Urban Plan. 2009;89:17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dale L, Gerlak AK. It’s all in the numbers: acreage tallies and environmental program evaluation. Environ Manag. 2007;39:246–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erftemeijer PLA, Bualuang A. Participation of local communities in mangrove forest rehabilitation in Pattani Bay, Thailand: Learning from successes and failures. In: M. Gawler, editor, Strategies for wise use of wetlands: best practices in participatory management. Proceedings of a workshop held at the 2nd International Conference on Wetlands and Development (Nov. 1998, Dakar, Senegal). Wageningen: Wetlands International, IUCN, WWF Publication 56; 2002. p. 27–36.Google Scholar
  10. Jenkins WA, Murray BC, Kramer RA, Faulkner SP. Valuing ecosystem services from wetlands restoration in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Ecol Econ. 2010;69:1051–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lewis III RR, Gilmore Jr RG. Important considerations to achieve successful mangrove forest restoration with optimum fish habitat. Bull Mar Sci. 2007;3:823–37.Google Scholar
  12. Matthews JW, Endress AG. Performance criteria, compliance success, and vegetation development in compensatory mitigation wetlands. Environ Manag. 2008;41:130–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Milon JW, Scrogin D. Latent preferences and valuation of wetland ecosystem restoration. Ecol Econ. 2006;56:152–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pendleton L, Atiyah P, Moorthy A. Is the non-market literature adequate to support coastal and marine management? Ocean Coast Manag. 2007;50:363–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Posthumus H, Rouquette JR, Morris J, Gowing DJG, Hess TM. A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services: a case study on lowland floodplains in England. Ecol Econ. 2010;69:1510–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Simenstad C, Reed D, Ford M. When is restoration not? Incorporating landscape-scale processes to restore self-sustaining ecosystems in coastal wetland restoration. Ecol Eng. 2006;26:27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sudtongkong C, Webb EL. Outcomes of state- vs. community-based mangrove management in southern Thailand. Ecol Soc. 2008;13:27. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol.13/iss2/art27/.
  18. Zedler JB, Kercher S. Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2005;20:39–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceUniversity of Wyoming, College of BusinessLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations